Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scout" wrote in message "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message True to the word... Where are these men when you need them the most.... It's because they're gone that we do. The era of politicians with principle and steel is gone. I fear we're going to be assaulted increasingly by those for whom campaign funds and special interests are their gods, and outright lies are their truths. Max |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article et,
Maxprop wrote: The era of politicians with principle and steel is gone. I fear we're going to be assaulted increasingly by those for whom campaign funds and special interests are their gods, and outright lies are their truths. Max, yet you support a guy who derided McCain for being unpatriotic, who in my opinion, comes closest to being honorable and electable. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message Maxprop wrote: The era of politicians with principle and steel is gone. I fear we're going to be assaulted increasingly by those for whom campaign funds and special interests are their gods, and outright lies are their truths. Max, yet you support a guy who derided McCain for being unpatriotic, who in my opinion, comes closest to being honorable and electable. I won't disagree with that. John McCain is too non-political to be a good politician in this climate. Max |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article et,
Gilligan wrote: Here's a quote from Barry Goldwater: on every roll call in the Senate. I am warning them today: I will fight them every step of the way if they try to dictate their moral convictions to all Americans in the name of 'conservatism.' " Do we have no honorable and electable politicians today? Bush is certainly not honorable, and Kerry, while better than Bush, may not be electable. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gilly,
I thought the world of Barry but there were time when he was really wrong ad couldn't see it. Do you believe he was right on his willing to use "the Bomb?" |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's how Goldwater considered using low yield atomic weapons:
"There have been several suggestions made. Defoliation of the forests by low-yield atomic weapons could well be done. When you remove the foliage, you remove the cover. We might have to (take action against China). Either that, or we have a war dragged out and dragged out. a defensive war is never won. If we decide to go into this war in a full-scale way, certainly we would have to make the decision on strategic supplies for the enemy at the same time. " He merely wanted to use them to clear away the brush to get at the Communists. In that capacity, atomic weapons may have been much less deadly than Agent Orange. Certainly, they would have been more cost effective. "The bomb" is only as good as the will to use it. I applaud Mr. Goldwater for striking fear into our enemies. Remember Thom, the sun is an uncontrolled fusion reaction spewing its waste products directly at earth. You have a much greater cancer risk from 8 hours in the sun without sunscreen than livng next to Three Mile Island for 70 years. Gilligan "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Gilly, I thought the world of Barry but there were time when he was really wrong ad couldn't see it. Do you believe he was right on his willing to use "the Bomb?" |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gilligan" wrote in message news ![]() Here's a quote from Barry Goldwater: "However, on religious issues there can be little or no compromise. There is snip Now there was a man with principles and spine! What he said then is so applicable today. In your heart, you know he's right! Ahhhh.... the good old days .... when Republicans were able to articulate their thoughts!!! Regards Donal -- |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Donal" wrote in message Ahhhh.... the good old days .... when Republicans were able to articulate their thoughts!!! Ahhh . . . . the good old days. . . . when politicians, in general, weren't forced to lie to get elected. Oh, wait, I forgot. Barry G. didn't get elected, did he? Max |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Maxprop" wrote
Oh, wait, I forgot. Barry G. didn't get elected, did he? Nope. When asked about Vietnam he honestly answered that as a Senator he lacked the info needed but would either win or pull out depending on that info. LBJ swore "I will never send your son to Vietnam!". LBJ won and promptly sent 50,000 mothers' sons to die in 'nam. Says much about the gullibility of our electorate. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
But he never lied either!
Gilligan "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Donal" wrote in message Ahhhh.... the good old days .... when Republicans were able to articulate their thoughts!!! Ahhh . . . . the good old days. . . . when politicians, in general, weren't forced to lie to get elected. Oh, wait, I forgot. Barry G. didn't get elected, did he? Max |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Absolute proof (On topic) | General | |||
Absolute must read | ASA | |||
Some brilliance for an otherwise dull group | ASA | |||
new sailboats for sale - ABSOLUTE BERGAIN | ASA | |||
No, that's not brilliance. | ASA |