LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Scott Vernon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why didn't they hang Charlie Manson?

"John Cairns" wrote in message
. com...

"Peter Wiley" wrote in message
. ..

Actually I agree with you but the risk is that someone will let

them
out again. Aren't you guys about to repeal the 'three strikes'

law? I
know it's resulted in jailing a lot of people who are plain stupid
rather than dangerous but the idea, applied to people who commit

crimes
of violence, has a lot of merit IMO. I recall seeing stats

somewhere
(and we all know what they say about stats...) indicating the

majority
of crime was committed by the same small group of the population.

PDW


In most states judges have some discretion sentencing defendants,

which is a
good thing, after all, they are judges. We have a case here in

Michigan
where a confessed serial killer is due to be released from a Texas

jail-a
long convoluted story-and he has vowed to come back to these parts

and do
some more killing. The authorities in these parts are scrambling to

build
cases against him in Michigan, where if he goes to jail he'll never

see the
light of day as a free man. The ironic thing is that Texas is a

death
penalty state, has been for a while, this criminal's story is a good

example
of the unfairness of capital punishment, if there ever was a good

candidate
for killing, this is the guy, but he never got the death penalty.

http://www.detnews.com/2002/metro/02...a01-563796.htm

John Cairns




  #2   Report Post  
Jonathan Ganz
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Scott Vernon wrote:
Why didn't they hang Charlie Manson?


Because then we wouldn't have gotten to see him intimidate Geroldo.

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

  #3   Report Post  
John Cairns
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
Why didn't they hang Charlie Manson?

Big difference, Charlie's never going to leave jail alive. AFAIK, he did
receive the death penalty, the Supreme Court declared the death penalty
unconstitutional, threw out the penalty. BTW, he would have gotten the
chair, IIRC.
John Cairns
"John Cairns" wrote in message
. com...

"Peter Wiley" wrote in message
. ..

Actually I agree with you but the risk is that someone will let

them
out again. Aren't you guys about to repeal the 'three strikes'

law? I
know it's resulted in jailing a lot of people who are plain stupid
rather than dangerous but the idea, applied to people who commit

crimes
of violence, has a lot of merit IMO. I recall seeing stats

somewhere
(and we all know what they say about stats...) indicating the

majority
of crime was committed by the same small group of the population.

PDW


In most states judges have some discretion sentencing defendants,

which is a
good thing, after all, they are judges. We have a case here in

Michigan
where a confessed serial killer is due to be released from a Texas

jail-a
long convoluted story-and he has vowed to come back to these parts

and do
some more killing. The authorities in these parts are scrambling to

build
cases against him in Michigan, where if he goes to jail he'll never

see the
light of day as a free man. The ironic thing is that Texas is a

death
penalty state, has been for a while, this criminal's story is a good

example
of the unfairness of capital punishment, if there ever was a good

candidate
for killing, this is the guy, but he never got the death penalty.

http://www.detnews.com/2002/metro/02...a01-563796.htm

John Cairns






  #4   Report Post  
Scott Vernon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

that's my point. Is there anybody who deserves it more than Crazy
Charlie? It's costing us $$$ to keep him alive. He shoulda been
injected, then hung , shot and burned.

Scotty

"John Cairns" wrote in message
. com...

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
Why didn't they hang Charlie Manson?

Big difference, Charlie's never going to leave jail alive. AFAIK, he

did
receive the death penalty, the Supreme Court declared the death

penalty
unconstitutional, threw out the penalty. BTW, he would have gotten

the
chair, IIRC.
John Cairns




  #5   Report Post  
Jonathan Ganz
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Scott Vernon wrote:
that's my point. Is there anybody who deserves it more than Crazy
Charlie? It's costing us $$$ to keep him alive. He shoulda been
injected, then hung , shot and burned.


I have no sympathy at all for Charlie. However, I don't support his
execution. Although, I have to say that in his case, he seems to be
enjoying his stay behind bars.

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What does MIT say about ionization and lightning?? JAXAshby ASA 70 August 25th 04 09:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017