In article ,
Dave wrote:
Correction. Kerry's temper tantrum was over $7.5 billion going to
Halliburton, not $20 billion.

What?? You lied previously or was it an honest mistake?? No, don't
tell us.



--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

OK Dave,

Is that the "Spin" you are going to go with about Cheney's Lie? He only
meant in the Senate? A very, very poor attempt.

First; That isn't what Cheney said..
Second: I think if you check, Cheney said "The first time I laid eyes on
you were when you walk on stage Tonight" ( Proven a Lie) It wasn't your
buddies only that picked it up. Just about every News Media ran for
their Archives to find the pictures.
Third: If you check the Senate records. When Cheney who said he was in
the Senate on Tuesdays, when Edwards is on record voting, What the Hell
was he doing that he wasn't aware of Edwards? (Somebody is lying! I'm
sure the Senate records can prove who)
Fourth: At best Cheney is caught in a lie, but worse it was a lying,
cheap character assassination. He owes Edwards a public apology. That is
if your "Spin off" can't be proved.

Ole Thom

In article ,
Thom Stewart wrote:
OK Dave,

Is that the "Spin" you are going to go with about Cheney's Lie? He only
meant in the Senate? A very, very poor attempt.

First; That isn't what Cheney said..
Second: I think if you check, Cheney said "The first time I laid eyes on
you were when you walk on stage Tonight" ( Proven a Lie) It wasn't your
buddies only that picked it up. Just about every News Media ran for
their Archives to find the pictures.
Third: If you check the Senate records. When Cheney who said he was in
the Senate on Tuesdays, when Edwards is on record voting, What the Hell
was he doing that he wasn't aware of Edwards? (Somebody is lying! I'm
sure the Senate records can prove who)
Fourth: At best Cheney is caught in a lie, but worse it was a lying,
cheap character assassination. He owes Edwards a public apology. That is
if your "Spin off" can't be proved.

I just saw a video of them at the same conference on the same stage.


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 7 Oct 2004 14:40:55 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz)
said:

There's no Santa Clause but there is a Santa Claus. Everyone knows
that.

Ah, so we should rely on Kerry's belief in Santa Claus I take it.

It's not open to conjecture. Santa Claus exists! Are you trying to sow
the seeds of doubt in Horass' mind?


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

On 8 Oct 2004 16:48:33 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 20:38:24 GMT, felton said:

Cheney’s name didn’t appear on this letter but
Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz signed it along with Insider luminaries Robert
Zoellick, Richard Perle, John Bolton, Elliott Abrams, and Richard
Armitage. These are the very individuals who fill many important posts
in the current Bush administration. "

You're digging yourself in deeper with every post. First you point me to a
website that falsely insinuates that Cheney sent such a letter. Then when
that's shown to be a lie you retort "Yea, but a bunch of his friends sent
it." LOL. You gonna try and wiggle out by pointing to the language that says
every "prominent" member signed it, and Cheney wasn't "prominent" like the
named individuals? That would be of a piece with the Dems' usual sophomoric
word games.

To repeat, it illustrates once again how you
and your friends repeatedly play fast and loose with the facts.

Is it possible he didn't sign it because he didn't agree with some of its
contents? Nah, not in your vast right-wing conspiracy world.


http://www.bushpresident2004.com/pnac.htm

"When PNAC was formed five years later, it was chaired by Paul
Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, I. Lewis Libby, Richard
Perle, Jeb Bush and others."


I tire of explaining things to you, Dave, as everything that threatens
your ignorant and uninformed beliefs you dismiss as propaganda or from
"biased" sources. Cheney was not just on the mailing list of the
organization, he was a founder and chaired the PNAC, which sent the
letter. If you can conjure some mythical means by which to assume
that Cheney's *real* beliefs are substantially different from the
PNAC, then feel free.

Dave is a known LIAR. He and Cheney must be sleeping together. They're
stories are identical.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"felton" wrote in message
news
On 8 Oct 2004 16:48:33 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 20:38:24 GMT, felton said:

Cheney's name didn't appear on this letter but
Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz signed it along with Insider luminaries Robert
Zoellick, Richard Perle, John Bolton, Elliott Abrams, and Richard
Armitage. These are the very individuals who fill many important posts
in the current Bush administration. "

You're digging yourself in deeper with every post. First you point me to a
website that falsely insinuates that Cheney sent such a letter. Then when
that's shown to be a lie you retort "Yea, but a bunch of his friends sent
it." LOL. You gonna try and wiggle out by pointing to the language that
says
every "prominent" member signed it, and Cheney wasn't "prominent" like the
named individuals? That would be of a piece with the Dems' usual
sophomoric
word games.

To repeat, it illustrates once again how you
and your friends repeatedly play fast and loose with the facts.

Is it possible he didn't sign it because he didn't agree with some of its
contents? Nah, not in your vast right-wing conspiracy world.


http://www.bushpresident2004.com/pnac.htm

"When PNAC was formed five years later, it was chaired by Paul
Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, I. Lewis Libby, Richard
Perle, Jeb Bush and others."


I tire of explaining things to you, Dave, as everything that threatens
your ignorant and uninformed beliefs you dismiss as propaganda or from
"biased" sources. Cheney was not just on the mailing list of the
organization, he was a founder and chaired the PNAC, which sent the
letter. If you can conjure some mythical means by which to assume
that Cheney's *real* beliefs are substantially different from the
PNAC, then feel free.

The misleading statement made by Cheney?? No, it wasn't misleading. It was
a bald-headed LIE.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On 08 Oct 2004 22:49:24 GMT, (Bobsprit) said:

Dave, just admit it already. It's embarassing for you at this point.

On the contrary. I'm totally amazed that you and your friends continue to
defend the use of such misleading statements.

Please explain the accounting misconception. I'm all ears.


And no brains.


RB