"katysails" wrote in message
...
In order for those children to receive the $15, the original donation
would
have to be more like %250 to cover the costs of management fees,
etc....

I think that you have been subjected to propoganda.

There are many disreputable charities who deliver very little of their
income to the needy. However, most mainstream charities are quite
efficient. The St. Vincent de Paul, for example, spends 90% of its income
on the needy.

http://www.cdi.gov.au/submissions/19...centDePaul.doc


There is nothing wrong with taking care of one of God's creatures
that you love, be it pet or another human being. Most people who are
generous and kind to pets are also generous and kind in charitable giving.
People who are mean to animals generally don't give a rat's ass about
people
at all...

That sounds really nice. In fact I'd suggest that it is politically
correct rubbish.

You are mistaken when you say that people who spend money on their pets are
"generous". Most pets are, in fact, a substitute for
family/lovers/slaves. People who own pets are seeking affection or
obedience, and are far more likely to be self centred than non-pet owners.



Regards


Donal
--

"Donal" wrote

You are mistaken when you say that people who spend money on their
pets are
"generous". Most pets are, in fact, a substitute for
family/lovers/slaves.

WTF are you babbling about? I have a family and a wife/lover/slave.
We have a dog too.

People who own pets are seeking affection or
obedience, and are far more likely to be self centred than non-pet
owners.


Bure bull ****, Donut. Pure British Bull ****!

Scotty

"Donal" wrote in message

You are mistaken when you say that people who spend money on their pets
are
"generous". Most pets are, in fact, a substitute for
family/lovers/slaves. People who own pets are seeking affection or
obedience, and are far more likely to be self centred than non-pet owners.

Donal... my chickens won't obey any commands I give them... I think they are
plotting something. The goose just wants a pet and a handout of food....
the Rhodesian Ridge back thinks it owns me.... what am I doing wrong?

PS... I think the canary and the parrot are backing the chook revolt... I'm
thinking of invoking the patriot act .

CM

You need to stay away from the chickens.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:w2KMd.3302$rB6.496@edtnps91...

"Donal" wrote in message

You are mistaken when you say that people who spend money on their pets
are
"generous". Most pets are, in fact, a substitute for
family/lovers/slaves. People who own pets are seeking affection or
obedience, and are far more likely to be self centred than non-pet
owners.

Donal... my chickens won't obey any commands I give them... I think they
are plotting something. The goose just wants a pet and a handout of
food.... the Rhodesian Ridge back thinks it owns me.... what am I doing
wrong?

PS... I think the canary and the parrot are backing the chook revolt...
I'm thinking of invoking the patriot act .

CM

I think they have WMD stored in the Chook Coop.... I'm going to have to
invade!
I'll let them have "elections" and then place my own Rooster in charge
despite the vote results.
Sure there will be bloodshed and lost chickens... but that's the cost of
fresh eggs these days!

CM

"JG" wrote in message
...
You need to stay away from the chickens.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:w2KMd.3302$rB6.496@edtnps91...

"Donal" wrote in message

You are mistaken when you say that people who spend money on their pets
are
"generous". Most pets are, in fact, a substitute for
family/lovers/slaves. People who own pets are seeking affection or
obedience, and are far more likely to be self centred than non-pet
owners.

Donal... my chickens won't obey any commands I give them... I think they
are plotting something. The goose just wants a pet and a handout of
food.... the Rhodesian Ridge back thinks it owns me.... what am I doing
wrong?

PS... I think the canary and the parrot are backing the chook revolt...
I'm thinking of invoking the patriot act .

CM

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message

"Donal" wrote in message

You are mistaken when you say that people who spend money on their pets
are
"generous". Most pets are, in fact, a substitute for
family/lovers/slaves. People who own pets are seeking affection or
obedience, and are far more likely to be self centred than non-pet
owners.

Donal... my chickens won't obey any commands I give them... I think they
are plotting something. The goose just wants a pet and a handout of
food.... the Rhodesian Ridge back thinks it owns me.... what am I doing
wrong?

PS... I think the canary and the parrot are backing the chook revolt...
I'm thinking of invoking the patriot act .

I think, in this case, it would be the Pet-riot Act.

Mac

"Maxprop" wrote in message
.net...

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message

"Donal" wrote in message

You are mistaken when you say that people who spend money on their pets
are
"generous". Most pets are, in fact, a substitute for
family/lovers/slaves. People who own pets are seeking affection or
obedience, and are far more likely to be self centred than non-pet
owners.

Donal... my chickens won't obey any commands I give them... I think they
are plotting something. The goose just wants a pet and a handout of
food.... the Rhodesian Ridge back thinks it owns me.... what am I doing
wrong?

PS... I think the canary and the parrot are backing the chook revolt...
I'm thinking of invoking the patriot act .

I think, in this case, it would be the Pet-riot Act.

Heh.. excellent Idea... do you work for Haliburton by any chance?

CM

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:w2KMd.3302$rB6.496@edtnps91...

"Donal" wrote in message

You are mistaken when you say that people who spend money on their pets
are
"generous". Most pets are, in fact, a substitute for
family/lovers/slaves. People who own pets are seeking affection or
obedience, and are far more likely to be self centred than non-pet
owners.

Donal... my chickens won't obey any commands I give them...

It's probably a "pronounciation" problem. Have you tried giving them
instructions when you're sober?


Regards



Donal
--

"Donal" wrote in message
It's probably a "pronounciation" problem. Have you tried giving them
instructions when you're sober?

Sober???... what a novel idea!!
Oh wait..I enacted the Pet-riot Act and have already added overproof to
their drinking water... crowd control.... I'm thinking maybe declaring a
war on drugs.. but first I have to get them addicted to something... maybe
lace the mash with cocaine? Yeah... then it would be like Bush and the Oil
companies... if they want more mash... they'll have to produce more eggs!

I can declare war on the terrorist raccoons.... they have Paws of Mass
Destruction.... that should be sufficient reason to revoke the coop's open
door policy and lock it down for good. Nobody gets in or out without
permission!

Oh Yeah... I'm lovin' this Bush Doctrine of the Chook Coop strategy....

CM

Donal wrote:
"katysails" wrote in message
...
In order for those children to receive the $15, the
original donation would have to be more like %250 to
cover the costs of management fees,
etc....

I think that you have been subjected to propoganda.

There are many disreputable charities who deliver very
little of their income to the needy. However, most
mainstream charities are quite efficient. The St.
Vincent de Paul, for example, spends 90% of its income on
the needy.

http://www.cdi.gov.au/submissions/19...centDePaul.doc


There is nothing wrong with taking care of one of God's
creatures
that you love, be it pet or another human being. Most
people who are generous and kind to pets are also
generous and kind in charitable giving. People who are
mean to animals generally don't give a rat's ass about
people at all...

That sounds really nice. In fact I'd suggest that it is
politically correct rubbish.

You are mistaken when you say that people who spend money
on their pets are "generous". Most pets are, in fact, a
substitute for family/lovers/slaves. People who own
pets are seeking affection or obedience, and are far more
likely to be self centred than non-pet owners.

Sell your freaking boat and feed the whole continent

Regards


Donal
--