Jackass!


"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
We've been paying $3.35 or so. I hope it goes up to $5.

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
The point is not to "collapse" the economy. The point is
to force people to
change their driving and car purchase habits. That would
do it, according to
economists.


Do you ride a bicycle everywhere? Do you own a car?

Why are liberals so selfish?

SV

"Mys Terry" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:12:45 -0700, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

What does this have to do with gas prices?

You posted something incredibly stupid and I simply
reciprocated.


Your posts are always incredibly stupid.

S

"Mys Terry" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:43:13 -0400, katy
wrote:

Capt. JG wrote:
The point is not to "collapse" the economy. The point
is to force people to
change their driving and car purchase habits. That
would do it, according to
economists.

I think large cities should be proactive on this issue
and legislate
that unless there is a specific reason for driving a pick
up truck
or SUV in the city, less than 3 occupants, etc, that
those vehicles
be disallowed (passing through on the xway not counting).

Lets take action on the REAL issue behind this and many
other issues
by severely limiting the number of children people can
have. Reduce
the world population by 50% and a lot of current problems
will simply
vanish along with the excess population.


Your Mom should be severely fined and punished for having
you.

S

"katy" wrote in message
...
Capt. JG wrote:
The point is not to "collapse" the economy. The point is
to force people to
change their driving and car purchase habits. That would
do it, according to
economists.

I think large cities should be proactive on this issue and
legislate
that unless there is a specific reason for driving a pick
up truck
or SUV in the city, less than 3 occupants, etc, that those
vehicles
be disallowed (passing through on the xway not counting).


Why not make everyone ride mopeds?

Scotty wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...
Capt. JG wrote:
The point is not to "collapse" the economy. The point is
to force people to
change their driving and car purchase habits. That would
do it, according to
economists.

I think large cities should be proactive on this issue and
legislate
that unless there is a specific reason for driving a pick
up truck
or SUV in the city, less than 3 occupants, etc, that those
vehicles
be disallowed (passing through on the xway not counting).


Why not make everyone ride mopeds?




If more people rode mopeds, vespas, those scooter things, etc we'd
be better off. Europeans do, why shouldn't we?

Scotty, don't get too upset. This guy (or is it a woman?) is not worth
responding to, although you are correct of course.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Scotty" wrote in message
...

"Mys Terry" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:12:45 -0700, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

What does this have to do with gas prices?

You posted something incredibly stupid and I simply
reciprocated.


Your posts are always incredibly stupid.

S

That's an easy fix. It's called Weight Watchers.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Bart Senior" .@. wrote in message ...
I agree with Max.

Also, American's are simply big and can't fit in, and
won't buy, cars built for midgets.

"Maxprop" wrote

"Capt. JG" wrote

The point is not to "collapse" the economy. The point is to force people
to change their driving and car purchase habits. That would do it,
according to economists.

Yeah, I've heard that, too. And I disagree.

Americans love big, consumptive vehicles (boats, airplanes, and
motorhomes as well as cars). All those fuel prices will do is put some
people in the poor house, shut down some small ma-pa businesses, convince
Daimler-Chrysler to import the Smart Car, and tank the economy while
causing inflation and interest rates to rise. But the total fuel burned
in this country won't change much, if at all.

Ethanol is a great alternative fuel, and almost inexhaustible. But Big
Oil has seen to it that it will never be readily accepted, at least as
long as the flow of crude is unimpeded, despite the cost.

Max

?? I drive a Jeep, and I have three other cars. I'm willing to pay more or
pick smaller cars if that's what it takes. I don't often agree with Bushco,
and even though he's just pandering, I agree that America is addicted to oil
produced by countries who are hostile to us. We should let them eat their
oil by reducing our dependency.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Scotty" wrote in message
...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
The point is not to "collapse" the economy. The point is
to force people to
change their driving and car purchase habits. That would
do it, according to
economists.


Do you ride a bicycle everywhere? Do you own a car?

Why are liberals so selfish?

SV

Not for truckers. They (and other groups) should get a discount. It should
be $5/gal for regular drivers.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Scotty" wrote in message
...
Jackass!


"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
We've been paying $3.35 or so. I hope it goes up to $5.