LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #81   Report Post  
katysails
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Heck, Max and I both sat out 100 mph straight line winds on the same dock
one spring...was no picnic but we did it...I imagine most people who really
sail have sat out some kind of storm event one way or the other...

OzOne wrote in message ...
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 05:20:05 GMT, "Maxprop"
scribbled thusly:


OzOne wrote in message
news
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 18:26:36 GMT, "Maxprop"
scribbled thusly:


OzOne wrote in message

Bloody hard to move a house Cappy!

Not really. Andrew did just fine in that regard.

Max


Yeah, and Cappy just "rode it out".


It was significantly attenuated where he was.

Max


Yep, but he still brags about sitting at anchor in 45kts of hurricane.


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.



  #82   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That's not the case, from my observations. Given two equally prepped
pieces of wood, the Cetol will outlast varnish by about 10% at most, and
require about 10% less work to maintain.



Maxprop wrote:
The biggest difference between the two that I've found is the technique and
care required during application. I'm good with a brush, but it still takes
me far longer and with far more care to apply a coat of varnish vs. Cetol.


Maybe I'm getting to be a fussy old fogey, but it seems totally natural
to me to be careful like that. Modern varnishes (at least the
high-dollar stuff) is nowhere near as temperamental as the old time spar
varnish I remember.

My wife uses foam brushes... still have to be careful about bubbles, but
it's pretty quick and easy. I'm wavering on the foam brush thing, it
seems sinful to me.

.... And weather is another factor. I've applied
Cetol in 45 degrees and wind, and also in 90 degrees and humidity, both with
acceptable results. Varnish requires a narrower set of parameters if the
finish coat is to have a smooth, glasslike appearance.


That's very true. Especially dust & humidity.

... Then of course there
is the issue of sanding between coats. Cetol requires none as it bonds
chemically to itself, but varnish requires a mechanical bond between coats,
so sanding is obligatory.


Actually (depending on the varnish you use) it's not. All sanding does
is produce a lot of dust and require cleanup. The pro we had going over
our brightwork originally gave us a lot of pointers on this. He said
that most people sand way too much and don't clean up after well enough.
Bristol and Epifanes both make a good high-build high-UV-resistant
finish that isn't supposed to be sanded between coats, once the surface
is good.





The new clear stuff doesn't look as bad as the old orange Jell-O Cetol,
but it still doesn't look good up close.



I honestly can't tell much difference between the two.


Maybe you haven't looked well enough. Up close, the difference is
obvious. From ten feet away, it's not obvious but visible.

If a boat with really sharp varnished brightwork parked next to you,
people would say "Boy that Sea Sprite sure is a pretty boat, what a dang
shame about the woodwork."


If the wood has pretty enough grain to be worth any type of bright finish,
it deserves varnish IMHO.



Have you ever tried Epifanes Gloss Wood Finish?


Yep. I'm not positive but IIRC that's what's on the tugboat right now.


BTW we had a professional do some of the wood on our boat when we first
bought it, the former owner had slapped on a terrible coating of
polyurethane. He also takes care of a number of boats with Cetol and he
swears the stuff is actually more work than varnish.



I've heard that before, and don't believe it for a moment.


Well, this guy makes a pretty good living at it and knows a lot more
than I do... I can't believe somebody would pay money for a pro job and
want Cetol but apparently a lot do (including two in our marina).


... Perhaps when we retire to Oriental, we'll reconsider varnish for
the brightwork.


That part of NC (around New Bern as well) is getting to be worse than
Florida. They're four-laning the highway to Oriental, so that the
blue-hairs will have an easier time. But hey, there's plenty of room for
more!



We noted the road work when we were there last year. Not too many bluehairs
when we were there, but no doubt they'll come. They always do.


They're already there. That daily 3 truckloads of New York newspapers
and 2 truckloads of froo-froo coffee isn't for consumption by locals.


Fresh Breezes- Doug King

  #83   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Maxprop wrote:
Another exception is the Graham & Schlageter-designed S2 35 CC. It was a
lower-volume center cockpit boat built on a racing hull, and it was
amazingly fast, especially downwind, but it wasn't beautiful. Nothing on
our part of Lake Michigan, short of a maxi, could outrun that beast.


I've heard of them, neer seen one in person. There were two S-2 9.2cc in
our marina, one owned by some good friends... both sailed pretty
respectably even if they weren't center cockpit boats. I like S-2 boats.

DSK

  #84   Report Post  
Thom Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Scot,

Temp got up to 62' yesterday, on the boat. Dog and I got in a evening
sail. Did come home in the dark and on the motor but first evening sail
of '05.

Temp in the back yard 40 deg at 6:15 AM very foggy. Have a lunch
appointment so it really doesn't matter.

Maybe another short sail this evening without dog. I'm sure she won't
mind :^)

Ole Thom




http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsPage

  #85   Report Post  
Thom Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Katy & Joe;

It was in a Storm such as is blewing in Oz's land, that all but ruined
"Bull" Halsey reputation when he took the fleet to sea off Japan. They
took a hell of a pounding.

Ole Thom



  #86   Report Post  
Scott Vernon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Consider yourself fortunate, and appreciate it.

SV


"Thom Stewart" wrote in message
...
Scot,

Temp got up to 62' yesterday, on the boat. Dog and I got in a

evening
sail. Did come home in the dark and on the motor but first evening

sail
of '05.

Temp in the back yard 40 deg at 6:15 AM very foggy. Have a lunch
appointment so it really doesn't matter.

Maybe another short sail this evening without dog. I'm sure she

won't
mind :^)

Ole Thom




http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsPage



  #87   Report Post  
katysails
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yeah...ditto...we're 20 degrees lower than the average for the whole month
and it's snowing and icing again...I guess the ski resorts will be happy
with all the spring skiing but it sure is playing havoc with the rest of us
who want to get on with it....dang Canadian clippers...

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
Consider yourself fortunate, and appreciate it.

SV


"Thom Stewart" wrote in message
...
Scot,

Temp got up to 62' yesterday, on the boat. Dog and I got in a

evening
sail. Did come home in the dark and on the motor but first evening

sail
of '05.

Temp in the back yard 40 deg at 6:15 AM very foggy. Have a lunch
appointment so it really doesn't matter.

Maybe another short sail this evening without dog. I'm sure she

won't
mind :^)

Ole Thom




http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsPage





  #88   Report Post  
katysails
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Guess they should have been sailing Crapanado 27's...

"Thom Stewart" wrote in message
...
Katy & Joe;

It was in a Storm such as is blewing in Oz's land, that all but ruined
"Bull" Halsey reputation when he took the fleet to sea off Japan. They
took a hell of a pounding.

Ole Thom



  #89   Report Post  
Maxprop
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"DSK" wrote in message

Maxprop wrote:
Another exception is the Graham & Schlageter-designed S2 35 CC. It was a
lower-volume center cockpit boat built on a racing hull, and it was
amazingly fast, especially downwind, but it wasn't beautiful. Nothing on
our part of Lake Michigan, short of a maxi, could outrun that beast.


I've heard of them, neer seen one in person. There were two S-2 9.2cc in
our marina, one owned by some good friends... both sailed pretty
respectably even if they weren't center cockpit boats. I like S-2 boats.


S2s were built up here in Holland, Michigan. The owner of the company was a
gent named Leon Slikkers, a displaced Dutchman, who started out building
Slikcraft powerboats, then sold his company to AMF, and was barred from
building powerboats for a period of ten years by the sale contract. So he
built sailboats, and some of the early S2s were among the ugliest, worst
performing pieces of high quality junk ever produced. He was a quick study,
however, and hired Graham and Schlageter to design his line of
cruiser/racers, and Arthur Edmonds (I think) to design the cruisers. The
results were exceptionally well-built boats with lots of upgrade features.
And they were good sailing machines. The G&S designed 35' CC was one of his
last sailing designs, and it was too bad it wasn't expanded upon into larger
boats. They were deceptively fast and beautifully constructed, if not
particularly beautiful aesthetically. Slikkers is back building powerboats
(Tiara), but he claims he'll build a fleet of 6 or 7 7.9 Grand Slam racers
if someone will give him an order and 50% down. Yeah, sure.

Max


  #90   Report Post  
katysails
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Too bad they're making Tiara's now...what a comedown....but Max is right
about that S-2...that thing was FAST....smokin fast....BTW, Max, who ended
up buying her and where did she go?


"Maxprop" wrote in message
. net...

"DSK" wrote in message

Maxprop wrote:
Another exception is the Graham & Schlageter-designed S2 35 CC. It was
a lower-volume center cockpit boat built on a racing hull, and it was
amazingly fast, especially downwind, but it wasn't beautiful. Nothing
on our part of Lake Michigan, short of a maxi, could outrun that beast.


I've heard of them, neer seen one in person. There were two S-2 9.2cc in
our marina, one owned by some good friends... both sailed pretty
respectably even if they weren't center cockpit boats. I like S-2 boats.


S2s were built up here in Holland, Michigan. The owner of the company was
a gent named Leon Slikkers, a displaced Dutchman, who started out building
Slikcraft powerboats, then sold his company to AMF, and was barred from
building powerboats for a period of ten years by the sale contract. So he
built sailboats, and some of the early S2s were among the ugliest, worst
performing pieces of high quality junk ever produced. He was a quick
study, however, and hired Graham and Schlageter to design his line of
cruiser/racers, and Arthur Edmonds (I think) to design the cruisers. The
results were exceptionally well-built boats with lots of upgrade features.
And they were good sailing machines. The G&S designed 35' CC was one of
his last sailing designs, and it was too bad it wasn't expanded upon into
larger boats. They were deceptively fast and beautifully constructed, if
not particularly beautiful aesthetically. Slikkers is back building
powerboats (Tiara), but he claims he'll build a fleet of 6 or 7 7.9 Grand
Slam racers if someone will give him an order and 50% down. Yeah, sure.

Max



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are polls taking a toll? NOYB General 43 May 19th 04 03:03 PM
Bush Blunders Taking a Toll John Gaquin General 39 May 10th 04 06:15 AM
Some chilling thoughts on winter boating. Mad Dog Dave General 0 January 15th 04 11:28 PM
FS: Kover Klamp Winter Framing Kit in MA [email protected] Marketplace 0 November 27th 03 05:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017