LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
katysails
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nah...actually, his boat is one of the prettiest I've seen (don't tell him
that, though...things like that go to his head and then he becomes
unbearable...)

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
katysails wrote:
We tarp and humidity gets under there...


Humidity is bad, especially going through thaw/freeze cycles, but unless
there are already bubbles in the varnish, or moisture sealed in, I don't
understand how this is going to tear up the finish. I have some experience
with boats left outside through New England winters, and they usually
required touching up... sometimes major touching up... but varnish up
there lasts a lot longer than down here in my admittedly limited
experience.


... what we have found is that there is a direct relationship to the
proximity of the wood pulp factory to where our boat is moored and
stored...Muskegon is an industrial town and I think air pollution might
explain some of it...our varnish jobs lasted better when we were up
farther north away from industry....


I can see that. Fly ash will put acid spots on every surface... it's bad
for cars too.


and yes, Max's boat is worth the effort of varnish, but hey, he likes
cetol, so who am I to complain?


Hold your eyes painfully when you walk by his boat

Fresh Breezes- Doug King



  #2   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

katysails wrote:
Nah...actually, his boat is one of the prettiest I've seen (don't tell him
that, though...things like that go to his head and then he becomes
unbearable...)


Owning a pretty boat is an obligation to the public.

DSK

  #3   Report Post  
Capt. Neal®
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"DSK" spewed the following crap:

Owning a pretty boat is an obligation to the public.

DSK



Typical liberal - all show and no go. Function means less than appearances,
lies speak louder than the truth, fantasy is fact!

CN
  #4   Report Post  
Maxprop
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message


"DSK" spewed the following crap:

Owning a pretty boat is an obligation to the public.



Typical liberal - all show and no go. Function means less than
appearances,
lies speak louder than the truth, fantasy is fact!


What has obviously escaped your notice over the years is the fact that quite
often boats of beauty are great performers as well. Conversely ugly
boats--those that have been optimized for interior volume rather than hull
design integrity--are most often terrible performers. Take the Morgan Out
Island series, as an example of the latter. And the CCA yachts of the 40s
and 50s as an example of the former. The Hinckley Bermuda 40 is still one
of the finest performing, best handling boats in existence. It still wins
handicap races, and it's drop dead gorgeous. So are the 6 Metres and
Etchells 22s. Even the latest America's Cup yachts are beautiful in design
and appearance. Dame Ellen MacArthur's B&Q, while quite modern in design,
is quite attractive.

This is not a political issue, rather one of aesthetics vs. performance,
which are not mutually exclusive by any stretch of the imagination.

Max


  #5   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Maxprop wrote:
.... quite
often boats of beauty are great performers as well. Conversely ugly
boats--those that have been optimized for interior volume rather than hull
design integrity--are most often terrible performers. Take the Morgan Out
Island series, as an example of the latter.


Or most (not all) center cockpit boats.

... And the CCA yachts of the 40s
and 50s as an example of the former. The Hinckley Bermuda 40 is still one
of the finest performing, best handling boats in existence. It still wins
handicap races, and it's drop dead gorgeous. So are the 6 Metres and
Etchells 22s. Even the latest America's Cup yachts are beautiful in design
and appearance. Dame Ellen MacArthur's B&Q, while quite modern in design,
is quite attractive.


Any boat that wins is pretty. The more she wins, the prettier she gets!

L.Francis Herreshoff wrote that the sea may be considered to have an eye
for beauty, that hulls which just 'look right,' especially to an
experienced sailor, often are the best.

It's true that computational dynamics have replaced the experienced eye
in naval architecture, and boats have become enormously faster (largely
because of advances in materials IMHO), the experienced sailors eye
still has a feel for what the sea will approve of. Ugly race boats are
usually optimized to some measurement rule rather than for performance.

Fresh Breezes- Doug King



  #6   Report Post  
Joe
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well said Doug, Except for that wise crack about center cockpits.

Joe

  #7   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Joe wrote:
Well said Doug, Except for that wise crack about center cockpits.


It may be that your boat is one of the exceptions... given what you've
said, and the look of it from pictures, I'd be inclined to think so.

However it's one of those design trade-offs... you could take any hull &
rig, and rebuild the deck to a center cockpit configuration, and thus
gain interior accomodation & privacy at the expense of sailing performance.

Please note that very very few racing boats have center cockpits... it
was tried on 12-Meters, for example... IIRC the only real winner of the
bunch was 'Flyer' a custom Swan ketch in the first Whitbread
'Round-The-World' race... it works on very big boats, such as Mari-Cha 4...

DSK

  #8   Report Post  
Maxprop
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"DSK" wrote in message

It's true that computational dynamics have replaced the experienced eye in
naval architecture, and boats have become enormously faster (largely
because of advances in materials IMHO), the experienced sailors eye still
has a feel for what the sea will approve of. Ugly race boats are usually
optimized to some measurement rule rather than for performance.


I can't remember the name of the boat, but it was a noted one-off
rule-beater back in the seventies. It was so butt-f***ing ugly as to be
offensive. Not sure if it won many races, but it did get a lot of press.

Max


  #9   Report Post  
Maxprop
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"DSK" wrote in message

katysails wrote:
Nah...actually, his boat is one of the prettiest I've seen (don't tell
him that, though...things like that go to his head and then he becomes
unbearable...)


Owning a pretty boat is an obligation to the public.


I've never considered it to be an obligation to anyone g, but it is most
enjoyable when people pass by the million dollar Sea Rays and Tiaras on a
dock to compliment my boat.

Max


  #10   Report Post  
Capt. Neal®
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"katysails" wrote complementing "Cut the Mustard" thusly:

Nah...actually, his boat is one of the prettiest I've seen (don't tell him
that, though...things like that go to his head and then he becomes
unbearable...)



Thanks, Katy!

CN


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are polls taking a toll? NOYB General 43 May 19th 04 03:03 PM
Bush Blunders Taking a Toll John Gaquin General 39 May 10th 04 06:15 AM
Some chilling thoughts on winter boating. Mad Dog Dave General 0 January 15th 04 11:28 PM
FS: Kover Klamp Winter Framing Kit in MA [email protected] Marketplace 0 November 27th 03 05:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017