|
"Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Glad you finally learned about "red-eye"...... We're still waiting to hear how a camera with built in flash can knock it out all the time. And waiting...and waiting.... Send the check and I'll save you the time of reading through the Photographic Basics Bob! Here's a hint.... adjust your flash! CM |
That about spells out how little you know about the Nikon F4 body [titanium
steel]... never mind the 1/8000 shutterspeeds. Still the best SLR you can buy. Every putz with a Nikon things he has the "best" camera. The F4 body is worth very little these days. Period. The lenses, if they are clean, still have some value. BUT, sell most of them because new glass is better and the new VR lenses are beyond what the old stuff can do. I'm buying a VR lens in the spring. RB |
Low Cost indeed ... from a person claiming to have the best telescope
available to the public that costs less than my camera body! Here let me help you. Value of the F4 body in VG or E condition, aprox 4-500 dollars. Value of a brand new C11 GPS with coatings 3200.00. Case closed. RB |
At around $600 it's a midrange Digital Single Reflex camera.... it's still
a friggin digital Bob! Mooron's ignorance never ends and his posts about prices are even better! The D70 with 18-70 is 1028.00 (after rebate) at a authorized seller. Please don't embarass yourself by posting links to sites that have lower prices. If you check on them they won't sell you the camera alone. Oldest online scam in the book. Mooron, you're truly a fool. You expose your ignorance with each post. Please, keep going! RB |
"Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Low Cost indeed ... from a person claiming to have the best telescope available to the public that costs less than my camera body! Here let me help you. Value of the F4 body in VG or E condition, aprox 4-500 dollars. Value of a brand new C11 GPS with coatings 3200.00. Case closed. You are comparing new now to used then..... this is hardly an accurate estimate. Your current scope... used... $500... tops [ new is $1700 as I posted a link to] CM |
$1,139 Canadian here on the flyer Bob..... no extras required.
My DC290 was $1500.... 6 years ago when I bought it. It's a mid range camera.... don't make it out to be more than what it is. It's already outdated anyway! CM "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... At around $600 it's a midrange Digital Single Reflex camera.... it's still a friggin digital Bob! Mooron's ignorance never ends and his posts about prices are even better! The D70 with 18-70 is 1028.00 (after rebate) at a authorized seller. Please don't embarass yourself by posting links to sites that have lower prices. If you check on them they won't sell you the camera alone. Oldest online scam in the book. Mooron, you're truly a fool. You expose your ignorance with each post. Please, keep going! RB |
all the time.
And waiting...and waiting.... Send the check and I'll save you the time of reading through the No, no. We ALL want to know what no camera maker has been able to solve with a built in flash! You could make millions! RB |
"Bobsprit" wrote in message No, no. We ALL want to know what no camera maker has been able to solve with a built in flash! You could make millions! Wake up... no professional photographer gets "red-eye"... really! Even Wedding Photographers don't get red eye.... Even Baby Photographers don't get red-eye.... Even Passport Photo Photographers don't get red-eye.... Even school photographers don't get red eye.... Even Driver's License Photographers don't get red eye.... ......those are just the lowest rung of professional photographers Bob! Yet you profess to be a professional and constantly post badly composed and badly exposed photos with red-eye! Why is that Bob??? CM |
You are comparing new now to used then..... this is hardly an accurate
estimate. Your current scope... used... $500... tops [ new is $1700 as I posted a link to] You posted a link to the wrong scope. You can barely buy a used C8 for 500 dollars, so I'd really like to see you get a C11 for that. We could go into business! Bwahahahahaha! RB |
It's a mid range camera.... don't make it out to be more than what it is.
???? I said it was ENTRY level DSLR. YOU'RE the one making it out to be more than it is! Bwahahahahahaha! RB |
It's already outdated anyway!
NIkon's replacement for the D70 is quite a ways off. The replacement for the D100 won't be announced until February. The only camera worth looking at would be the Canon 20D, which I got as a gift and RETURNED. 8 MP was not enough to deal with the awful metering system. The Olympus E-volt looks interesting, but who wants that with limited glass? You really know your topic...NOT!! Bwahahahaha!! Haha! RB |
badly exposed photos with red-eye!
Why is that Bob??? Mooron, I can't play anymore today...I'm off to PA with Suzanne and Thomas to help my dad decorate his home for the holidays. Capt RB |
No Bob... it was indeed the C11 I posted the link to.
CM "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... You are comparing new now to used then..... this is hardly an accurate estimate. Your current scope... used... $500... tops [ new is $1700 as I posted a link to] You posted a link to the wrong scope. You can barely buy a used C8 for 500 dollars, so I'd really like to see you get a C11 for that. We could go into business! Bwahahahahaha! RB |
No Bob... it was indeed the C11 I posted the link to.
There are 6 or 7 versions of the C11. The version you posted was bottom of the line mount. Sorry...you lose again. Why not actually look up the C11 line and see what they cost? http://www.celestron.com/prod_pgs/tel/nx11gps.htm Next, find a real dealer and post a link to a real price. http://www.epinions.com/Celestron_Ne...segrain__Teles cope_11053 Have a nice day! I'm off to the Poconos. RB |
Heh... I'm sure someone here will bother [NOT]... but until you post
something to the effect that I am mistaken about the price of your mid range scope..... $1700 stands as the price Bob.... CM "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... No Bob... it was indeed the C11 I posted the link to. There are 6 or 7 versions of the C11. The version you posted was bottom of the line mount. Sorry...you lose again. Why not actually look up the C11 line and see what they cost? http://www.celestron.com/prod_pgs/tel/nx11gps.htm Next, find a real dealer and post a link to a real price. http://www.epinions.com/Celestron_Ne...segrain__Teles cope_11053 Have a nice day! I'm off to the Poconos. RB |
Heh... I'm sure someone here will bother [NOT]... but until you post
something to the effect that I am mistaken about the price of your mid range scope..... I just posted the price. Nextar GPS C11. You posted a totally different scope. http://www.epinions.com/Celestron_Ne...segrain__Teles cope_11053 You lose again. Enjoy your F4...! Bwahahahaha! RB |
Overproof wrote: "Nav" wrote in message And it isn't is it? Bwhhahahahhaha But it is.... and please quit laughing like a Hyeana on acid... it reads as ridiculous! WOW! This from a man who doesn't actally know what lens he's got. Of course I know what I have Nav... you just can't comprehend the basics of photography. Still claiming your lens is a 2000 mm F5.6??? Bwhahahhahaha Cheers |
He does like to exaggerate.
Cheers Bobsprit wrote: You should have thought that out a bit better Bob.... nontheless... not bad for an amateur with a midrange digital. Not good nor great by any means though.... Wonder what mooron means by midrange digital. The D70 is not a midrange digital. Not here or anywhere. It's an entry level DSLR. RB |
I worried that he would not understand what "on axis" meant when I tried
to explain the basics to him. Waste of time really. Cheers Bobsprit wrote: Wake up... no professional photographer gets "red-eye"... really! Even Wedding Photographers don't get red eye.... They use off camera flash units Mooron. Get it? And they still have the problem on occasion, especially in dark rooms. The camera you questioned had a built in flash. We're all waiting (and so is Nikon, Canon, Olympus, Sony) on how to cure red eye 100% with built in flash.....and waiting....and waiting...and waiting! STOMP!!! Bwahahahahahaha! RB |
"Nav" wrote in message Still claiming your lens is a 2000 mm F5.6??? Bwhahahhahaha It's not a claim... CM |
On axis.... Bwahahahahahahahahahhahaaaa!!!
CM "Nav" wrote in message ... I worried that he would not understand what "on axis" meant when I tried to explain the basics to him. Waste of time really. Cheers Bobsprit wrote: Wake up... no professional photographer gets "red-eye"... really! Even Wedding Photographers don't get red eye.... They use off camera flash units Mooron. Get it? And they still have the problem on occasion, especially in dark rooms. The camera you questioned had a built in flash. We're all waiting (and so is Nikon, Canon, Olympus, Sony) on how to cure red eye 100% with built in flash.....and waiting....and waiting...and waiting! STOMP!!! Bwahahahahahaha! RB |
No need to cry. If you ask nicely we'll explain it to you.
Cheers Overproof wrote: On axis.... Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!! CM "Nav" wrote in message ... I worried that he would not understand what "on axis" meant when I tried to explain the basics to him. Waste of time really. Cheers Bobsprit wrote: Wake up... no professional photographer gets "red-eye"... really! Even Wedding Photographers don't get red eye.... They use off camera flash units Mooron. Get it? And they still have the problem on occasion, especially in dark rooms. The camera you questioned had a built in flash. We're all waiting (and so is Nikon, Canon, Olympus, Sony) on how to cure red eye 100% with built in flash.....and waiting....and waiting...and waiting! STOMP!!! Bwahahahahahaha! RB |
Overproof wrote: "Nav" wrote in message Still claiming your lens is a 2000 mm F5.6??? Bwhahahhahaha It's not a claim... No -it's pure fiction. It's not f5.6 at 1000mm either. Bwhahahhahahhahaha Cheers |
"Nav" wrote in message ... Overproof wrote: "Nav" wrote in message Still claiming your lens is a 2000 mm F5.6??? Bwhahahhahaha It's not a claim... No -it's pure fiction. It's not f5.6 at 1000mm either. Bwhahahhahahhahaha That's not at all what I said..... you'd better read the original post for content this time. CM |
I don't ever get red eye... on any shots.
CM "Nav" wrote in message ... No need to cry. If you ask nicely we'll explain it to you. Cheers Overproof wrote: On axis.... Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!! CM "Nav" wrote in message ... I worried that he would not understand what "on axis" meant when I tried to explain the basics to him. Waste of time really. Cheers Bobsprit wrote: Wake up... no professional photographer gets "red-eye"... really! Even Wedding Photographers don't get red eye.... They use off camera flash units Mooron. Get it? And they still have the problem on occasion, especially in dark rooms. The camera you questioned had a built in flash. We're all waiting (and so is Nikon, Canon, Olympus, Sony) on how to cure red eye 100% with built in flash.....and waiting....and waiting...and waiting! STOMP!!! Bwahahahahahaha! RB |
"Bobsprit" wrote in message ... I don't ever get red eye... on any shots. We're all waiting...no redeye from a camera with built in flash ever....? C'mon, we'll make millions! Sad truth is....Mooron won't ever answer. He can't. He can only pretend to know about something. And that's the sad fact. let's see..... I've been doing photography on a professional basis for over 20 years. I currently own a Nikon F4 , Nikonos, Kodak DC290. I've taken underwater video footage Guess what.... never had a shot with red eye. ....and will you friggin pair of cry babies quit with the whining about "built in" camera flash!! CM |
wrote in message Yeah, Moron is a professional. He has to put a black bar over the eyes of the little kids in the photos so they can't be identified. Hence, no red-eye. Odd.... is kiddie porn always on your mind Bill-Bob? |
"Bobsprit" wrote in message ... ...and will you friggin pair of cry babies quit with the whining about "built in" camera flash!! It's part of what causes red eye. Except for you, who can avoid it with such cameras. What a bunch of crap..... it does not cause red eye.... not knowing how to take a photo causes red eye. CM |
It's part of what causes red eye. Except for you, who can avoid it with
such cameras. What a bunch of crap..... it does not cause red eye.. No??? Damn!!! All those camera makers have it wrong then!!!! Bwahahahahaha! RB |
Odd.... is kiddie porn always on your mind Bill-Bob?
Now THAT'S an odd reply! A bit creepy for sure. RB |
"Bobsprit" wrote in message ... It's part of what causes red eye. Except for you, who can avoid it with such cameras. What a bunch of crap..... it does not cause red eye.. No??? Damn!!! All those camera makers have it wrong then!!!! Bwahahahahaha! Not the camera makers... just the bull**** artists like you who make claims regarding a subject matter you have little familiarity with. CM |
I have 4 shoe boxes full of photos, most taken by me. I can't find
any with red-eye, but then, I'm not a pro. Scotty "Overproof" wrote in message news:7dlvd.69953$6f6.8983@edtnps89... "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... It's part of what causes red eye. Except for you, who can avoid it with such cameras. What a bunch of crap..... it does not cause red eye.. No??? Damn!!! All those camera makers have it wrong then!!!! Bwahahahahaha! Not the camera makers... just the bull**** artists like you who make claims regarding a subject matter you have little familiarity with. CM |
Overproof wrote: "Nav" wrote in message ... Overproof wrote: "Nav" wrote in message Still claiming your lens is a 2000 mm F5.6??? Bwhahahhahaha It's not a claim... No -it's pure fiction. It's not f5.6 at 1000mm either. Bwhahahhahahhahaha That's not at all what I said..... So now you are saying you didn't say f5.6 at all? Cheers |
Then you don't take any face on pictures with a built in flash or are
subjects asleep? Cheers Overproof wrote: I don't ever get red eye... on any shots. CM "Nav" wrote in message ... No need to cry. If you ask nicely we'll explain it to you. Cheers Overproof wrote: On axis.... Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!! CM "Nav" wrote in message ... I worried that he would not understand what "on axis" meant when I tried to explain the basics to him. Waste of time really. Cheers Bobsprit wrote: Wake up... no professional photographer gets "red-eye"... really! Even Wedding Photographers don't get red eye.... They use off camera flash units Mooron. Get it? And they still have the problem on occasion, especially in dark rooms. The camera you questioned had a built in flash. We're all waiting (and so is Nikon, Canon, Olympus, Sony) on how to cure red eye 100% with built in flash.....and waiting....and waiting...and waiting! STOMP!!! Bwahahahahahaha! RB |
Bobsprit wrote: ...and will you friggin pair of cry babies quit with the whining about "built in" camera flash!! It's part of what causes red eye. Except for you, who can avoid it with such cameras. Of course he can, he's a professional! Cheers |
|
"Nav" wrote in message ... Overproof wrote: "Nav" wrote in message ... Overproof wrote: "Nav" wrote in message Still claiming your lens is a 2000 mm F5.6??? Bwhahahhahaha It's not a claim... No -it's pure fiction. It's not f5.6 at 1000mm either. Bwhahahhahahhahaha That's not at all what I said..... So now you are saying you didn't say f5.6 at all? I'm not saying I didn't say that..... CM |
Overproof wrote: "Nav" wrote in message ... Overproof wrote: "Nav" wrote in message ... Overproof wrote: "Nav" wrote in message Still claiming your lens is a 2000 mm F5.6??? Bwhahahhahaha It's not a claim... No -it's pure fiction. It's not f5.6 at 1000mm either. Bwhahahhahahhahaha That's not at all what I said..... So now you are saying you didn't say f5.6 at all? I'm not saying I didn't say that..... So you are saying that you thought it was f5.6 but now acknowlege it is niether 2000mm nor f5.6 at 1000mm? What f number is it at 1000mm? Cheers |
wrote in message Meanwhile it's the ONLY explanation offered by ANYONE to date, to explain how Overproof never has redeye in his photos. He doesn't appear to have any other explanation. If he did, we would have heard it by now. I guess his reply amounts to agreement with my post. Sheesh... were did you learn witty comebacks Billiard... the school yard? "He didn't say so ... that makes me right"... whines Bill "He won't tell us ... so whatever I say is right".. blurted lil'Billy Bob Which of course has no bearing on the fact that people who understand composition and angles in photography... Never get RED EYE! .... built in flash or not!!! Just accept the fact that you don't have a clue as to what causes red eye.... if you did.. it wouldn't happen. That Lil' Billiard Boy is just the facts! Deal with it..... or mail me a certified money order and I'll provide you with a detailed explanation. CM |
"Nav" wrote in message I'm shocked! No Nav... you're just stunned! .... but we all knew that. CM |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com