In article et,
Maxprop wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

What hell difference does it make if the bills are PURELY democrat
initiatives. The WHOLE POINT is that bills should be bipartisan.
What you've said makes no sense.

Clinton faced the same problem with a republican congress. His post-94
signings were things such as NAFTA, a bipartisan effort. Clinton, too, got
a few of his pet initiatives passed, but once again only with the price of
GOP pork, etc.

So, what you're saying is that bipartisn legislation is a bad thing?
That's the whole point of our democracy!

But federalized health care will never be a bipartisan issue in this half
century. The members of Congress on the right side of the aisle will oppose
any initiative Kerry and his minions propose. And a lot of centrist
democrats will too. It's hollow campaign rhetoric.

You've got your head up your ass if you actually believe that this is
what is being proposed.
--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."