You must be a direct descendant of Mungo Man.

You said:

"Does that mean that the US and every other army in the World posesses
WMD?

GWB better organise an invasion..he can then use up his stocks of
weapons and claim that he's not a threat to World
security.....anymore."

Moral equivalence... do you get it yet?





OzOne wrote in message ...
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:49:48 GMT, "Gilligan"
scribbled thusly:


OzOne wrote in message
.. .


Maybe you should reassess your statements.

Maybe you should assess what you're standing in:

Moral equivalence
Moral equivalence is a term used in political debate, usually to
negatively
characterize the humanist claim that 'there can no moral or ethical
hierarchy decided between two sides in a conflict, nor in the actions or
tactics of the two sides.' The term has some limited currency in polemic
debates about the Cold War, and more currently, the Israel-Palestine
conflict. "Moral equivalence" arose as a polemic term-of-retort to "moral
relativism," which had been gaining use as an indictment against
political
foreign policy that appeared to use only a situation-based application of
widely-heldethical standards.



Waffle.....Please explain what the above rubbish has to do with the
400 tonnes of explosive that the US allowed to be removed.
Explosives that didn't consist of one single WMD.


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.