wrote in message

The problem is that you don't understand the information, which is
right in front of you. You are looking for a concrete ruling, and
there isn't one for exactly the reasons I stated several times in
several ways. You either don't want to understand it, or you are
unable to understand it.

Bubba... you've been vague, evasive and trite in your miserable attempts at
an explanation of the subject matter you profess to be familiar with.....
deciphering the mumbo jumbo you've attempted to pass off as answering a
legitimate question seems to elicit an understanding that you have no idea
of the subject matter. You were asked for an example and have been unable to
provide one.... which of course only underlines your inability to grasp the
topic.

I believe that Dan has been very patient with you and has made every attempt
to guide you into providing an answer to his question. As usual you have
failed miserably.... let's face it Bubba.... outside of providing a target
to vent a spleen on ... you have no nautical value on this newsgroup. Stick
to being a miserable prick... it's what you know best.

CM