In article ,
Dave wrote:
Correction. Kerry's temper tantrum was over $7.5 billion going to
Halliburton, not $20 billion.

What?? You lied previously or was it an honest mistake?? No, don't
tell us.



--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 07 Oct 2004 04:12:09 GMT, (SAIL LOCO) said:

If they arn't allies what are they?

Lost cause, Loco. Ganz will continue to defend the Dems' childish fast and
loose treatment of the facts.

Mr. Poodle is pretty fast and loose with ad hominim attacks when it
suits him, isn't he??




--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 7 Oct 2004 12:05:24 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz)
said:

Actually, my radio listening habits are generally restricted to NPR and WQXR
(the local classical station operated by the Times).

Dave, please don't lie. It makes you look sillly.

I'm not surprised that you would find it hard to believe someone would do
such a thing. It's no doubt far from your experience. But it happens to be
true.

Of course the truth of a statement never seems to deter you from calling its
author a liar, as you've abundantly demonstrated.

Dave, you need to calm down. I was just kidding.

As though the others don't.

Why am I not surprised that you wouldn't distinguish between privately owned
businesses who are, and should be, entitled so set their own agendas, and
entities funded in part by involuntary contributions called taxes?

Ummm.... what about the FCC? Is that privately funded? Don't our tax
dollars support their enforcement, etc.?

I'll confess to mixed views on whether we should have these broadcasters
that feed from the public trough. I enjoy many of NPR's programs, and

Please don't confess to me. I'm not a priest.




--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 18:49:21 GMT, felton said:

Those reasons and the obvious connections
with Cheney would raise questions in any thinking person's mind about
the highly unusual "no bid" contracts.

The difference is the some of us thinking persons actually follow up the
answers to those questions. The folks who unthinkingly chant "Halliburton"
at every opportunity don't want you to bother with the facts.

Facts like the fact that Halliburton has undo influence in the White
House because Dick Cheney has conflicted loyalties. Actually, strike
that. His loyalties are well-known.


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 7 Oct 2004 12:14:53 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz)
said:

Lost cause, Loco. Ganz will continue to defend the Dems' childish fast and
loose treatment of the facts.

Mr. Poodle is pretty fast and loose with ad hominim attacks when it
suits him, isn't he??

Criticism of specific behavior is not an ad hominem (note the spelling)
attack, though I understand the truth may be painful to you.

Since when have you been interested in the truth?


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 7 Oct 2004 13:25:49 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz)
said:

Why am I not surprised that you wouldn't distinguish between privately owned
businesses who are, and should be, entitled so set their own agendas, and
entities funded in part by involuntary contributions called taxes?

Ummm.... what about the FCC? Is that privately funded? Don't our tax
dollars support their enforcement, etc.?

If you can't see the difference between the functions of the FCC and NPR,
you need to go back to grade school civics class.

Actually, I can see the difference, but that's not the question. The
issue was that network aren't tied to public money. They are because we
have the FCC watching over their shoulders.



--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 7 Oct 2004 13:27:20 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz)
said:

Facts like the fact that Halliburton has undo influence in the White
House because Dick Cheney has conflicted loyalties. Actually, strike
that. His loyalties are well-known.

Only among your circle of rabid true believers who accept it as an article
of faith.

Dave, it's documented. Check the website Cheney promoted!


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

OzOne wrote:

On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 06:57:40 -0400, Horvath
scribbled thusly:


On 6 Oct 2004 22:08:32 -0700, (Jonathan
Ganz) wrote this crap:

LOL, you're an idiot. That doesn't change the fact that Bush doesn't
have a plan and never did.


He's been doing pretty good so far.



Bwaaahahahhaahahhahaahhahahahahhahaaa!



He means:

He dun gud so far.

Cheers

On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 14:22:31 GMT, wrote
this crap:


My best guess, based on Horvath's posts about the debate is that he
thought the guy on the right (wing) side of his TV screen must be
Cheney, and the guy on the left (wing) must be Edwards.


You are really stupid, aren't you? I didn't see the debate. I never
said I did.






Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

On 7 Oct 2004 11:59:39 -0700, (Jonathan
Ganz) wrote this crap:


Edwards lied. He gave out a website address that went to George
Soros's website, and claimed it was a fact check website.


Horass you stupid fool... Cheney gave out the website!


Really? That's not what I read in the liberal media.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!