Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Peter Wiley wrote: Actually I agree with you but the risk is that someone will let them out again. Aren't you guys about to repeal the 'three strikes' law? I know it's resulted in jailing a lot of people who are plain stupid rather than dangerous but the idea, applied to people who commit crimes of violence, has a lot of merit IMO. I recall seeing stats somewhere (and we all know what they say about stats...) indicating the majority of crime was committed by the same small group of the population. The risk is minimal. Do you really expect anyone to let a serial killer out... ooops... well, let's not use that example. g But, mostly, life in prison without the possibility of parole, means exactly that. Also, if for example, DNA evidence turns up that exonerates someone, you don't have to dig them up. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What does MIT say about ionization and lightning?? | ASA |