In article , Nav
wrote:

Peter Wiley wrote:



Hate to tell you this, Nav, but there *are* no land-based predators
big enough to tackle a human. None.



Wot, you killed all the nasty bitey stingy critters? There are lots of
predators...


Sigh. That's so idiotic I'm not even going to bother. When you get back
on your Ritalin and have your ADHD under control, re-read the simple
sentence I wrote and see if you understand it this time round.



Yep, I know what a predator is. I know what land based is. I know that
tackling a human in this conetx means interacting with one and not
running away. I would say that many snakes etc. would therefore meet
your crtieria. Perhaps you need to formulate your ideas more clearly?

Nope. You need to work on connecting up the individual bits of
information within the context of the thread. Perhaps someone else will
help you out.

PDW

Peter Wiley wrote:

In article , Nav
wrote:


Peter Wiley wrote:



Hate to tell you this, Nav, but there *are* no land-based predators
big enough to tackle a human. None.



Wot, you killed all the nasty bitey stingy critters? There are lots of
predators...


Sigh. That's so idiotic I'm not even going to bother. When you get back
on your Ritalin and have your ADHD under control, re-read the simple
sentence I wrote and see if you understand it this time round.



Yep, I know what a predator is. I know what land based is. I know that
tackling a human in this conetx means interacting with one and not
running away. I would say that many snakes etc. would therefore meet
your crtieria. Perhaps you need to formulate your ideas more clearly?


Nope. You need to work on connecting up the individual bits of
information within the context of the thread. Perhaps someone else will
help you out.



The thread had developed into whether the outback is dangerous... I
guess you must have ADHD?

Cheers

In article , Nav
wrote:

Peter Wiley wrote:

In article , Nav
wrote:


Peter Wiley wrote:



Hate to tell you this, Nav, but there *are* no land-based predators
big enough to tackle a human. None.



Wot, you killed all the nasty bitey stingy critters? There are lots of
predators...


Sigh. That's so idiotic I'm not even going to bother. When you get back
on your Ritalin and have your ADHD under control, re-read the simple
sentence I wrote and see if you understand it this time round.



Yep, I know what a predator is. I know what land based is. I know that
tackling a human in this conetx means interacting with one and not
running away. I would say that many snakes etc. would therefore meet
your crtieria. Perhaps you need to formulate your ideas more clearly?


Nope. You need to work on connecting up the individual bits of
information within the context of the thread. Perhaps someone else will
help you out.

The thread had developed into whether the outback is dangerous...

Nice slide but no prize. Try reading above. I repeat, there are *no*
land-based predators big enough to tackle a human in Australia. None.
If you want to dispute that statement, list the predators who prey on
humans.

I
guess you must have ADHD?

Not that I've noticed recently.

PDW