Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Heck, Max and I both sat out 100 mph straight line winds on the same dock
one spring...was no picnic but we did it...I imagine most people who really sail have sat out some kind of storm event one way or the other... OzOne wrote in message ... On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 05:20:05 GMT, "Maxprop" scribbled thusly: OzOne wrote in message news ![]() On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 18:26:36 GMT, "Maxprop" scribbled thusly: OzOne wrote in message Bloody hard to move a house Cappy! Not really. Andrew did just fine in that regard. Max Yeah, and Cappy just "rode it out". It was significantly attenuated where he was. Max Yep, but he still brags about sitting at anchor in 45kts of hurricane. Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. |
#82
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's not the case, from my observations. Given two equally prepped
pieces of wood, the Cetol will outlast varnish by about 10% at most, and require about 10% less work to maintain. Maxprop wrote: The biggest difference between the two that I've found is the technique and care required during application. I'm good with a brush, but it still takes me far longer and with far more care to apply a coat of varnish vs. Cetol. Maybe I'm getting to be a fussy old fogey, but it seems totally natural to me to be careful like that. Modern varnishes (at least the high-dollar stuff) is nowhere near as temperamental as the old time spar varnish I remember. My wife uses foam brushes... still have to be careful about bubbles, but it's pretty quick and easy. I'm wavering on the foam brush thing, it seems sinful to me. .... And weather is another factor. I've applied Cetol in 45 degrees and wind, and also in 90 degrees and humidity, both with acceptable results. Varnish requires a narrower set of parameters if the finish coat is to have a smooth, glasslike appearance. That's very true. Especially dust & humidity. ... Then of course there is the issue of sanding between coats. Cetol requires none as it bonds chemically to itself, but varnish requires a mechanical bond between coats, so sanding is obligatory. Actually (depending on the varnish you use) it's not. All sanding does is produce a lot of dust and require cleanup. The pro we had going over our brightwork originally gave us a lot of pointers on this. He said that most people sand way too much and don't clean up after well enough. Bristol and Epifanes both make a good high-build high-UV-resistant finish that isn't supposed to be sanded between coats, once the surface is good. The new clear stuff doesn't look as bad as the old orange Jell-O Cetol, but it still doesn't look good up close. I honestly can't tell much difference between the two. Maybe you haven't looked well enough. Up close, the difference is obvious. From ten feet away, it's not obvious but visible. If a boat with really sharp varnished brightwork parked next to you, people would say "Boy that Sea Sprite sure is a pretty boat, what a dang shame about the woodwork." If the wood has pretty enough grain to be worth any type of bright finish, it deserves varnish IMHO. Have you ever tried Epifanes Gloss Wood Finish? Yep. I'm not positive but IIRC that's what's on the tugboat right now. BTW we had a professional do some of the wood on our boat when we first bought it, the former owner had slapped on a terrible coating of polyurethane. He also takes care of a number of boats with Cetol and he swears the stuff is actually more work than varnish. I've heard that before, and don't believe it for a moment. Well, this guy makes a pretty good living at it and knows a lot more than I do... I can't believe somebody would pay money for a pro job and want Cetol but apparently a lot do (including two in our marina). ... Perhaps when we retire to Oriental, we'll reconsider varnish for the brightwork. That part of NC (around New Bern as well) is getting to be worse than Florida. They're four-laning the highway to Oriental, so that the blue-hairs will have an easier time. But hey, there's plenty of room for more! We noted the road work when we were there last year. Not too many bluehairs when we were there, but no doubt they'll come. They always do. They're already there. That daily 3 truckloads of New York newspapers and 2 truckloads of froo-froo coffee isn't for consumption by locals. ![]() Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#83
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maxprop wrote:
Another exception is the Graham & Schlageter-designed S2 35 CC. It was a lower-volume center cockpit boat built on a racing hull, and it was amazingly fast, especially downwind, but it wasn't beautiful. Nothing on our part of Lake Michigan, short of a maxi, could outrun that beast. I've heard of them, neer seen one in person. There were two S-2 9.2cc in our marina, one owned by some good friends... both sailed pretty respectably even if they weren't center cockpit boats. I like S-2 boats. DSK |
#84
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scot,
Temp got up to 62' yesterday, on the boat. Dog and I got in a evening sail. Did come home in the dark and on the motor but first evening sail of '05. Temp in the back yard 40 deg at 6:15 AM very foggy. Have a lunch appointment so it really doesn't matter. Maybe another short sail this evening without dog. I'm sure she won't mind :^) Ole Thom http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsPage |
#85
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Katy & Joe;
It was in a Storm such as is blewing in Oz's land, that all but ruined "Bull" Halsey reputation when he took the fleet to sea off Japan. They took a hell of a pounding. Ole Thom |
#86
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Consider yourself fortunate, and appreciate it.
SV "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Scot, Temp got up to 62' yesterday, on the boat. Dog and I got in a evening sail. Did come home in the dark and on the motor but first evening sail of '05. Temp in the back yard 40 deg at 6:15 AM very foggy. Have a lunch appointment so it really doesn't matter. Maybe another short sail this evening without dog. I'm sure she won't mind :^) Ole Thom http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsPage |
#87
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah...ditto...we're 20 degrees lower than the average for the whole month
and it's snowing and icing again...I guess the ski resorts will be happy with all the spring skiing but it sure is playing havoc with the rest of us who want to get on with it....dang Canadian clippers... "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... Consider yourself fortunate, and appreciate it. SV "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Scot, Temp got up to 62' yesterday, on the boat. Dog and I got in a evening sail. Did come home in the dark and on the motor but first evening sail of '05. Temp in the back yard 40 deg at 6:15 AM very foggy. Have a lunch appointment so it really doesn't matter. Maybe another short sail this evening without dog. I'm sure she won't mind :^) Ole Thom http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsPage |
#88
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guess they should have been sailing Crapanado 27's...
"Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Katy & Joe; It was in a Storm such as is blewing in Oz's land, that all but ruined "Bull" Halsey reputation when he took the fleet to sea off Japan. They took a hell of a pounding. Ole Thom |
#89
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message Maxprop wrote: Another exception is the Graham & Schlageter-designed S2 35 CC. It was a lower-volume center cockpit boat built on a racing hull, and it was amazingly fast, especially downwind, but it wasn't beautiful. Nothing on our part of Lake Michigan, short of a maxi, could outrun that beast. I've heard of them, neer seen one in person. There were two S-2 9.2cc in our marina, one owned by some good friends... both sailed pretty respectably even if they weren't center cockpit boats. I like S-2 boats. S2s were built up here in Holland, Michigan. The owner of the company was a gent named Leon Slikkers, a displaced Dutchman, who started out building Slikcraft powerboats, then sold his company to AMF, and was barred from building powerboats for a period of ten years by the sale contract. So he built sailboats, and some of the early S2s were among the ugliest, worst performing pieces of high quality junk ever produced. He was a quick study, however, and hired Graham and Schlageter to design his line of cruiser/racers, and Arthur Edmonds (I think) to design the cruisers. The results were exceptionally well-built boats with lots of upgrade features. And they were good sailing machines. The G&S designed 35' CC was one of his last sailing designs, and it was too bad it wasn't expanded upon into larger boats. They were deceptively fast and beautifully constructed, if not particularly beautiful aesthetically. Slikkers is back building powerboats (Tiara), but he claims he'll build a fleet of 6 or 7 7.9 Grand Slam racers if someone will give him an order and 50% down. Yeah, sure. Max |
#90
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Too bad they're making Tiara's now...what a comedown....but Max is right
about that S-2...that thing was FAST....smokin fast....BTW, Max, who ended up buying her and where did she go? "Maxprop" wrote in message . net... "DSK" wrote in message Maxprop wrote: Another exception is the Graham & Schlageter-designed S2 35 CC. It was a lower-volume center cockpit boat built on a racing hull, and it was amazingly fast, especially downwind, but it wasn't beautiful. Nothing on our part of Lake Michigan, short of a maxi, could outrun that beast. I've heard of them, neer seen one in person. There were two S-2 9.2cc in our marina, one owned by some good friends... both sailed pretty respectably even if they weren't center cockpit boats. I like S-2 boats. S2s were built up here in Holland, Michigan. The owner of the company was a gent named Leon Slikkers, a displaced Dutchman, who started out building Slikcraft powerboats, then sold his company to AMF, and was barred from building powerboats for a period of ten years by the sale contract. So he built sailboats, and some of the early S2s were among the ugliest, worst performing pieces of high quality junk ever produced. He was a quick study, however, and hired Graham and Schlageter to design his line of cruiser/racers, and Arthur Edmonds (I think) to design the cruisers. The results were exceptionally well-built boats with lots of upgrade features. And they were good sailing machines. The G&S designed 35' CC was one of his last sailing designs, and it was too bad it wasn't expanded upon into larger boats. They were deceptively fast and beautifully constructed, if not particularly beautiful aesthetically. Slikkers is back building powerboats (Tiara), but he claims he'll build a fleet of 6 or 7 7.9 Grand Slam racers if someone will give him an order and 50% down. Yeah, sure. Max |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Are polls taking a toll? | General | |||
Bush Blunders Taking a Toll | General | |||
Some chilling thoughts on winter boating. | General | |||
FS: Kover Klamp Winter Framing Kit in MA | Marketplace |