I think I'll comment about whatever I decide to comment about... but thanks
for your input.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Red Cloud®" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:00:33 -0700, "JG" wrote:

They're a piece of work. Neal bragged about reporting me for weeks on end.
Then, when he decided he was too cheap to pay for individual.net and/or
got
tossed, he and his "girlfriend" signed up with an ISP on par with pond
scum
and invited back all the low lifes that have no life other than supporting
their own egos. Neal and LP (man or woman, who knows) are really sad
people.

Who asked you? I sure didn't. Shut up.

rusty redcloud

On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 23:25:36 GMT, "John Cairns"
wrote:


"Fred Hall" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 22:57:31 GMT, "John Cairns"
wrote:


"Scotty" wrote in message
egroups.com...
I'm with Jon on this one (gulp). neal / LP / assholes that are doing
this deserve to be reported (netkkkopped) . I 'd do it myself if I knew
how.

SBV


Scotty, nil is a troll, plain and simple, always has been, always will be.
The best way to deal with nil and his ilk is to ignore them. Feed a troll
and he won't go away until you stop feeding him.If you have to kf nil and
whomever to accomplish this, fine. The rest, since I don't use google as a
newsreader, the flonking folks have been kind enough to post all of their
messages in a big group, can just delete them wholesale. No big deal.

That sounds sensible. What is your stance on netKKKoping?

Philosophically, I am opposed to the idea of reporting someone for a
violation of their TOS. The thing is, the "violations" that we're reported
were the type that no person with half an ounce of wit or style would
defend, I would have to say that most would feel a little embarrassed to
take the side of a pedophile. Best bet for the "victim" of abusive posts is
to kf the offender(s), especially if it's going to bother them enough to
report it.

That's the way it's supposed to work. Who is the pedophile you
mention? Ganz?


John Cairns

,




John Cairns

Awk! Caught a small crappie. Throw it back, too small, and stupid.

Scotty


"Soque (Enjoque) Pupette" wrote in message
...
Scotty wrote:
I'm with Jon on this one (gulp). neal / LP / assholes that are
doing
this deserve to be reported (netkkkopped) . I 'd do it myself if I
knew
how.

Bull****. You're trying to troll.

You are trying to provoke the other side just to perpetuate the
fight.


this space reserved for you to declare your seriousness


--
,,,
.oo
c
- Soque

"Capt. Neal®" wrote ...

Most of the reason people like
Scotty and RedClod barf on our every word is because they can't
stand
the fact that an old, wrinkled, fat, ugly, disgusting 85-year-old,
prune like
you has found a soul and sex mate in a mentally challenged,
impotent,
juvenile delinquent , pedophile ,pretend sailor like me.

xoxoxo,
CN

What would you expect from someone living in a 27' boat? A Craponado
at that.

Scotty



"Red Cloud®" wrote in message

Someone stick neal with a fork. He's so completely done.

rusty redcloud

"Fred Hall" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 23:25:36 GMT, "John Cairns"
wrote:


"Fred Hall" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 22:57:31 GMT, "John Cairns"
wrote:


"Scotty" wrote in message
legroups.com...
I'm with Jon on this one (gulp). neal / LP / assholes that are doing
this deserve to be reported (netkkkopped) . I 'd do it myself if I
knew
how.

SBV


Scotty, nil is a troll, plain and simple, always has been, always will
be.
The best way to deal with nil and his ilk is to ignore them. Feed a
troll
and he won't go away until you stop feeding him.If you have to kf nil
and
whomever to accomplish this, fine. The rest, since I don't use google as
a
newsreader, the flonking folks have been kind enough to post all of
their
messages in a big group, can just delete them wholesale. No big deal.

That sounds sensible. What is your stance on netKKKoping?

Philosophically, I am opposed to the idea of reporting someone for a
violation of their TOS. The thing is, the "violations" that we're reported
were the type that no person with half an ounce of wit or style would
defend, I would have to say that most would feel a little embarrassed to
take the side of a pedophile. Best bet for the "victim" of abusive posts
is
to kf the offender(s), especially if it's going to bother them enough to
report it.

That's the way it's supposed to work. Who is the pedophile you
mention? Ganz?

Nil.

John Cairns




John Cairns

,




John Cairns

"Fred Hall" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 19:03:05 GMT, "John Cairns"
wrote:


"Fred Hall" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 23:25:36 GMT, "John Cairns"
wrote:


"Fred Hall" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 22:57:31 GMT, "John Cairns"
wrote:


"Scotty" wrote in message
oglegroups.com...
I'm with Jon on this one (gulp). neal / LP / assholes that are doing
this deserve to be reported (netkkkopped) . I 'd do it myself if I
knew
how.

SBV


Scotty, nil is a troll, plain and simple, always has been, always will
be.
The best way to deal with nil and his ilk is to ignore them. Feed a
troll
and he won't go away until you stop feeding him.If you have to kf nil
and
whomever to accomplish this, fine. The rest, since I don't use google
as
a
newsreader, the flonking folks have been kind enough to post all of
their
messages in a big group, can just delete them wholesale. No big deal.

That sounds sensible. What is your stance on netKKKoping?

Philosophically, I am opposed to the idea of reporting someone for a
violation of their TOS. The thing is, the "violations" that we're
reported
were the type that no person with half an ounce of wit or style would
defend, I would have to say that most would feel a little embarrassed to
take the side of a pedophile. Best bet for the "victim" of abusive posts
is
to kf the offender(s), especially if it's going to bother them enough to
report it.

That's the way it's supposed to work. Who is the pedophile you
mention? Ganz?

Nil.

Shocking. You do have proof of this, right?

http://tinylink.com/?X8ObeBHXsd

John Cairns



John Cairns




John Cairns

,




John Cairns

"John Cairns" wrote in message ...

"Fred Hall" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 19:03:05 GMT, "John Cairns"
wrote:


"Fred Hall" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 23:25:36 GMT, "John Cairns"
wrote:


"Fred Hall" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 22:57:31 GMT, "John Cairns"
wrote:


"Scotty" wrote in message
ooglegroups.com...
I'm with Jon on this one (gulp). neal / LP / assholes that are doing
this deserve to be reported (netkkkopped) . I 'd do it myself if I
knew
how.

SBV


Scotty, nil is a troll, plain and simple, always has been, always will
be.
The best way to deal with nil and his ilk is to ignore them. Feed a
troll
and he won't go away until you stop feeding him.If you have to kf nil
and
whomever to accomplish this, fine. The rest, since I don't use google
as
a
newsreader, the flonking folks have been kind enough to post all of
their
messages in a big group, can just delete them wholesale. No big deal.

That sounds sensible. What is your stance on netKKKoping?

Philosophically, I am opposed to the idea of reporting someone for a
violation of their TOS. The thing is, the "violations" that we're
reported
were the type that no person with half an ounce of wit or style would
defend, I would have to say that most would feel a little embarrassed to
take the side of a pedophile. Best bet for the "victim" of abusive posts
is
to kf the offender(s), especially if it's going to bother them enough to
report it.

That's the way it's supposed to work. Who is the pedophile you
mention? Ganz?

Nil.

Shocking. You do have proof of this, right?

http://tinylink.com/?X8ObeBHXsd

John Cairns


That's supposed to be proof Capt. Neal is a pedophile? You had better
get your head checked. Since when is NOT having sex with an underage
girl pedophilia?

Sad that trolling up people like you who have pedophile tendencies to such
an extent that you obsess about troll posts years later (and probably beat
off to them) is so easy.

CN

"John Cairns" wrote in message

John???...... all that said was he acted correctly under the circumstances.
This does not state in any way that he engaged in carnal knowledge with a
minor.

Just some points....

What his opinions are... are plainly inconsequential.

A true pedophile would not have turned down that opportunity.

If true , that young girl was most likely subjected to sexual abuse at home.

The entire diatribe could be a ruse to promote discussion or just a plain
troll.



Cripes I'm not as goofy as you ... even after a half bottle of rum and
painkillers!

CM

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:ggBae.59084$vt1.6224@edtnps90...

"John Cairns" wrote in message

John???...... all that said was he acted correctly under the circumstances.
This does not state in any way that he engaged in carnal knowledge with a
minor.

Just some points....

What his opinions are... are plainly inconsequential.

A true pedophile would not have turned down that opportunity.

If true , that young girl was most likely subjected to sexual abuse at home.

The entire diatribe could be a ruse to promote discussion or just a plain
troll.



Cripes I'm not as goofy as you ... even after a half bottle of rum and
painkillers!

CM

And, you obviously don't have pedophile tendencies like the people who
overreact and obsess years later like you know who . . .

CN