|
The Perfect Baby
Okay...he's not perfect! But he is pretty adorable.
Shot with the new camera (Nikon D70 with 50mm 1.8 lens). http://members.aol.com/bobsprit/images/50tom2.jpg Capt RB |
Is that runt Baptized yet?
Better do it soon. He is not old enough to accept Jesus on his own free will. Get him some protection now before it is too late. Bob Crantz "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Okay...he's not perfect! But he is pretty adorable. Shot with the new camera (Nikon D70 with 50mm 1.8 lens). http://members.aol.com/bobsprit/images/50tom2.jpg Capt RB |
Nice shot Bob..... and look no red eye!
It must be the Nikon Eh? :-) CM "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Okay...he's not perfect! But he is pretty adorable. Shot with the new camera (Nikon D70 with 50mm 1.8 lens). http://members.aol.com/bobsprit/images/50tom2.jpg Capt RB |
Oz,
According to the "So called Christians" he'll not be able to enter Heaven if not Baptized. Makes you think doesn't it? He wouldn't be in the company of Cheney, Rumfield, etc. Ole Thom |
Nice shot Bob..... and look no red eye!
It must be the Nikon Eh? :-) Are you SURE there's no redeye? Look at again. RB |
When are you going to tell him that red eye is a property of the human
eye -it's the reflection of light from the retina. It _always_ happens with a subject looking at the camera and a built in (on axis) flash. Closing the subject's pupil with a preflash helps but does not prevent it. Cheers Bobsprit wrote: Nice shot Bob..... and look no red eye! It must be the Nikon Eh? :-) Are you SURE there's no redeye? Look at again. RB |
Bwahahahahaha.... Nav giving me lessons on photography!!????
You sound just like Bob..... Way to Go! CM "Nav" wrote in message ... When are you going to tell him that red eye is a property of the human eye -it's the reflection of light from the retina. It _always_ happens with a subject looking at the camera and a built in (on axis) flash. Closing the subject's pupil with a preflash helps but does not prevent it. Cheers Bobsprit wrote: Nice shot Bob..... and look no red eye! It must be the Nikon Eh? :-) Are you SURE there's no redeye? Look at again. RB |
Nice shot Bob. Did you bounce the flash off the ceiling?
Scout "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Okay...he's not perfect! But he is pretty adorable. Shot with the new camera (Nikon D70 with 50mm 1.8 lens). http://members.aol.com/bobsprit/images/50tom2.jpg Capt RB |
You need them!
Cheers Overproof wrote: Bwahahahahaha.... Nav giving me lessons on photography!!???? You sound just like Bob..... Way to Go! CM "Nav" wrote in message ... When are you going to tell him that red eye is a property of the human eye -it's the reflection of light from the retina. It _always_ happens with a subject looking at the camera and a built in (on axis) flash. Closing the subject's pupil with a preflash helps but does not prevent it. Cheers Bobsprit wrote: Nice shot Bob..... and look no red eye! It must be the Nikon Eh? :-) Are you SURE there's no redeye? Look at again. RB |
Yet here you are regaling us with a basic primer in photography as if you
knew what you were talking about... and that it mattered. Scurry off now... come back and talk to me when you've accumulated some experience and equipment. CM "Nav" wrote in message ... You need them! Cheers Overproof wrote: Bwahahahahaha.... Nav giving me lessons on photography!!???? You sound just like Bob..... Way to Go! CM "Nav" wrote in message ... When are you going to tell him that red eye is a property of the human eye -it's the reflection of light from the retina. It _always_ happens with a subject looking at the camera and a built in (on axis) flash. Closing the subject's pupil with a preflash helps but does not prevent it. Cheers Bobsprit wrote: Nice shot Bob..... and look no red eye! It must be the Nikon Eh? :-) Are you SURE there's no redeye? Look at again. RB |
I bet I've got a longer lens than you!
Bwhahhahahaha Cheers Overproof wrote: Yet here you are regaling us with a basic primer in photography as if you knew what you were talking about... and that it mattered. Scurry off now... come back and talk to me when you've accumulated some experience and equipment. CM "Nav" wrote in message ... You need them! Cheers Overproof wrote: Bwahahahahaha.... Nav giving me lessons on photography!!???? You sound just like Bob..... Way to Go! CM "Nav" wrote in message ... When are you going to tell him that red eye is a property of the human eye -it's the reflection of light from the retina. It _always_ happens with a subject looking at the camera and a built in (on axis) flash. Closing the subject's pupil with a preflash helps but does not prevent it. Cheers Bobsprit wrote: Nice shot Bob..... and look no red eye! It must be the Nikon Eh? :-) Are you SURE there's no redeye? Look at again. RB |
No you don't.....
500-2000mm Telephoto, F5.6. Fitted to my Nikon F4.... Then again I also have a 500mm Cat Lens and a really excellent 17mm. CM "Nav" wrote in message ... I bet I've got a longer lens than you! Bwhahhahahaha Cheers Overproof wrote: Yet here you are regaling us with a basic primer in photography as if you knew what you were talking about... and that it mattered. Scurry off now... come back and talk to me when you've accumulated some experience and equipment. CM "Nav" wrote in message ... You need them! Cheers Overproof wrote: Bwahahahahaha.... Nav giving me lessons on photography!!???? You sound just like Bob..... Way to Go! CM "Nav" wrote in message ... When are you going to tell him that red eye is a property of the human eye -it's the reflection of light from the retina. It _always_ happens with a subject looking at the camera and a built in (on axis) flash. Closing the subject's pupil with a preflash helps but does not prevent it. Cheers Bobsprit wrote: Nice shot Bob..... and look no red eye! It must be the Nikon Eh? :-) Are you SURE there's no redeye? Look at again. RB |
Mine's a LOT longer.
Bwhahhahaha Cheers Overproof wrote: No you don't..... 500-2000mm Telephoto, F5.6. Fitted to my Nikon F4.... Then again I also have a 500mm Cat Lens and a really excellent 17mm. CM "Nav" wrote in message ... I bet I've got a longer lens than you! Bwhahhahahaha Cheers Overproof wrote: Yet here you are regaling us with a basic primer in photography as if you knew what you were talking about... and that it mattered. Scurry off now... come back and talk to me when you've accumulated some experience and equipment. CM "Nav" wrote in message ... You need them! Cheers Overproof wrote: Bwahahahahaha.... Nav giving me lessons on photography!!???? You sound just like Bob..... Way to Go! CM "Nav" wrote in message ... When are you going to tell him that red eye is a property of the human eye -it's the reflection of light from the retina. It _always_ happens with a subject looking at the camera and a built in (on axis) flash. Closing the subject's pupil with a preflash helps but does not prevent it. Cheers Bobsprit wrote: Nice shot Bob..... and look no red eye! It must be the Nikon Eh? :-) Are you SURE there's no redeye? Look at again. RB |
"Nav" wrote in message ... Mine's a LOT longer. Bwhahhahaha Cheers It's not "yours".... CM |
Oh yes it is!
Bwhahahhahaha Cheers Overproof wrote: "Nav" wrote in message ... Mine's a LOT longer. Bwhahhahaha Cheers It's not "yours".... CM |
Hey, care to revise that claim about F5.6 at 2000 mm?
Bwhahhahahaha Cheers Overproof wrote: No you don't..... 500-2000mm Telephoto, F5.6. Fitted to my Nikon F4.... Then again I also have a 500mm Cat Lens and a really excellent 17mm. CM "Nav" wrote in message ... I bet I've got a longer lens than you! Bwhahhahahaha Cheers Overproof wrote: Yet here you are regaling us with a basic primer in photography as if you knew what you were talking about... and that it mattered. Scurry off now... come back and talk to me when you've accumulated some experience and equipment. CM "Nav" wrote in message ... You need them! Cheers Overproof wrote: Bwahahahahaha.... Nav giving me lessons on photography!!???? You sound just like Bob..... Way to Go! CM "Nav" wrote in message ... When are you going to tell him that red eye is a property of the human eye -it's the reflection of light from the retina. It _always_ happens with a subject looking at the camera and a built in (on axis) flash. Closing the subject's pupil with a preflash helps but does not prevent it. Cheers Bobsprit wrote: Nice shot Bob..... and look no red eye! It must be the Nikon Eh? :-) Are you SURE there's no redeye? Look at again. RB |
Show and tell time Navvie..... put up or shut up!
CM "Nav" wrote in message ... Oh yes it is! Bwhahahhahaha Cheers Overproof wrote: "Nav" wrote in message ... Mine's a LOT longer. Bwhahhahaha Cheers It's not "yours".... CM |
Nope.... the lens is F5.6.... F11 with the doubler attached.
CM "Nav" wrote in message ... Hey, care to revise that claim about F5.6 at 2000 mm? Bwhahhahahaha Cheers Overproof wrote: No you don't..... 500-2000mm Telephoto, F5.6. Fitted to my Nikon F4.... Then again I also have a 500mm Cat Lens and a really excellent 17mm. CM "Nav" wrote in message ... I bet I've got a longer lens than you! Bwhahhahahaha Cheers Overproof wrote: Yet here you are regaling us with a basic primer in photography as if you knew what you were talking about... and that it mattered. Scurry off now... come back and talk to me when you've accumulated some experience and equipment. CM "Nav" wrote in message ... You need them! Cheers Overproof wrote: Bwahahahahaha.... Nav giving me lessons on photography!!???? You sound just like Bob..... Way to Go! CM "Nav" wrote in message ... When are you going to tell him that red eye is a property of the human eye -it's the reflection of light from the retina. It _always_ happens with a subject looking at the camera and a built in (on axis) flash. Closing the subject's pupil with a preflash helps but does not prevent it. Cheers Bobsprit wrote: Nice shot Bob..... and look no red eye! It must be the Nikon Eh? :-) Are you SURE there's no redeye? Look at again. RB |
YOU'RE BUSTED!
Cheers Overproof wrote: Show and tell time Navvie..... put up or shut up! CM "Nav" wrote in message ... Oh yes it is! Bwhahahhahaha Cheers Overproof wrote: "Nav" wrote in message ... Mine's a LOT longer. Bwhahhahaha Cheers It's not "yours".... CM |
So, it's not a 2000mm f5.6 telephoto is it?
Hahahhahahahah Want to have another look at what f number it is at 1000mm? RB got you nailed to rights. You really know nothing about photography! Cheers Overproof wrote: Nope.... the lens is F5.6.... F11 with the doubler attached. CM "Nav" wrote in message ... Hey, care to revise that claim about F5.6 at 2000 mm? Bwhahhahahaha Cheers Overproof wrote: No you don't..... 500-2000mm Telephoto, F5.6. Fitted to my Nikon F4.... Then again I also have a 500mm Cat Lens and a really excellent 17mm. CM "Nav" wrote in message ... I bet I've got a longer lens than you! Bwhahhahahaha Cheers Overproof wrote: Yet here you are regaling us with a basic primer in photography as if you knew what you were talking about... and that it mattered. Scurry off now... come back and talk to me when you've accumulated some experience and equipment. CM "Nav" wrote in message ... You need them! Cheers Overproof wrote: Bwahahahahaha.... Nav giving me lessons on photography!!???? You sound just like Bob..... Way to Go! CM "Nav" wrote in message ... When are you going to tell him that red eye is a property of the human eye -it's the reflection of light from the retina. It _always_ happens with a subject looking at the camera and a built in (on axis) flash. Closing the subject's pupil with a preflash helps but does not prevent it. Cheers Bobsprit wrote: Nice shot Bob..... and look no red eye! It must be the Nikon Eh? :-) Are you SURE there's no redeye? Look at again. RB |
No... what I am..... is waiting for you to put up or shut up.
CM "Nav" wrote in message ... YOU'RE BUSTED! Cheers Overproof wrote: Show and tell time Navvie..... put up or shut up! CM "Nav" wrote in message ... Oh yes it is! Bwhahahhahaha Cheers Overproof wrote: "Nav" wrote in message ... Mine's a LOT longer. Bwhahhahaha Cheers It's not "yours".... CM |
I'd say that since you have now admitted you don't have a 2000mm f5.6
there is nothing for me to put up at all. What are you thinking of? Cheers Overproof wrote: No... what I am..... is waiting for you to put up or shut up. CM "Nav" wrote in message ... YOU'RE BUSTED! Cheers Overproof wrote: Show and tell time Navvie..... put up or shut up! CM "Nav" wrote in message ... Oh yes it is! Bwhahahhahaha Cheers Overproof wrote: "Nav" wrote in message ... Mine's a LOT longer. Bwhahhahaha Cheers It's not "yours".... CM |
Overproof wrote: Best you re-read what I wrote ... then see how easily you leap at shadows without comprehending what you are jumping at. You are leaping to false assumptions .... as usual Nav. Here... just to help you out.... 500-2000mm Telephoto, F5.6 And it isn't is it? Bwhhahahahhaha Gawd but you are the architect of your own idiocy at times Nav... WOW! This from a man who doesn't actally know what lens he's got. How DID I know that? Cheers |
I haven't said any such thing... you'd better check the medications you are
on. Put Up or Shut Up Nav... what's it gonna be? CM "Nav" wrote in message ... I'd say that since you have now admitted you don't have a 2000mm f5.6 there is nothing for me to put up at all. What are you thinking of? Cheers Overproof wrote: No... what I am..... is waiting for you to put up or shut up. CM "Nav" wrote in message ... YOU'RE BUSTED! Cheers Overproof wrote: Show and tell time Navvie..... put up or shut up! CM "Nav" wrote in message ... Oh yes it is! Bwhahahhahaha Cheers Overproof wrote: "Nav" wrote in message ... Mine's a LOT longer. Bwhahhahaha Cheers It's not "yours".... CM |
Overproof wrote: I haven't said any such thing... you'd better check the medications you are on. Ahem. The record shows: " No you don't..... 500-2000mm Telephoto, F5.6. Fitted to my Nikon F4.... Then again I also have a 500mm Cat Lens and a really excellent 17mm. CM "Nav" wrote in message I bet I've got a longer lens than you! Bwhahhahahaha Cheers" Better ease up on the booze your memory is failing. Cheers |
And then you posted:
"Nope.... the lens is F5.6.... F11 with the doubler attached." So it is not 2000 mm is it? When extended to 2000 by an extra lens it's not f5.6 either. Double busted. Cheers Nav wrote: Overproof wrote: I haven't said any such thing... you'd better check the medications you are on. Ahem. The record shows: " No you don't..... 500-2000mm Telephoto, F5.6. Fitted to my Nikon F4.... Then again I also have a 500mm Cat Lens and a really excellent 17mm. CM "Nav" wrote in message I bet I've got a longer lens than you! Bwhahhahahaha Cheers" Better ease up on the booze your memory is failing. Cheers |
"Nav" wrote Then again I also have a 500mm Cat Lens and a really excellent 17mm. I have a 40X cat scope on my 22 rifle. Scotty |
I have a nasty man in mine... ;-)
Cheers Scott Vernon wrote: "Nav" wrote Then again I also have a 500mm Cat Lens and a really excellent 17mm. I have a 40X cat scope on my 22 rifle. Scotty |
Nice shot Bob. Did you bounce the flash off the ceiling?
Scout Thanks....Nikon D70 with wireless SB600 flash, 50mm 1.8 prime lens. Flash is up high on a shelf. RB |
Nav ole Boy... that doesn't mean it's not an F5.6 lens does it?
I stated it's an F11 with the doubler didn't I? So you are wrong on 2 points aren't you? As usual! CM "Nav" wrote in message ... And then you posted: "Nope.... the lens is F5.6.... F11 with the doubler attached." So it is not 2000 mm is it? When extended to 2000 by an extra lens it's not f5.6 either. Double busted. Cheers Nav wrote: Overproof wrote: I haven't said any such thing... you'd better check the medications you are on. Ahem. The record shows: " No you don't..... 500-2000mm Telephoto, F5.6. Fitted to my Nikon F4.... Then again I also have a 500mm Cat Lens and a really excellent 17mm. CM "Nav" wrote in message I bet I've got a longer lens than you! Bwhahhahahaha Cheers" Better ease up on the booze your memory is failing. Cheers |
"Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... "Nav" wrote Then again I also have a 500mm Cat Lens and a really excellent 17mm. I have a 40X cat scope on my 22 rifle. Gotta love those donut highlights on the Catadioptric lens... CM |
"Nav" wrote in message I have a nasty man in mine... ;-) I ain't touchin' that line..... CM |
"Nav" wrote in message And it isn't is it? Bwhhahahahhaha But it is.... and please quit laughing like a Hyeana on acid... it reads as ridiculous! WOW! This from a man who doesn't actally know what lens he's got. Of course I know what I have Nav... you just can't comprehend the basics of photography. How DID I know that? You didn't....... obviously! CM |
Please Bob.... it's the best 35mm camera ever made.... way better than the
Nikon F5. The body alone is worth more than your midrange telescope! add the data back and all the accoutrements .... which I have..... well, lets just say anything you have sucks by comparison. CM "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Fitted to my Nikon F4.... BWAHAHAHAHA!!! RB |
"Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Nice shot Bob. Did you bounce the flash off the ceiling? Scout Thanks....Nikon D70 with wireless SB600 flash, 50mm 1.8 prime lens. Flash is up high on a shelf. You should have thought that out a bit better Bob.... nontheless... not bad for an amateur with a midrange digital. Not good nor great by any means though.... Glad you finally learned about "red-eye"....... CM |
Please Bob.... it's the best 35mm camera ever made.... way better than the
Nikon F5. The body alone is worth more than your midrange telescope! I owned a few Nikons. Solid cameras that were cheap enough to not worry to much about. But like may serious shooters, I used Lieca bodies and lenses with were a major cut above, from fit an finish to mirror slap, they just outgunned the Nikons and had the best optics around. Nikon F4? Why not tell us you had a Minolta Maxum while you're at it! You can pick up a Nikon F4 body for about 350.00. Low cost body to say the least. Check ebay. RB |
You should have thought that out a bit better Bob.... nontheless... not
bad for an amateur with a midrange digital. Not good nor great by any means though.... Wonder what mooron means by midrange digital. The D70 is not a midrange digital. Not here or anywhere. It's an entry level DSLR. RB |
Glad you finally learned about "red-eye"......
We're still waiting to hear how a camera with built in flash can knock it out all the time. And waiting...and waiting.... RB |
"Bobsprit" wrote in message I owned a few Nikons. Solid cameras that were cheap enough to not worry to much about. But like may serious shooters, I used Lieca bodies and lenses with were a major cut above, from fit an finish to mirror slap, they just outgunned the Nikons and had the best optics around. Nikon F4? Why not tell us you had a Minolta Maxum while you're at it! You can pick up a Nikon F4 body for about 350.00. Low cost body to say the least. Check ebay. That about spells out how little you know about the Nikon F4 body [titanium steel]... never mind the 1/8000 shutterspeeds. Still the best SLR you can buy. The original price tag was $2800 for the body... no lens. I have 10 lenses from 17mm to the Telephoto 500/2000. Low Cost indeed ... from a person claiming to have the best telescope available to the public that costs less than my camera body! Pathetic! CM |
"Bobsprit" wrote in message ... You should have thought that out a bit better Bob.... nontheless... not bad for an amateur with a midrange digital. Not good nor great by any means though.... Wonder what mooron means by midrange digital. The D70 is not a midrange digital. Not here or anywhere. It's an entry level DSLR. At around $600 it's a midrange Digital Single Reflex camera.... it's still a friggin digital Bob! CM |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com