Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
1. It's going to burn out some day.
2. Expand until it all energy is used then it will collapse upon itself. 3. I have learned I like star gazing. And I think Ive found an astroid in an ellipital orbit that will strike England around 3 PM April the 10th 2063. It's only approx 1.8 mi in diameter. What have you learned? Do you astroproject your physic skills around the universe? Joe |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It was not the supernova that produced the heavy elements. The supernova scattered the elements produced in the red giant star as
the star collapsed in on itself and exploded. Our sun is producing heavy elements in its core as we speak. Being a second generation star, however, the process may not have advanced to very far at this stage. I hope this helps. CN "Donal" wrote in message ... "Joe" wrote in message oups.com... Very good answer Donal, but other are out to find out the truth. Sagan said "we are all made of star stuff". What he meant by that was that the chemical elements of which we and everything on Earth are made, originated in the huge explosions which take place at the end of a star's life. This explosion is called a supernova, and if it were not for these explosions, none of the chemical elements heavier than Helium would exist. There would be, for example, no oxygen or iron, two elements which are essential to life on earth as we know it... and steel sailboats. Don't you find it strange that a little supernova is able to produce all these elements? After all, the great big grandaddy of all explosions, the Big Bang, managed to produce only two elements!!!! I use my telescope to : 1) to learn how our Sun will evolve as it grows older Bull****! What's gonna happen to our Sun? 2) to learn how our galaxy will evolve How will it evolve? 3) to learn how the universe will evolve It'll get bigger, huh? Perhaps you would tell us about your observations and the conclusions that you have drawn. Really Joe, I think that you overestimate your ability to interpret what your instruments tell you. I bet that you have learned nothing at all about the universe from your telescope. You could easily prove me wrong by posting something that we haven't already read on the Intrernet - but I bet that you can't! Regards Donal -- |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe" wrote in message oups.com... 1. It's going to burn out some day. 2. Expand until it all energy is used then it will collapse upon itself. 3. I have learned I like star gazing. I like star gazing too. Let's see now, I like to gaze at Nichole Kidman, Elizabeth Hurley, Cate Blanchette, Sissy Spacek, Sigourney Weaver, Elisha Cuthbert, Shania Twain, Cher, Paris Hilton, etc. CN |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:27:24 -0000, "Donal"
wrote this crap: Don't you find it strange that a little supernova is able to produce all these elements? After all, the great big grandaddy of all explosions, the Big Bang, managed to produce only two elements!!!! Shh! Yer making sense. Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
He makes no sense at all because he's not stating the facts.
The facts are NOBODY knows what happened during the Big Bang. It's all still theory at this point. As a matter of fact, Stephen Hawking is now postulating that the universe is closed and infinite at the same time. (Try to wrap your inferior cranial contents around that one.) The so-called Big Bang may only be a part of the space time continuum and not a beginning as is commonly believed by laymen and scientists alike. CN "Horvath" wrote in message ... On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:27:24 -0000, "Donal" wrote this crap: Don't you find it strange that a little supernova is able to produce all these elements? After all, the great big grandaddy of all explosions, the Big Bang, managed to produce only two elements!!!! Shh! Yer making sense. Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Capt. Neal®" wrote
I like star gazing too. Let's see now, I like to gaze at Nichole Kidman, Elizabeth Hurley, Cate Blanchette, Sissy Spacek, Sigourney Weaver, Elisha Cuthbert, Shania Twain, Cher, Paris Hilton, etc. You were doing fine til you mentioned that skank, Paris Hilton. Scout |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Capt. Neal®" wrote
The facts are NOBODY knows what happened during the Big Bang. It's all still theory at this point. According to Carnak, we only know what happened immediately after the Big Bang ~ the Big Cigarette. Scout |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You have to go along with String Theory to agree with hawkings...it's rather
mind-boggling... "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... He makes no sense at all because he's not stating the facts. The facts are NOBODY knows what happened during the Big Bang. It's all still theory at this point. As a matter of fact, Stephen Hawking is now postulating that the universe is closed and infinite at the same time. (Try to wrap your inferior cranial contents around that one.) The so-called Big Bang may only be a part of the space time continuum and not a beginning as is commonly believed by laymen and scientists alike. CN "Horvath" wrote in message ... On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:27:24 -0000, "Donal" wrote this crap: Don't you find it strange that a little supernova is able to produce all these elements? After all, the great big grandaddy of all explosions, the Big Bang, managed to produce only two elements!!!! Shh! Yer making sense. Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The facts are NOBODY knows what happened during the
Big Bang. It's all still theory at this point. It's pretty funny to read mental midget Neal's comments on such things. He probably has the whole Cosmos collection on DVD and thinks he has a clue! Anyone want to meet me at Milliway's for dinner? I'll bring Trillian. RB |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Katy, I'm surprised you even know about Hawking and
string theory. You continue to impress. And, I thought you were just some wannabe pseudo intellectual . . . CN "katysails" wrote in message ... You have to go along with String Theory to agree with hawkings...it's rather mind-boggling... "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... He makes no sense at all because he's not stating the facts. The facts are NOBODY knows what happened during the Big Bang. It's all still theory at this point. As a matter of fact, Stephen Hawking is now postulating that the universe is closed and infinite at the same time. (Try to wrap your inferior cranial contents around that one.) The so-called Big Bang may only be a part of the space time continuum and not a beginning as is commonly believed by laymen and scientists alike. CN "Horvath" wrote in message ... On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:27:24 -0000, "Donal" wrote this crap: Don't you find it strange that a little supernova is able to produce all these elements? After all, the great big grandaddy of all explosions, the Big Bang, managed to produce only two elements!!!! Shh! Yer making sense. Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS:Marine Business & Towing Service in Florida | Marketplace | |||
OT Bush hatred | General | |||
Small business in the US......... | General | |||
Bombardier sells rec vehicle business | General |