"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...

"Nav" wrote

Then again I also have a 500mm Cat Lens and a really excellent 17mm.


I have a 40X cat scope on my 22 rifle.

Gotta love those donut highlights on the Catadioptric lens...

CM

"Nav" wrote in message

I have a nasty man in mine... ;-)

I ain't touchin' that line.....

CM

"Nav" wrote in message
And it isn't is it?

Bwhhahahahhaha

But it is.... and please quit laughing like a Hyeana on acid... it reads as
ridiculous!

WOW! This from a man who doesn't actally know what lens he's got.

Of course I know what I have Nav... you just can't comprehend the basics of
photography.

How DID I know that?

You didn't....... obviously!

CM

Please Bob.... it's the best 35mm camera ever made.... way better than the
Nikon F5.
The body alone is worth more than your midrange telescope!
add the data back and all the accoutrements .... which I have..... well,
lets just say anything you have sucks by comparison.

CM

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Fitted to my Nikon F4....


BWAHAHAHAHA!!!

RB

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Nice shot Bob. Did you bounce the flash off the ceiling?
Scout


Thanks....Nikon D70 with wireless SB600 flash, 50mm 1.8 prime lens. Flash
is up
high on a shelf.

You should have thought that out a bit better Bob.... nontheless... not
bad for an amateur with a midrange digital. Not good nor great by any means
though....

Glad you finally learned about "red-eye".......

CM

Please Bob.... it's the best 35mm camera ever made.... way better than the
Nikon F5.
The body alone is worth more than your midrange telescope!


I owned a few Nikons. Solid cameras that were cheap enough to not worry to much
about. But like may serious shooters, I used Lieca bodies and lenses with were
a major cut above, from fit an finish to mirror slap, they just outgunned the
Nikons and had the best optics around.
Nikon F4? Why not tell us you had a Minolta Maxum while you're at it! You can
pick up a Nikon F4 body for about 350.00. Low cost body to say the least. Check
ebay.

RB

You should have thought that out a bit better Bob.... nontheless... not
bad for an amateur with a midrange digital. Not good nor great by any means
though....

Wonder what mooron means by midrange digital. The D70 is not a midrange
digital. Not here or anywhere. It's an entry level DSLR.

RB

Glad you finally learned about "red-eye"......


We're still waiting to hear how a camera with built in flash can knock it out
all the time.
And waiting...and waiting....

RB

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
I owned a few Nikons. Solid cameras that were cheap enough to not worry to
much
about. But like may serious shooters, I used Lieca bodies and lenses with
were
a major cut above, from fit an finish to mirror slap, they just outgunned
the
Nikons and had the best optics around.
Nikon F4? Why not tell us you had a Minolta Maxum while you're at it! You
can
pick up a Nikon F4 body for about 350.00. Low cost body to say the least.
Check
ebay.


That about spells out how little you know about the Nikon F4 body [titanium
steel]... never mind the 1/8000 shutterspeeds. Still the best SLR you can
buy. The original price tag was $2800 for the body... no lens. I have 10
lenses from 17mm to the Telephoto 500/2000.

Low Cost indeed ... from a person claiming to have the best telescope
available to the public that costs less than my camera body!

Pathetic!

CM

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
You should have thought that out a bit better Bob.... nontheless... not
bad for an amateur with a midrange digital. Not good nor great by any
means
though....

Wonder what mooron means by midrange digital. The D70 is not a midrange
digital. Not here or anywhere. It's an entry level DSLR.

At around $600 it's a midrange Digital Single Reflex camera.... it's still
a friggin digital Bob!

CM