Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is a better looking boat than this:
http://www.sailinglinks.com/images/RedCloud.jpg Redcloud's ports scuttle her looks. A Sea Sprite 34 is more generic than a Nordic 30 and a slower boat. The Nordic's stern section makes a bit more timeless. RB 35s5 NY |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So your an ass man....I look at the whole package.
Take a look again at redclouds hull. http://www.sailinglinks.com/images/RedCloud.jpg Her fair shape defines TIMELESS. From her hour glass stern to her clipper bow.. with her full keel and deep board..and her ketch rigging....she takes the best from the golden age of sail. Her ports provide a lite airy feel and provide a fine view for dinner dining below in the salon. They are bullit proof. Joe |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Her ports provide a lite airy feel and provide a fine view for dinner
dining below in the salon. They are bullit proof. I suspect they need to be. In any case they clash with her lines and don't go. Perhaps if you could post ANY other pics. RB 35s5 NY |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. Rob" wrote in message ups.com... Is a better looking boat than this: http://www.sailinglinks.com/images/RedCloud.jpg Redcloud's ports scuttle her looks. A Sea Sprite 34 is more generic than a Nordic 30 I'll grant that CCA-type boats were relatively common in the 40s and 50s, but not today. She never fails to attract compliments and photographers like flies every time she's on the water. And at the dock. Her curving sheerline and aesthetic overhangs never fail to draw praise and smiles. and a slower boat. That would be a serious mistake if you chose to race against my boat in, say, a fin keel Catalina 34 with a PHRF of 144. My boat tends to sail with C34s upwind and beats them easily off the wind or downwind. My boat placed second in her class in the Chicago-Mac. Her rating of 190 is a gift. The Nordic's stern section makes a bit more timeless. The Nordic isn't the prettiest of the canoe stern boats, but it is better looking than, say, something with a horrendous, big-ass swim platform. Max |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That would be a serious mistake if you chose to race against my boat
in, say, a fin keel Catalina 34 with a PHRF of 144. My boat tends to sail with C34s upwind and beats them easily off the wind or downwind. A Sea Sprite 34 compared to a Catalina 34 is half a ton more with 5 feet less LWL. There really is no way you'll overcome the Catalina's LWL and lighter weight in a variety of conditions IF she's well sailed with a clean bottom. On the LIS, the TL Cat is rated at 150. She never fails to attract compliments and photographers like flies every time she's on the water. You must live someplace very unusual. Your boat and boats like it are as common as flies here. It's funny how people always say "my boat draws compliments." Hey, my boat one boat of the year in 3 countries and in Cruising World. Yeah okay, big deal. If YOU like your boat, that's all that matters. And I only rated people who've had the balls and confidence to share pics of their boats here. The Nordic isn't the prettiest of the canoe stern boats, but it is better looking than, say, something with a horrendous, big-ass swim platform. I have a friend who can't get past the looks of my boat or even a Catalina 30, which is pretty inoffensive in my book. If you only have an eye for the older stuff that's fine. But Mooron's boat is more distinctive in shape and a sharper looking boat. If your old Sea Sprite is in bristol restored shape, I'm sure we'd all like to see pics. How my swim platform fits into this is a mystery to anyone but you. RB 35s5 NY |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. Rob" wrote in message oups.com... That would be a serious mistake if you chose to race against my boat in, say, a fin keel Catalina 34 with a PHRF of 144. My boat tends to sail with C34s upwind and beats them easily off the wind or downwind. A Sea Sprite 34 compared to a Catalina 34 is half a ton more with 5 feet less LWL. I couldn't really expect you to know this, but boats of the generation of mine have those overhangs for a reason: the waterline length increases significantly when they heel. On paper the LWL looks incredibly short, but it is well within the normal range of boats in her length range when heeled. That's at least partly why her rating is so high--it's based upon the resting LWL. Further, that short waterline is a huge advantage downwind, when wetted surface area minimized is a plus. That probably has something to do with her ability to easily sail around many larger boats with the wind abaft. A Hunter 410 from our marina can't stay with her downwind. In fact we lose sight of her astern within half an hour. Same story with a new Catalina 350 from our marina. There really is no way you'll overcome the Catalina's LWL and lighter weight in a variety of conditions IF she's well sailed with a clean bottom. On paper that would seem to be the case. In reality it's not true. My wife and I have coined a term: the Catalina one-eighty, which is what they regularly seem to do ostensibly to avoid embarrassement. On the LIS, the TL Cat is rated at 150. She never fails to attract compliments and photographers like flies every time she's on the water. You must live someplace very unusual. Your boat and boats like it are as common as flies here. You aren't wrong on this point. We don't have many older traditional boats here, just lots of Beneteaus and Catalinas and Hunters. Ours in not unique, but it is rare, and most people have an eye for aesthetic sheer lines and graceful overhangs. She's also bristol with forest green Awlgrip topsides. On the right coast, CCA-type boats are plentiful. In fact, ours is only one of two Luders 34 designs on Lake Michigan. The majority of the others is in and around Maine. It's funny how people always say "my boat draws compliments." Hey, my boat one boat of the year in 3 countries and in Cruising World. It may have, but it looks like just about every other plastic boat being produced today. It's got some great qualities, Bubbles, and it's a boat worth owning. I'm sure you'll love it. But it's not exactly distinctive. Perhaps if you sailed in the Persian Gulf your boat would draw attention. g Yeah okay, big deal. If YOU like your boat, that's all that matters. And I only rated people who've had the balls and confidence to share pics of their boats here. I sent several photos to a photo website that someone--can't recall who--provided for ASA boats a few years ago. I'll be happy to provide newer ones to a similar website. I'll also send you some via email, if you're man enough to accept 'em. The Nordic isn't the prettiest of the canoe stern boats, but it is better looking than, say, something with a horrendous, big-ass swim platform. I have a friend who can't get past the looks of my boat or even a Catalina 30, which is pretty inoffensive in my book. If you only have an eye for the older stuff that's fine. But Mooron's boat is more distinctive in shape and a sharper looking boat. It's all in the eye of the beholder. Mooron's boat is attractive, so is yours and mine. The point is not which is better looking, but *to whom* it is attractive. I like mine. CM likes his. I'm betting you like yours. Just don't become so arrogant as to believe that your aesthetic sensibilities are those of everyone else. If your old Sea Sprite is in bristol restored shape, I'm sure we'd all like to see pics. How my swim platform fits into this is a mystery to anyone but you. I guess I should have put the proverbial smiley face behind that swim platform statement. I was ribbing you about your adamant declaration that a swim platform is a necessity. To be honest, it would be nice on most boats, but ridiculous on ours. Our freeboard is so low it simply isn't necessary, but our friend's new Moorings 445 would be difficult to board from a dink without one. And yes, my SS34 is bristol and probably the best-equipped of any of the roughly 50 of them built. It's also one of the rare factory-finished boats. Quite a few of them were owner finished--some are nice, but some have amateurish joinerwork below. Give me a website and you'll have photos. Max |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ive me a website and you'll have photos.
Max, send me a pic of your boat (to ) and I'll post it so everyone can. See. I'll leave it up until you say to take it down. Pick a good one. RB 35s5 NY |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. Rob" wrote in message oups.com... ive me a website and you'll have photos. Max, send me a pic of your boat (to ) and I'll post it so everyone can. See. I'll leave it up until you say to take it down. Pick a good one. They're in the (e)mail. Max |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Heh..... here is the sailcalc comparison between a Sea Sprite 34 & the
Nordica 30. I believe the Nordica 30 has a 180 PHRF. I think the telling factor lies in the displacement to LWL which places the Sea Sprite in the very heavy cruiser class at over 400. Performance Comparison LOA Sea Sprite 34 34.08 Nordica 30 29.49 LWL Sea Sprite 34 24.26 Nordica 30 25 Beam Sea Sprite 34 10.4 Nordica 30 9.77 Displacement Sea Sprite 34 13208 Nordica 30 10220 Sail Area Sea Sprite 34 535 Nordica 30 502 Capsize Ratio Sea Sprite 34 1.76 Nordica 30 1.8 Hull Speed Sea Sprite 34 6.6 Nordica 30 6.7 Sail Area to Displacement Sea Sprite 34 15.32 Nordica 30 17.06 Displacement to LWL Sea Sprite 34 413 Nordica 30 292 LWL to Beam Sea Sprite 34 2.33 Nordica 30 2.56 Motion Comfort Sea Sprite 34 32.9 Nordica 30 28.57 Pounds/Inch Sea Sprite 34 902 Nordica 30 873 "Maxprop" wrote in message I'll grant that CCA-type boats were relatively common in the 40s and 50s, but not today. She never fails to attract compliments and photographers like flies every time she's on the water. And at the dock. Her curving sheerline and aesthetic overhangs never fail to draw praise and smiles. That would be a serious mistake if you chose to race against my boat in, say, a fin keel Catalina 34 with a PHRF of 144. My boat tends to sail with C34s upwind and beats them easily off the wind or downwind. My boat placed second in her class in the Chicago-Mac. Her rating of 190 is a gift. The Nordic isn't the prettiest of the canoe stern boats, but it is better looking than, say, something with a horrendous, big-ass swim platform. Max |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Nordica will sail circles, figure eights and hexagons around the
Sea Sprite 34. RB 35s5 NY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So where is...................... | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
Carribean Sail | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
A Recreational Boating Message | General |