Hank Rearden wrote:
Gravity can be controlled electromagnetically.

Time can be controlled gravimetrically.




"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...
Not sure who Art Bell is...But I can tell you I did find information
from the Bell project useful in designing my Juju extracter.

Just incase you did not know about it the 'Bell project' of the German
SS under Gen. H. Kammler was a Nazi counterpart to the 'Philadelphia
Experiment' undertaken to determine whether gravity could be controlled
electromagnetically.

Of course they were just as confused as Einstein. And failed to grasp
some basics of the structure of energy.

Joe





--
,,,
..oo
c
- Soque

Time is a local phenomena and invariant under changing gravimetric
potential.

Henry

Hank Rearden wrote:
Time is a local phenomena and invariant under changing gravimetric
potential.

Cascade breaker! Hrrrrmph!

and....um....

The distant observer doesn't see it that way.

--
,,,
..oo
c
- Soque

The distant observer hasn't seen it at all. For him, the event hasn't even
happened yet.
But that doesn't stop him from harvesting energy from the fringing fields of
the Casimir gradient.

Henry

your an idiot Hank, Henry whoever.

All the energy in a closed system is constant. So if energy is "made"
in one area, it must have come from some other area in the system. This
means that it is impossible to set up a perpetually moving mechanism
without an outside source of energy, as no motion can occur without
using energy.
Energy cannot be transferred from an area of lower energy to an area of
higher energy, without some external effect being felt in the system.
So all systems must evolve from coherence to a state of randomness due
to random external effects caused by energy fluctuations.

Casimer was a quack.

Joe

Joe

All the energy in a closed system is constant.

There's only one closed system in nature. That is the entire universe.


So if energy is "made"
in one area, it must have come from some other area in the system.

Only if your system is the entire universe. Otherwise it can easily come
from another system and, in experience, often does. People are still trying
to find the source of excess energy from the Pons-Flieschman experiments.



This
means that it is impossible to set up a perpetually moving mechanism
without an outside source of energy, as no motion can occur without
using energy.

This would violate the law of inertia. An object in motion stays in motion
unless acted upon by an outside force. An object moving along in free space
at any speed consumes no energy.

The law of inertia describes perpetual motion. In fact, the motion is
perpetual if no energy is added or removed from the system.

Where does the energy come from to induce additional rotation in the
Lens-Thirring effect?



Energy cannot be transferred from an area of lower energy to an area of
higher energy, without some external effect being felt in the system.

Is the effect external to/ outside of the system? If so, then it is not a
closed system and your sweeping macroscopic generalizations would not apply,
since they are valid only for closed systems.


So all systems must evolve from coherence to a state of randomness due
to random external effects caused by energy fluctuations.


Randomness is a mathematical concept used to describe or measure physical
systems. Randomness is not a force of nature, is not a physical process and
is not a cause for an effect. Randomness is used to describe aggregate
phenomena after it has occured.

In almost all systems coherence is the lowest energy state. Do some research
on oscillators.

All the energy in a closed system is constant.


There's only one closed system in nature. That is the entire universe.

The universe is not a closed system.


So if energy is "made"
in one area, it must have come from some other area in the system.


Only if your system is the entire universe. Otherwise it can easily
come
from another system and, in experience, often does. People are still
trying
to find the source of excess energy from the Pons-Flieschman
experiments.


They are retards following a shoddy scam. Pons-Flieschman could never
re-produce his claimed cold fusion.





This
means that it is impossible to set up a perpetually moving mechanism
without an outside source of energy, as no motion can occur without
using energy.


This would violate the law of inertia. An object in motion stays in
motion
unless acted upon by an outside force. An object moving along in free
space
at any speed consumes no energy.

Wrong....Energy was used to put it the object in motion.

The law of inertia describes perpetual motion. In fact, the motion is
perpetual if no energy is added or removed from the system.

See above...the key is nothing added or removed. It requires energy to
put anything in motion therefore it is not perpetual.


Where does the energy come from to induce additional rotation in the
Lens-Thirring effect?

The rotation field, whether caused by a linearly moving mass or a
rotating object, only affects moving masses. However, there is of
course a much stronger associated acceleration field which affects
all masses. From the subjective point of view, the acceleration field
may appear to be partly linear acceleration and partly "centrifugal"
force associated with rotary motion, but this is a higher-order effect.


Energy cannot be transferred from an area of lower energy to an area
of
higher energy, without some external effect being felt in the system.



Is the effect external to/ outside of the system? If so, then it is not
a
closed system and your sweeping macroscopic generalizations would not
apply,
since they are valid only for closed systems.

They are indeed external


So all systems must evolve from coherence to a state of randomness
due
to random external effects caused by energy fluctuations.


Randomness is a mathematical concept used to describe or measure
physical
systems. Randomness is not a force of nature, is not a physical process
and
is not a cause for an effect.

There is no concept of randomness OUTSIDE of a
caused system. What we call randomness in non
living nature is just the laws of physics working
as a massive complex web of laws; randomness does
not really exist in physics.



Randomness is used to describe aggregate
phenomena after it has occured.

In almost all systems coherence is the lowest energy state. Do some
research
on oscillators.

Why?

Joe

Hank Rearden wrote:
The distant observer hasn't seen it at all. For him, the event hasn't even
happened yet.

It will. An he'll notice the effect of the curvature of spacetime
on the properties of the mechanism conveying the information.
(redshifted photons)

--
,,,
..oo
c
- Soque

How does one measure the curvature of space time?



"Soque (Enjoque) Pupette" wrote in message
...
Hank Rearden wrote:
The distant observer hasn't seen it at all. For him, the event hasn't
even
happened yet.

It will. An he'll notice the effect of the curvature of spacetime
on the properties of the mechanism conveying the information.
(redshifted photons)

--
,,,
.oo
c
- Soque

Thats easy Hank,

Curvature can be measured entirely within a surface, and similarly
within a higher-dimensional manifold such as space or spacetime. On
earth, if you start at the North Pole, sail south for about 10,000 km
(to the Equator), turn left by 90 degrees, Sail for 10,000 more km, and
then do the same again (sail for 10,000 more km, turn left by 90
degrees, sail for 10,000 more km), you will be back where you started.
Such a triangle with three right angles is only possible because the
surface of the earth is curved. The curvature of spacetime can be
evaluated, and indeed given meaning, in a similar way. Spaces of only
two dimensions, however, require only one quantity, the Gaussian or
scalar curvature, to quantify their curvature. In more dimensions,
curvature is quantified by the Riemann tensor. This tensor describes
how a vector that is moved along a curve parallel to itself changes
when a round trip is made. In flat space the vector returns to the same
orientation, but in a curved space it generally does not.

Joe