"Lloyd Bonafide" wrote in message
. ..

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
You're a lot more than all ears. But, being a gentleman I won't say what
else is the larger contribution.

A real gentleman would have carried on the conversation and answered the
question rather than allude to a personal attack. Any discussion with you
(by anyone) winds up with you flinging personal attacks. Is that the
hallmark of a gentlemen?

It's the hallmark of the environmental wackos who have nothing but their
dogma as a counterpose to verifiable scientific research that refutes, or
fails to support, their claims.

I have not attacked you in any way. I've presented factual scientific
evidence, for both sides no less, and somehow you feel threatened.

Life is tough enough already, why make it tougher?

When presented with scientific fact, they respond pretty much as Jon has.
Ad hominem attacks are rampant in any discussion of global warming, thanks
to a lack of credible evidence to support their claims.


Max

I haven't attacked anyone, but it sure seems like you are. You just called
me an environmentalist wacko, which I'm not.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Lloyd Bonafide" wrote in message
. ..

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
You're a lot more than all ears. But, being a gentleman I won't say what
else is the larger contribution.

A real gentleman would have carried on the conversation and answered the
question rather than allude to a personal attack. Any discussion with you
(by anyone) winds up with you flinging personal attacks. Is that the
hallmark of a gentlemen?

It's the hallmark of the environmental wackos who have nothing but their
dogma as a counterpose to verifiable scientific research that refutes, or
fails to support, their claims.

I have not attacked you in any way. I've presented factual scientific
evidence, for both sides no less, and somehow you feel threatened.

Life is tough enough already, why make it tougher?

When presented with scientific fact, they respond pretty much as Jon has.
Ad hominem attacks are rampant in any discussion of global warming, thanks
to a lack of credible evidence to support their claims.


Max