Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N1EE wrote:
The larger the vessel the more difficult it is to manuever and stop. I wanted to be clear the issue in this question was with respect to backing down. The thrustors provide good side-to-side control and eliminate that factor from the question. Could it have be written more clearly? The variable pitch allows the throttle to be set and forgotten while pitch controls linear thrust--magnitude and direction. There are no worries about engine stalling while changing gears, or cables jamming or snapping, all of which have happened to me in the past, and each of which could be bad news docking and manuevering a mega yacht. Bart Senior It's not quite that simple. First off, thrusters quickly lose their efficiency, as soon as you start moving ahead/astern. You need to keep your speed (generally) below 4K through the water to maintain good thruster power. Since it's difficult to make a prop that is really efficient, with a simple flat blade, most variable pitch will tend to walk to some degree, at all settings .... good news is it's always the same direction. Also, especially with use, most variable pitch will pick up a tendency to "creep" either ahead or astern when the settings are at zero pitch, so you end up having to "tinker" with the controls. Overall, I have a Love/Hate relationship with variable pitch. In some cases I'm damn glad I had it, while in others, damn glad I didn't. Naturally, if it's the one system you are using, many of the minor drawbacks will become second nature for you to use or avoid. otn |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Seamanship Question #15 Props | ASA | |||
Seamanship Question #12 | ASA | |||
Seamanship Question #1 | ASA | |||
Seamanship Question 2 pts plus bonus question. | ASA |