Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
kATY DIDN'T SEND ME ANY cHRISTMAS EMAIL THIS YEAR AT ALL.
I am so let down and disappointed. So sad.... Bob Crantz "Lady Pilot" wrote in message news:KUHXd.8$N15.5@okepread06... "katysails" wrote: To set this all straight, this "war" started when LP began to send me Bible tracts at my email address afterr I dressed up like a gypsy on Halloween for the old folks....she then alluded that the message of those tracts had something to do with God's displeasure with me and that punishment would be forthcoming...this was in the advent of my granddaughter's accident... Yes, katysails, let's get this all straight, shall we? You e-mailed me on 11-12-04 asking me to pray for your grand daughter, which I did fervently. In only *one* e-mail on 11-15-04 I responded to your e-mail about your gd with a couple of scriptures. Since you asked me to pray, I just assumed you were a Christian. On 11-20-04, I e-mailed katy to ask for an update on her gd. Katy replied on 11-22-04 asking me and I quote, "keep praying, please." The next correspondence with katy came on 12-22-04 when katy e-mailed me comics on an e-mailed with the subject: The lighter side of the season, which was also e-mailed to Scotty, Seahag and Flying Tadpole among others. Then on 12-24-04 Katy e-mailed me with the subject: Merry Christmas, which others named above were carbon copied, but this time included Peter Wiley and Capt. Neal. I have all e-mails if anyone requires further proof of katy's lies. So tell me why Katy would continue to e-mail me if she was so offended about a couple of scriptures from the Holy Bible I added to an e-mail? Wouldn't it seem more likely that she would have started flaming me 11-01-04 instead of after I went sailing on 2-10-05? I plonked her out of my personal email so I don't know if she continued to try or not..I don't check my spam box... That's pretty funny, considering I never even answered your last e-mail to me. lol my allusions to her sons were to the effect that what kind of woman leaves her kids at home to go sailing with someone she doesn't know from a ng for 9 days? This shows what little you are aware of concerning Capt. Neal and I... I would fill you in on the details, but it's none of your business. I will say that Capt. Neal has been to my house, met my boys who adore him, not to mention my friends. Even my ex-husband checked him out through law enforcement and found that Capt. Neal has an impeccable record. So much for your libel about the good Capt. on usenet! So you are saying that for me to leave my boys with their biological aunt (which has a masters degree at the university in Child Development) and uncle, not to mention paternal grandparents (that leaped at the opportunity to spend time with their grandson's, even after I returned home) that I'm somehow not a fit parent? I assure you that my son's weren't running the busy street's in front of McDonald's, especially the 11 year old. Even my 15 year old doesn't get to run the busy streets, unlike your grand daughter; I'm a better mother than that. One kind, to my mind...but that's namecalling and there's been enough of that. What I did say is that her sons seemed to be lacking guidance...or maybe needed a father figure...they certainly need someone if she's gone for 9 days at a time... Maybe your grand daughter needs a "father figure"? I did not impugn their mentality, their decision making, or any other personal attribute. Sure you did, katy. Let's look on google on 2-20-05: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...b?dmode=source Katy wrote: I can understand, though, why someone trapped in Oklahoma with a bunch of unruly high school boys would want to escape...even you must have looked pretty good... end quote So tell me katy, why would you say that my boys (who aren't in high school yet) are unruly? That was an intentional lie right there, unless you can point to something you know about my sons that I don't. What I do impugn is her judgment as a mother. She's now residing in the same cave that BB and BS and Ganz all share. I thought they'd like the entertainment value... Bwaawhawhaaaa! That's a lie also, I can tell just by reading your post that you read every one of my posts and stewed about them all night long. BTW, I don't know what a "refoinder" is as noted in the subject line of your whinning post, but a *rejoinder* is usually considered a quick and witty reply. I didn't see any of that in your final declaration of defeat in our catfight. LP |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
final kayak decision | Touring | |||
How to qualify 120 boats for final Gold/Silver fleets | General | |||
unusual docking situation | ASA |