LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
Maxprop
 
Posts: n/a
Default I'm ba aaaack!


OzOne wrote in message ...
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 01:14:08 GMT, "Maxprop"
scribbled thusly:



Eaxactly my point.
Every non US citizen is subject to the most rigorous scrutiny yet 95%
of containers are left untouched....homeland security is a sham.


Let me play the devil's advocate here for a moment: So we've established
that examining incoming containers is not feasible. For that reason, is
it
reasonable to simply ignore all other aspects of homeland security that
ARE
feasible, such as clearing individuals for entry?

Max

T's feasible....just look at the number of people employed to check
baggage, people and crdentials at every airport in the US.
Thing is, putting that same number of people into checking containers
has little political advantage because Joe Public won't see the work
being done and be able to wrap himself in that warm fuzzy security
blanket.



Have you ever looked at a shipping container packed full of, say, boxes with
electronics? There might be literally hundreds or thousands of cardboard
cartons in a single container packed wall-to-wall, floor-to-ceiling. How
does an inspector check each carton to be sure it contains what the label
specifies? A single carton could contains plastique or the makings of a
dirty bomb. Are you going to open each and every one? Some containers are
packed with loose items, and would be even more difficult to inspect. From
a cost effectivity standpoint, it isn't feasible to inspect the contents of
every container entering this country.


Ever thought that the level of personal inspection has lulled most
passengers into a very false sense of security so they are now not on
the lookout for stuff happening onboard?


I think about it every time I fly. But there is little or nothing the
average passenger can do if he spots something or someone suspicious once
airborne. Getting lulled into a false sense of security has obviously
helped the airlines avoid a plunge into the abyss of financial ruin. Most
of them, anyhow.

If, however, we abandon the personal inspections, what prevents a repeat of
9/11?

Max



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I'm ba aaaack! Thom Stewart ASA 7 February 25th 06 06:18 AM
I'm ba aaaack! John Cairns ASA 3 February 19th 06 04:28 PM
I'm ba aaaack! Joe ASA 2 February 19th 06 12:55 AM
I'm ba aaaack! katy ASA 0 February 19th 06 12:29 AM
I'm ba aaaack! Lady Pilot ASA 0 February 18th 06 04:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017