Nothing wrong with profit Joe. But everyone who works hard should have
something to show for it.
Scout

"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...

Capt. Neal® wrote:
"Scout" wrote in message
...
So our founding fathers, who believed in strength through unity,
were socialists?

Bwaahahhahahahhah. You are definitely a product of the liberal public
educational system. You learned a slanted view of what our founding
fathers were all about. Our founding fathers believed in strength
through
individualism and hard work.

Our founding fathers feared a strong central government and the
socialism
and repression of individualism it represents. They worked hard at
writing
guarantees of freedom and individuality into the Constitution but
liberal
judges and lawyers have whittled away at the Constitution and passed
so
many laws directly contrary to it (income tax for example) that is
has
beed diluted and *******ized.

Or is unity a good thing only when some greedy ******* profits from
it?
Scout

The term "greedy *******s profiting" is right out of MoveON.org. It
tells
me that liberals have a problem with free enterprise so they renamed
it
something that sounds un-American. They did this because they are
either
too lazy or too stupid to understand free enterprise and how and why
it built the greatest country in the world. Funny how a good word
like
'profit' is made to sound un-American by you liberals.

CN

BRAVO ! Well said Capt.

Joe







"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...
[snip]
You are for labor unions - their time has come and gone - and
being for labor unions is about as liberal as one can get. Labor
unions are socialistic by their very nature. Get a grip.

"Scout" wrote in message ...
Nothing wrong with profit Joe. But everyone who works hard should have
something to show for it.
Scout

Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that
everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of it.

If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show
for it that is his own choice and his own responsibility.

You have the choice to work hard for something or to work hard for
nothing. Because you choose to work hard for nothing, don't attempt
to make others give you a share of what they have worked hard for
something. If you don't like being a common laborer barely scraping
by with nothing to show for it then quit, educate yourself and get a
real job. It's that easy.

Please stop your whining about something you have complete control
over.

CN

that's just perversion of a more noble idea.
Scout

"Capt. Neal®" wrote
Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that
everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of it.
If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show for it
that is his own choice and his own responsibility.

Being?

"Scout" wrote in message ...
that's just perversion of a more noble idea.
Scout

"Capt. Neal®" wrote
Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of
it.
If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show for it that is his own choice and his own responsibility.

It's obvious that you, Capt Neal, reign supreme as a Master Mariner over
this newsgroup. I took note of your quick detection of a sense of
entitlement from Scout there. That is one of the essential traits of
Liberalism. It is an attempt to thwart reality by assuming that something is
owed you (obviously from someone else).

If a liberal is alone in the woods and a tree falls and lands on his leg,
pinning him to the ground, is he entitled to help?

"Ask not what your country can force others to do for you".

Amen!

Bob Crantz

"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...

Being?

"Scout" wrote in message
...
that's just perversion of a more noble idea.
Scout

"Capt. Neal®" wrote
Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that
everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of
it.
If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show for it
that is his own choice and his own responsibility.

"Bob Crantz" wrote

If a liberal is alone in the woods and a tree falls and lands on his
leg,
pinning him to the ground, is he entitled to help?

No, but that won't stop him from suing the Forestry Service, any land
developer within 500 miles, the manufacturer of his pants and shoes,
the local gov't for not posting warning labels on trees, the publisher
of the guide book he was using, the local trucking co., and he'll
blame it all on Pres. Bush.

Scotty

Good satire Bob. Does anyone else here realize that your landover posts are
the epitome of liberalism?
Scout

"Bob Crantz" wrote in message
ink.net...
It's obvious that you, Capt Neal, reign supreme as a Master Mariner over
this newsgroup. I took note of your quick detection of a sense of
entitlement from Scout there. That is one of the essential traits of
Liberalism. It is an attempt to thwart reality by assuming that something
is
owed you (obviously from someone else).

If a liberal is alone in the woods and a tree falls and lands on his leg,
pinning him to the ground, is he entitled to help?

"Ask not what your country can force others to do for you".

Amen!

Bob Crantz

"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...

Being?

"Scout" wrote in message
...
that's just perversion of a more noble idea.
Scout

"Capt. Neal®" wrote
Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that
everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of
it.
If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show for
it
that is his own choice and his own responsibility.

Shhhhh.....Neal doesn't get it...

"Scout" wrote in message
...
Good satire Bob. Does anyone else here realize that your landover posts
are the epitome of liberalism?
Scout

"Bob Crantz" wrote in message
ink.net...
It's obvious that you, Capt Neal, reign supreme as a Master Mariner over
this newsgroup. I took note of your quick detection of a sense of
entitlement from Scout there. That is one of the essential traits of
Liberalism. It is an attempt to thwart reality by assuming that something
is
owed you (obviously from someone else).

If a liberal is alone in the woods and a tree falls and lands on his leg,
pinning him to the ground, is he entitled to help?

"Ask not what your country can force others to do for you".

Amen!

Bob Crantz

"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...

Being?

"Scout" wrote in message
...
that's just perversion of a more noble idea.
Scout

"Capt. Neal®" wrote
Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that
everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of
it.
If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show for
it
that is his own choice and his own responsibility.

"Scout" wrote in message
...
Good satire Bob. Does anyone else here realize that your landover
posts are
the epitome of liberalism?


No, we're all just a bunch of dumb hicks.

.. . . that being comfortable with the few profiting from the hard work of
the many, while the many receive no profit, is to be comfortable with
slavery, which doesn't surprise me a bit.


"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...

Being?

"Scout" wrote in message
...
that's just perversion of a more noble idea.
Scout

"Capt. Neal®" wrote
Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that
everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of it.
If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show for it
that is his own choice and his own responsibility.