Nice 3D map of valley:

http://pbisotopes.ess.sunysb.edu/reports/dem_2/


"Bart Senior" wrote in message
...
The reason I brought this up is I met a a commerical
fisherman who has found numerous Mamoth tusks and
plotted the projected extent of the prehistoric shoreline
based on these findings.

The most amazing thing is he found an underwater site
rich in artifacts that he believes is a 15,000 year or older
city off the eastern seaboard. He has pulled up what he
believes is a 15,000 year old carved stone cup, and also
some larger pefectly regularly shaped stones that were too
big to bring back.

Unfortunately the scientific community wants him to give
up all his data for nothing, and just hand over 11 years of
artifacts and notes he has collected. None of them will
validate any of his findings. Without a formal education he
has been unable to obtain any grant money for such research.

If true, this would be the first verified underwater site.
Previous locations have been determined to be naturally
formed rock ledges.

Another argument against such findings is the theory that
most if not all his findings were washed out by glaciers.
This does not explain the fact that the "city" site is located
on a sea mount.

I will post some pictures of some of the treasures he has
found.

Bart

Nice site Gilligan.... very interesting.

CM

"Gilligan" wrote in message
ink.net...
Nice 3D map of valley:

http://pbisotopes.ess.sunysb.edu/reports/dem_2/


"Bart Senior" wrote in message
...
The reason I brought this up is I met a a commerical
fisherman who has found numerous Mamoth tusks and
plotted the projected extent of the prehistoric shoreline
based on these findings.

The most amazing thing is he found an underwater site
rich in artifacts that he believes is a 15,000 year or older
city off the eastern seaboard. He has pulled up what he
believes is a 15,000 year old carved stone cup, and also
some larger pefectly regularly shaped stones that were too
big to bring back.

Unfortunately the scientific community wants him to give
up all his data for nothing, and just hand over 11 years of
artifacts and notes he has collected. None of them will
validate any of his findings. Without a formal education he
has been unable to obtain any grant money for such research.

If true, this would be the first verified underwater site.
Previous locations have been determined to be naturally
formed rock ledges.

Another argument against such findings is the theory that
most if not all his findings were washed out by glaciers.
This does not explain the fact that the "city" site is located
on a sea mount.

I will post some pictures of some of the treasures he has
found.

Bart