LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Maxprop
 
Posts: n/a
Default Thank You JEFF!!!


"Capt. Rob" wrote in message

Hmmmm....seems few others agree with this. Even Loco and Steve have
said the higher pointing boat has the advantage.


Only if the skipper has the knowledge and experience to utilize that
advantage. The art of pointing involves a lot more than simply sailing as
closely to the wind as possible.

VMG across the widest
possible range is what determines perfomance. This is the essense of
sailing performance in fact.


VMG has more to do with the skipper than the boat. Paul Elvstrom proved
that for decades, sailing inferior boats against superior ones with inferior
skippers, and beating them easily.

Wish I'd written that!


What a lofty goal, to be able to coin a phrase suggesting something
blatantly obvious.

For a boat to be
considered high performance it must have excellent windward ability, be
fast off the wind and be stable downwind. A PDQ 36 is only fast off the
wind and not in light air. It MIGHT win a race...so long as the
conditions were pretty specific to it's advantages. My C&C 32 clobbered
a well sailed Gemini even though it was faster downwind.


It is conceivable that some Geminis are owned and sailed by incompetent
people.

Upwind it was
a dead duck, just like Jeff's boat would be. He already wrote that
tacking is tedious!
Get a clue...even a PDQ owner says you're wrong. The PDQ and other cats
like her are fantastic cruising boats for some folks, but sailing
enthusiasts still prefer First series boats, J-Boats, Swans, Swedens


Interesting that you include your boat with such a distinquished list of
yachts. Reminds me of a guy who used to boast that his Cosworth Vega was in
the same league as a Ferrari 248GTSi.

and the rest who comprise the cruiser/racer-racer/cruiser section of
the market. They're just more fun to sail, tack fast and can go upwind.


And your 35s5, compared with similarly-sized cruising boats, is cramped,
lightly constructed, uncomfortable in a seaway, and must be reefed early and
often, not to mention worth a fraction of the value of the cruising boats at
resale time. Everything's relative, Bubbles.

Max



  #2   Report Post  
Capt. JG
 
Posts: n/a
Default Thank You JEFF!!!

Max, what do you believe is important when attempting to point? I think this
is a discussion worth having.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message

Hmmmm....seems few others agree with this. Even Loco and Steve have
said the higher pointing boat has the advantage.


Only if the skipper has the knowledge and experience to utilize that
advantage. The art of pointing involves a lot more than simply sailing as
closely to the wind as possible.

VMG across the widest
possible range is what determines perfomance. This is the essense of
sailing performance in fact.


VMG has more to do with the skipper than the boat. Paul Elvstrom proved
that for decades, sailing inferior boats against superior ones with
inferior skippers, and beating them easily.

Wish I'd written that!


What a lofty goal, to be able to coin a phrase suggesting something
blatantly obvious.

For a boat to be
considered high performance it must have excellent windward ability, be
fast off the wind and be stable downwind. A PDQ 36 is only fast off the
wind and not in light air. It MIGHT win a race...so long as the
conditions were pretty specific to it's advantages. My C&C 32 clobbered
a well sailed Gemini even though it was faster downwind.


It is conceivable that some Geminis are owned and sailed by incompetent
people.

Upwind it was
a dead duck, just like Jeff's boat would be. He already wrote that
tacking is tedious!
Get a clue...even a PDQ owner says you're wrong. The PDQ and other cats
like her are fantastic cruising boats for some folks, but sailing
enthusiasts still prefer First series boats, J-Boats, Swans, Swedens


Interesting that you include your boat with such a distinquished list of
yachts. Reminds me of a guy who used to boast that his Cosworth Vega was
in the same league as a Ferrari 248GTSi.

and the rest who comprise the cruiser/racer-racer/cruiser section of
the market. They're just more fun to sail, tack fast and can go upwind.


And your 35s5, compared with similarly-sized cruising boats, is cramped,
lightly constructed, uncomfortable in a seaway, and must be reefed early
and often, not to mention worth a fraction of the value of the cruising
boats at resale time. Everything's relative, Bubbles.

Max





  #3   Report Post  
Maxprop
 
Posts: n/a
Default Thank You JEFF!!!


"Capt. JG" wrote in message

Max, what do you believe is important when attempting to point? I think
this is a discussion worth having.


The fine art of pointing encompasses more than just having a boat that sails
closely to the wind. When racing, the weather course made good will depend
upon a number of factors. An adroit skipper can sail a higher CMG with a
boat that doesn't sail as closely to the wind than a poorer skipper will
with a boat that theoretically points higher. Keeping the boat on its feet
(upright) is one factor. Another is maintaining sufficient speed to be able
to periodically feather into the wind without slowing appreciably. This is
where skill really shines. Sailing a high CMG often requires footing off
periodically, especially in light air, to maintain boat speed to allow
feathering and to prevent leeward slippage. Puffs can enable a boat to
point higher as well, provided boat speed is maintained. Inexperienced
skippers tend to pinch when following faster boats--the perception is that
those boats are "pointing" higher than he, so he pinches in attempt to equal
their pointing ability, effectively slowing himself down and losing ground
to leeward. The direction in which the boat is aimed often has little to do
with how well the boat is "pointing."

There's more to it, but that's a good start.

Max


  #4   Report Post  
Capt. JG
 
Posts: n/a
Default Thank You JEFF!!!

Keeping a boat on it's feet vs. excessive heeling... that's what you're
saying right? Because zero heel may indicate pinching too much.

I'm not sure what you mean by feathering with respect to light air.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message

Max, what do you believe is important when attempting to point? I think
this is a discussion worth having.


The fine art of pointing encompasses more than just having a boat that
sails closely to the wind. When racing, the weather course made good will
depend upon a number of factors. An adroit skipper can sail a higher CMG
with a boat that doesn't sail as closely to the wind than a poorer skipper
will with a boat that theoretically points higher. Keeping the boat on
its feet (upright) is one factor. Another is maintaining sufficient speed
to be able to periodically feather into the wind without slowing
appreciably. This is where skill really shines. Sailing a high CMG often
requires footing off periodically, especially in light air, to maintain
boat speed to allow feathering and to prevent leeward slippage. Puffs can
enable a boat to point higher as well, provided boat speed is maintained.
Inexperienced skippers tend to pinch when following faster boats--the
perception is that those boats are "pointing" higher than he, so he
pinches in attempt to equal their pointing ability, effectively slowing
himself down and losing ground to leeward. The direction in which the
boat is aimed often has little to do with how well the boat is "pointing."

There's more to it, but that's a good start.

Max



  #5   Report Post  
Maxprop
 
Posts: n/a
Default Thank You JEFF!!!


"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
Keeping a boat on it's feet vs. excessive heeling... that's what you're
saying right? Because zero heel may indicate pinching too much.


No. There is no such thing as zero heel--a boat will always heel when
beating to windward unless it's a small dinghy with a 300lb. skipper and
similarly-sized crew. But limiting the heel to a practical minimum will
generally allow better helm control and less leeway slippage. It also keeps
the sailplan presented to the wind more optimally.

I'm not sure what you mean by feathering with respect to light air.


Feathering is the act of turning the boat into the wind (somewhat) during
puffs and when moving well, but it is done only briefly, with a feel for the
inevitable loss of speed that accompanies such a maneuver. At the first
sign of the boat beginning to slow, the boat is pulled back to its original
course. Learning to feather a boat to windward can make a big difference,
especially when attempting to make a mark that is just above the rhumb line.
Essentially it is the act of trading speed and momentum for pointing
ability. Feathering is difficult in light air, and ill advised in drifter
conditions.

Max





  #6   Report Post  
Capt. JG
 
Posts: n/a
Default Thank You JEFF!!!

Hmm... well, I think there is a spot when there's zero heel, but it may not
be sustainable upwind. Assuming no current and light wind, it seems like you
would want some heel.

I've always used the term heading up or pinching up. I guess you did say
something about falling off before attempting to heading up.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
Keeping a boat on it's feet vs. excessive heeling... that's what you're
saying right? Because zero heel may indicate pinching too much.


No. There is no such thing as zero heel--a boat will always heel when
beating to windward unless it's a small dinghy with a 300lb. skipper and
similarly-sized crew. But limiting the heel to a practical minimum will
generally allow better helm control and less leeway slippage. It also
keeps the sailplan presented to the wind more optimally.

I'm not sure what you mean by feathering with respect to light air.


Feathering is the act of turning the boat into the wind (somewhat) during
puffs and when moving well, but it is done only briefly, with a feel for
the inevitable loss of speed that accompanies such a maneuver. At the
first sign of the boat beginning to slow, the boat is pulled back to its
original course. Learning to feather a boat to windward can make a big
difference, especially when attempting to make a mark that is just above
the rhumb line. Essentially it is the act of trading speed and momentum
for pointing ability. Feathering is difficult in light air, and ill
advised in drifter conditions.

Max





  #7   Report Post  
Maxprop
 
Posts: n/a
Default Thank You JEFF!!!


"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...

Hmm... well, I think there is a spot when there's zero heel,


I'm open to learning under what conditions this may be true. I can't
conceive of it, however. If the boat is hard on the wind and there IS wind,
a boat will heel, unless it's one of those redundant-hull thingys that Oz
sails.

but it may not be sustainable upwind. Assuming no current and light wind,
it seems like you would want some heel.


You'll always have *some* heel, but minimizing it is advantageous for a
number of reasons. If this weren't true, why all the railmeat on maxi
boats? Dinghies are generally best sailed, in all but very light winds,
with a minimum of heel. Big boats are no different, unless they are
classics with long overhangs which increase effective waterline when heeled.


I've always used the term heading up or pinching up. I guess you did say
something about falling off before attempting to heading up.


I've always interpreted "pinching" as simply sailing too close to the wind.
An example would be a boat with the ability to sail at, say, 30 degrees to
the relative wind. Pinching would be to sail it along at 27 degrees, and
footing would be at 35 degrees, plus or minus. Feathering is, according to
Snipe guru Ted Wells, alternating between footing and pinching, but
maintaining speed by spending only that amount of time pinching that won't
denigrate boat speed significantly. It's an active process, with the
skipper moving the helm quite a bit.

There are some experienced skippers who prefer to find that sweet spot when
hard on the wind, holding the helm very still. I can generally outpoint
them, but they do seem to win their share of races. It's just another
school of thought.

Max


  #8   Report Post  
Capt. Rob
 
Posts: n/a
Default Thank You JEFF!!!

enthusiasts still prefer First series boats, J-Boats, Swans, Swedens

Interesting that you include your boat with such a distinquished list
of
yachts.


I've sailed the Sweden 39, J34c, J30 and J35. I have NOT sailed a Swan
yet. The cost of the swan not withstanding, the 35s5 is in the same
league for performance. In fact it was a hell of a lot nicer than the
nice J34c. The Sweden had better components, but tiny bunks...amazingly
small. A useless boat even for weekending if you're over 6 feet tall.
The J35 was fast and fun...if only it had a nicer cabin. The 35s5 was
simply one of the few boats that sailed like a raceboat while
maintaining a good interior for occasional cruising. Saying it's not
ideal for a 1000 mile voyage is rather silly since we didn't buy it for
that. It's also a poor boat to fly over the Grand Canyon as well.
I had a talk with Mark P. of Doyle sails this morning when I brought a
sail in for an insurance estimate. He owned a 36.7 for a while and is a
fan of the 35s5. We laughed at how we were once Beneteau bashers. He
said, "Yeah, that was me until I sailed a 35s5 and then a 36.7." As
luck would have it he built the sails on my boat and raced with her
owned many years ago aboard a S33.
Max, if you think the First 35s5 is lightly built, you should talk to
some surveyors who've worked the boat. It's built with many weight
saving featires, yet it's structural integrity is a match for most any
production cruiser. Rather than just denying this off the cuff I
suggest you look into it. Your impression on "lightly built" was also
mine. Then I learned a bit about the 345, 32s5 and 35s5 and why they
were standouts among the First series boats.

RB
35s5
NY

  #9   Report Post  
Maxprop
 
Posts: n/a
Default Thank You JEFF!!!


"Capt. Rob" wrote in message

enthusiasts still prefer First series boats, J-Boats, Swans, Swedens


Interesting that you include your boat with such a distinquished list
of
yachts.


I've sailed the Sweden 39, J34c, J30 and J35. I have NOT sailed a Swan
yet. The cost of the swan not withstanding, the 35s5 is in the same
league for performance.


*Performance* encompasses a lot more than just going fast. I'll take the
Swan any day. It will be heavier, but do far better than your Bendy Toy
over the broad range of conditions. You seem to be under the mistaken
impression that flat water and 15kts. is the standard by which "performance"
is judged.

In fact it was a hell of a lot nicer than the
nice J34c. The Sweden had better components, but tiny bunks...amazingly
small. A useless boat even for weekending if you're over 6 feet tall.
The J35 was fast and fun...if only it had a nicer cabin. The 35s5 was
simply one of the few boats that sailed like a raceboat while
maintaining a good interior for occasional cruising. Saying it's not
ideal for a 1000 mile voyage is rather silly since we didn't buy it for
that. It's also a poor boat to fly over the Grand Canyon as well.
I had a talk with Mark P. of Doyle sails this morning when I brought a
sail in for an insurance estimate. He owned a 36.7 for a while and is a
fan of the 35s5. We laughed at how we were once Beneteau bashers. He
said, "Yeah, that was me until I sailed a 35s5 and then a 36.7." As
luck would have it he built the sails on my boat and raced with her
owned many years ago aboard a S33.
Max, if you think the First 35s5 is lightly built, you should talk to
some surveyors who've worked the boat. It's built with many weight
saving featires, yet it's structural integrity is a match for most any
production cruiser.


You've been reading the Beneteau brochures, haven't ya. And believing them.

Rather than just denying this off the cuff I
suggest you look into it. Your impression on "lightly built" was also
mine. Then I learned a bit about the 345, 32s5 and 35s5 and why they
were standouts among the First series boats.


I've spent more time on Beneteaus than you, Bubbles. But that's not
necessarily significant--I state it only to explain that I'm far from
ignorant w/r/t Beneteaus. A good friend used to sell them in Chicago. So I
got the *Beneteau story*, and the *true story*. Fact is, they are really
very good boats--better, I think, than Hunters and Catalinas in most
respects. But Chantiers Beneteau's claim that they are great offshore
passagemakers is more advertising hype than reality. Sure, they bond their
bulkheads 360 degrees to the hull *liner* and deck *liner*, but that's not
quite the same as bonding them to the hull and deck. Beneteau's hull liners
have been known to separate from the hull, requiring extensive repair costs
often without effecting a valid repair. AND their bulkheads, fairly lightly
constructed, have been known to buckle and fail when pushed to extremes that
would probably not damage a stout cruiser, such as a Hallberg Rassey or a
Cabo Rico, for example.

However I think the most significant thing you've stated is that you used to
bash Beneteaus. I recall that very well--you were without mercy. Now that
you own one, there are few boats that can compare with your 35s5. Sounds
like owner prejudice, plain and simple, to me.

Max


  #10   Report Post  
Capt. Rob
 
Posts: n/a
Default Thank You JEFF!!!

*Performance* encompasses a lot more than just going fast. I'll take
the
Swan any day.

Wow...you really went out on a limb there! Next you'll tell us that
you'd take Pam Anderson over Judy Dench.

But Chantiers Beneteau's claim that they are great offshore
passagemakers is more advertising hype than reality.

Honestly, we won't take Thomas into dangerous conditions offshore in
any boat.

Now that
you own one, there are few boats that can compare with your 35s5.
Sounds
like owner prejudice, plain and simple, to me.

That IS a VERY valid point. In this case it came down to education
about some of the Beneteau line. I don't have a high opinion of the
latest Beneteau boats, especially the Oceanus series. Did you know that
brokers are currently fighting with BeneteauUSA to make fit and finish
improvements because quality has fallen badly? Go look at a new
one...even a First series. Mark at Doyle loved the way his 36.7 sailed,
but said the interior is crap compared to my boat. Of course we
observed this ourselves. He himself laughed that he was a Beneteau
basher...and then he sailed a first series boat. The combo of
performance and cruisability for these waters is essentially unmatched
anywhere near the price.
Go ahead...try to match it. Doug couldn't.
That's not to say the 35s5 is ideal for everyone. It's a handful at
times and requires more work to sail than say a Catalina 40 or Island
Packet 35. But that's what we wanted!
All I can add is that we took Windward First out in some pretty heavy
wind and chop and it was simply a blast! Reefed under main alone, she
still sailed like a quick dinghy and aside from the howling wind, it
was very relaxed and composed. This is a great boat for the LIS area.

RB
35s5
NY



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Well, Jeff? Capt. Rob ASA 13 November 12th 05 02:04 PM
Multi Hulls Capsize in Yacht Race Steve Thomas ASA 25 November 9th 05 12:12 PM
A Ship of Fools Capt. Rob ASA 39 November 4th 05 01:42 PM
A Recreational Boating Message Skipper General 7 October 12th 05 10:25 PM
A Recreational Boating Message Skipper General 0 October 12th 05 06:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017