![]() |
Boater operator certificate
Washington state wants to institute a revamped law to require boating
drivers licenses. To those in states who have such laws, what are the pros and cons of your system and does it prevent accidents etc or is it just another red tape gizmo to collect money for the state? Thanks in advance Gordon |
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:12:02 GMT, "Gordon" wrote:
Washington state wants to institute a revamped law to require boating drivers licenses. To those in states who have such laws, what are the pros and cons of your system and does it prevent accidents etc or is it just another red tape gizmo to collect money for the state? Canada recently brought in a licensing requirement. The red tape and operator cost has been negligible as it is a one time license without a renewal requirement. The big plus is that kids under 16 can no longer legally drive jet skis. However, the rules don't seem to prevent a couple of inexperienced 19 year olds from legally renting one *right now* on some kind of provisional license. I think it's a good thing, if only because it makes it clear one should have some qualification before jumping into a boat and hitting the throttle. The testing is so simple that anybody should be able to get one after reading the Coast Guard Safety Brochure, so it is not much of a hurdle to clear. Quite possibly the bar should be higher. Ryk |
It's just another liberal scheme to collect a tax disguised as
a license. Like when you register a boat. It costs more by the foot yet it costs the same in time and paperwork to register a dinghy that is six feet LOA as it does to register a motor yacht that is two hundred feet LOA. Democrats seem to love any scheme that penalizes those who have money. Liberalism is all about taking money and rights away from those who have it and giving it to those to lazy or inept to earn their own. CN "Gordon" wrote in message ... Washington state wants to institute a revamped law to require boating drivers licenses. To those in states who have such laws, what are the pros and cons of your system and does it prevent accidents etc or is it just another red tape gizmo to collect money for the state? Thanks in advance Gordon |
It's a friggin 20 buck tax grab with a ridiculous exam that proves nothing
regarding operator competency! You now need one despite the fact you might have a Master/Minor Waters certification. It's ridiculous. CM "Ryk" wrote in message ... On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:12:02 GMT, "Gordon" wrote: Washington state wants to institute a revamped law to require boating drivers licenses. To those in states who have such laws, what are the pros and cons of your system and does it prevent accidents etc or is it just another red tape gizmo to collect money for the state? Canada recently brought in a licensing requirement. The red tape and operator cost has been negligible as it is a one time license without a renewal requirement. The big plus is that kids under 16 can no longer legally drive jet skis. However, the rules don't seem to prevent a couple of inexperienced 19 year olds from legally renting one *right now* on some kind of provisional license. I think it's a good thing, if only because it makes it clear one should have some qualification before jumping into a boat and hitting the throttle. The testing is so simple that anybody should be able to get one after reading the Coast Guard Safety Brochure, so it is not much of a hurdle to clear. Quite possibly the bar should be higher. Ryk |
"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... It's a friggin 20 buck tax grab with a ridiculous exam that proves nothing regarding operator competency! You now need one despite the fact you might have a Master/Minor Waters certification. It's ridiculous. CM It might keep those rum guzzlin' characters from terrorizing decent sailing folk in Mahone Bay......then again maybe not! |
Just another tax.
-- Keith __ ....at least I thought I was dancing, 'til somebody stepped on my hand. "Gordon" wrote in message ... Washington state wants to institute a revamped law to require boating drivers licenses. To those in states who have such laws, what are the pros and cons of your system and does it prevent accidents etc or is it just another red tape gizmo to collect money for the state? Thanks in advance Gordon |
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:07:36 -0500, Ryk
wrote: I think it's a good thing, if only because it makes it clear one should have some qualification before jumping into a boat and hitting the throttle. The testing is so simple that anybody should be able to get one after reading the Coast Guard Safety Brochure, so it is not much of a hurdle to clear. Quite possibly the bar should be higher. I am also in Toronto, Canada, and got my certificate in the context of Canadian Power Squadron courses. Not a bad thing, and the red tape is minimal. While you can just "sit the test" without prior instruction, the advent of this licencing requirement is getting more people into Power Squadron courses, which is gradually upping the knowledge level of recreational boaters generally, or so it appears to me. At least it's no longer "zero". R. |
"Don White" wrote in message ... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... It's a friggin 20 buck tax grab with a ridiculous exam that proves nothing regarding operator competency! You now need one despite the fact you might have a Master/Minor Waters certification. It's ridiculous. CM It might keep those rum guzzlin' characters from terrorizing decent sailing folk in Mahone Bay......then again maybe not! They're safe now..... Overproof is laying to her cradle..... in the parking lot of the local bar! :-D CM |
It may be so in your area but I can assure you all CYS courses were booked
solid years ago when I took my courses. I paid out of pocket with no hesitation for these courses. What ****es me off the most is that even though the certification automatically assures me an operator's card... I still have to pay the additional $20. This card is no more than a tax grab. I know lots of people who have folks write the test for them online and then pay their fee only to have no clue about boating safety. The card is a scam.... it won't hold up in court. CM "rhys" wrote in message I am also in Toronto, Canada, and got my certificate in the context of Canadian Power Squadron courses. Not a bad thing, and the red tape is minimal. While you can just "sit the test" without prior instruction, the advent of this licencing requirement is getting more people into Power Squadron courses, which is gradually upping the knowledge level of recreational boaters generally, or so it appears to me. At least it's no longer "zero". R. |
I know... it's an idiotic test and you don't have to pass it to get your
card.. just re-write it ... all they want is your $20. "Dave" wrote in message ... On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:12:02 GMT, "Gordon" said: To those in states who have such laws, what are the pros and cons of your system and does it prevent accidents etc or is it just another red tape gizmo to collect money for the state? I wouldn't put much confidence in an operator whose knowledge is limited to what he learned in the course. Would you believe they don't even touch on how to use a compass or a chart? (Well, maybe a bit. They did talk about "red right retuning.") |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com