Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No. There is no such thing as zero heel--a boat will always heel when
beating to windward unless it's a small dinghy with a 300lb. skipper and similarly-sized crew. Not true. OzOne wrote: Boats, even large yachts are often stacked to windward in light conditions, particularly now that the plastic sails no longer need heel to induce some sort of shape. It produces better gust response, and helmmovement in the gust among other things Yep. The boat accelerates much better and if it's one of those gawd-awful days with chop & light air, it can go thru the lumpy parts better. It doesn't take a heavy crew, even. OTOH there are times when I like a lot of heel, like just before a tack ![]() DSK |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message No. There is no such thing as zero heel--a boat will always heel when beating to windward unless it's a small dinghy with a 300lb. skipper and similarly-sized crew. Not true. Explanation of your response, please. Yep. The boat accelerates much better and if it's one of those gawd-awful days with chop & light air, it can go thru the lumpy parts better. I agree that it does, but what is your explanation for this effect? It doesn't take a heavy crew, even. Not in light air. That's what I said originally. OTOH there are times when I like a lot of heel, like just before a tack ![]() For roll-tacking? Max |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maxprop wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message No. There is no such thing as zero heel--a boat will always heel when beating to windward unless it's a small dinghy with a 300lb. skipper and similarly-sized crew. Not true. Explanation of your response, please. The boat heels in response to 1- the amount of wind 2- the way the sails are trimmed If there's a LOT of wind, then yes the boat will heel... even with no sails up at all. In normal sailing winds, it is quite possible to trim for 5 degrees windward heel. This is not new, it was fairly common advice... yet very rarely followed... back in the 1960s. One thing that is new, and that I have not tried, is Oz1's advice that fancy plastic sails don't need to be heeled to take shape in very light air. Yep. The boat accelerates much better and if it's one of those gawd-awful days with chop & light air, it can go thru the lumpy parts better. I agree that it does, but what is your explanation for this effect? ??? Why do I have to explain it? It doesn't take a heavy crew, even. Not in light air. That's what I said originally. Nor in moderate air... if you're in control of the boat and not vice-versa. OTOH there are times when I like a lot of heel, like just before a tack ![]() For roll-tacking? Bingo. DSK |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If there's a LOT of wind, then yes the boat will heel...
Really and truly???? Doug, you're an idiot. RB 35s5 NY |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message news ![]() Maxprop wrote: "DSK" wrote in message No. There is no such thing as zero heel--a boat will always heel when beating to windward unless it's a small dinghy with a 300lb. skipper and similarly-sized crew. Not true. Explanation of your response, please. The boat heels in response to 1- the amount of wind 2- the way the sails are trimmed If there's a LOT of wind, then yes the boat will heel... even with no sails up at all. In normal sailing winds, it is quite possible to trim for 5 degrees windward heel. This is not new, it was fairly common advice... yet very rarely followed... back in the 1960s. I can't imagine what sort of trim would heel a close-hauled boat to windward in normal (non-drifter) winds,WITHOUT the addition of hiking railmeat. But I'm open to learn. One thing that is new, and that I have not tried, is Oz1's advice that fancy plastic sails don't need to be heeled to take shape in very light air. Fully-battened mains will obviously stay in shape, even when heeled to windward. But I wasn't aware that the same thing could be achieved with some of the new sheet laminate headsails. Yep. The boat accelerates much better and if it's one of those gawd-awful days with chop & light air, it can go thru the lumpy parts better. I agree that it does, but what is your explanation for this effect? ??? Why do I have to explain it? You don't have to do anything you don't want to do, but there must be some reason for it. I was just curious, not interogative. It doesn't take a heavy crew, even. Not in light air. That's what I said originally. Nor in moderate air... if you're in control of the boat and not vice-versa. Depends upon your definition of "moderate air," and whether you're sailing a dinghy or a more substantial keel boat. A dinghy is easy to keep bolt upright in moderate air, but a keel boat will be somewhat more difficult unless one has a hefty crew complement on the weather rail. OTOH there are times when I like a lot of heel, like just before a tack ![]() For roll-tacking? Bingo. Roll-tacking was not allowed in Snipe events when I raced them. Now apparently it's SOP. When just sailing around the lake with friends or my wife, I used to roll-tack the Snipe and found it to be a very effective way to power through the tack. This was long before discussions of the maneuver hit the sailing press. Later I used it routinely when racing Lasers, but finally was DSQ'd in one race in a regatta in Michigan for using "disallowed kinetics." Forced to stop, it ****ed me off so thoroughly that I sold the Laser and quit dingy racing altogether. It was a bitter pill to discover that years later it was considered okay. Max |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geesh, Max, hold old are you? Roll tacking has
been acceptable for as long as I can remember. They're just now beginning to crack down on kinetics. And in my opinion, the Laser class overlooks more kinetics than any other class. You can always spot the Laser sailors when they sailing in another class. They're the ones ooching, sculling, pumping, torquing, and roll jibing every 30 seconds. Interestingly, they're also the ones not getting along with their crew. Kind of explains why they single hand. S. "Maxprop" wrote in message k.net... :: Roll-tacking was not allowed in Snipe events when I raced them. Now : apparently it's SOP. When just sailing around the lake with friends or my : wife, I used to roll-tack the Snipe and found it to be a very effective way : to power through the tack. This was long before discussions of the maneuver : hit the sailing press. Later I used it routinely when racing Lasers, but : finally was DSQ'd in one race in a regatta in Michigan for using "disallowed : kinetics." Forced to stop, it ****ed me off so thoroughly that I sold the : Laser and quit dingy racing altogether. It was a bitter pill to discover : that years later it was considered okay. : : Max : : |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "NotPony" wrote in messag Geesh, Max, hold old are you? Roll tacking has been acceptable for as long as I can remember. I sailed Snipes in the early 70s. The SCIRA rule book, at that time, prohibited "ooching, sculling, pumping, rocking, and any other kinetic movements which might give the competitor an unfair advantage." I never roll tacked in a race, but did so all the time while just day sailing the boat. The Snipe roll tacks as well as any boat I've sailed, which is probably why Snipe sailors all do it these days. They're just now beginning to crack down on kinetics. And in my opinion, the Laser class overlooks more kinetics than any other class. When I began to sail Lasers in '72, no one was roll tacking except me and a few others from fleets in and around Detroit and Indianapolis. (I can't honestly say what was happening out West or East, however.) Other skippers used to ask me what I was doing, and I was always happy to oblige with info and instructions on how to do it. Unfortunately one of them was a district officer who took my information back to a national meeting at which kinetics were deemed "unfair." The following spring I sailed in a regatta on the Detroit River and was DSQ'd in a race for roll-tacking. I still won my class, but that race was my throwout. Lucky for me it was my second to last race, because I did poorly in the last race after being told I'd be DSQ'd if I roll tacked even once. ****ed off, I sold the boat, and three years later everyone was roll-tacking Lasers. The national big wigs must have had a change of heart, or at least decided they'd be unable to stop something that everyone was doing by then. You can always spot the Laser sailors when they sailing in another class. They're the ones ooching, sculling, pumping, torquing, and roll jibing every 30 seconds. Interestingly, they're also the ones not getting along with their crew. Kind of explains why they single hand. Actually it's that they normally single hand that makes them unable to get along with crew. After single handing for a year or so, I found it frustrating to go back to having a crew (my wife) who couldn't read my mind. It was simply awful to have to vocalize intentions and instructions again. After dumping the Laser, I bought another Snipe and regretted it for the entire season. Sold it in the Fall. It was either that or face the prospect of divorce. g It was a good decision, because we've been married for almost 35 years. Max |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maxprop wrote:
I can't imagine what sort of trim would heel a close-hauled boat to windward in normal (non-drifter) winds,WITHOUT the addition of hiking railmeat. But I'm open to learn. It doesn't take much "rail meat," but it does take hiking. Fully-battened mains will obviously stay in shape, even when heeled to windward. They will, kinda sort-of. Not well wnough to sail as efficiently as with a little heel, though. ... But I wasn't aware that the same thing could be achieved with some of the new sheet laminate headsails. I wasn't eaither but would like to see it. Yep. The boat accelerates much better and if it's one of those gawd-awful days with chop & light air, it can go thru the lumpy parts better. I agree that it does, but what is your explanation for this effect? ??? Why do I have to explain it? You don't have to do anything you don't want to do, but there must be some reason for it. I was just curious, not interogative. I don't really know, although I have some possibilities in mind. More power, for starters. Depends upon your definition of "moderate air," and whether you're sailing a dinghy or a more substantial keel boat. Nope. Only a boat that will be affected by crew weight. Roll-tacking was not allowed in Snipe events when I raced them. ??? Roll tacking has always been allowed. Now, there have always been rules against various forms of propulsion, some of which are suspiciously close to sailing but are deemed inappropriate... or ungentlemanly, or something. If one were to roll-tack one's way up the windward leg, using each tack simply for propulsion and not because of windshifts or competitors, that would be illegal, then & now. ... Later I used it routinely when racing Lasers, but finally was DSQ'd in one race in a regatta in Michigan for using "disallowed kinetics." Forced to stop, it ****ed me off so thoroughly that I sold the Laser and quit dingy racing altogether. It was a bitter pill to discover that years later it was considered okay. Seems to be the prevalent mode of light-air sailing in college, which is a shame. My rule of thumb- don't use kinetics any more than the top few boats are. And practice, so that if they are busy sawing loas across the race course, you can do it better & faster. In fact, I have occasionally complained to other skippers that they were getting a bit heavy handed on the rocking & pumping, got ignored, and rock/pumped my way past, whereupon I stopped & grinned back at them. Point made. If you get DSQ'd you should honestly be able to say (and hopefully get the backing of a few other skippers) "I was doing exactly what the other boats were doing, so DSQ them also." Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message Roll tacking has always been allowed. Now, there have always been rules against various forms of propulsion, some of which are suspiciously close to sailing but are deemed inappropriate... or ungentlemanly, or something. Roll tacking wasn't specifically outlawed in the SCIRA rule book, but most regatta committees ruled it illegal as an interpretation of the anti-kinetics rules. I read at the time that the top sailor in the Snipe Junior Nationals was DSQ'd from two races in 1972 for roll tacking. He still won the nationals that year, his other finishes were 1-1-1-1-2-1-1. But the scuttlebut thereafter was that roll tacking wasn't allowed in Snipes. A few years later everyone was doing it. Things change. If one were to roll-tack one's way up the windward leg, using each tack simply for propulsion and not because of windshifts or competitors, that would be illegal, then & now. Interpretation changes with time. Kinetics become better-defined and written rules become more specific. When I raced Snipes they were the second largest one-design class in the world, with Sunfish #1. Now neither class is even viable any longer. If you get DSQ'd you should honestly be able to say (and hopefully get the backing of a few other skippers) "I was doing exactly what the other boats were doing, so DSQ them also." Depends upon how well politically aligned you are with the race committee. My experience is that most race committees tend to have selective vision and variable rules interpretation skills. Max |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Well, Jeff? | ASA | |||
Multi Hulls Capsize in Yacht Race | ASA | |||
A Ship of Fools | ASA | |||
A Recreational Boating Message | General | |||
A Recreational Boating Message | General |