In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 6 Oct 2004 10:56:53 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz)
said:

I especially thought he looked vice-
presidential when he LIED about the body count not being 90% our
troops.

On the contrary, that was one of Edwards's poorer moments. The Journal
pointed out several days ago how phony the Kerry numbers were both as to
cost and share of human lives lost by the U.S. compared to other countries.
About time somebody called them on it. Of course that won't keep the Kerry
folks from continuing to throw about their fib.

Bull****. We've suffered the highest casualties of the "coalition" of
the bribed. We're the ones who have sustained 90% of the losses are
hefting 90% of the cost. Cheney LIED.

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

If the Times called it a draw, you can be sure it was in fact a blow-out
victory for Cheney.

Davey, this just proves how biased you are. I'm an honest man, unlike you. The
debate was a win for Edwards, but only marginally. No one is calling it a
blowout. I heard both men make accurate attacks. I heard (or didn't) both men
ignore some accusations.
Get real. Now we'll see if Kerry can score a second victory on Friday or if
Bush will even it up.

RB

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 6 Oct 2004 10:54:30 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz)
said:

The Boob is clearly a media something but a monitor he isn't. The NY Times
said it was a draw. Boob, your making this stuff up.

I thought the NYT was part of the left-leaning press?? You can't have
it both ways. Well, you can if you're Horass.

If the Times called it a draw, you can be sure it was in fact a blow-out
victory for Cheney.

If the Times called it a draw, they were being generous. Most people
who can think at a level greater than 2nd grade know that Cheney at
best did better than Bush. And, that's not saying much.


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

On the contrary, that was one of Edwards's poorer moments. The Journal
pointed out several days ago how phony the Kerry numbers were both as to
cost and share of human lives lost by the U.S. compared to other countries.
About time somebody called them on it.


Yes, CNN reported the American lives lost amount to 88.5% instead of 90. And
cost is closer o 120 billion. Anyway you cut it, Edwards hit the nail on the
head.
Yeah, score one for the Bush team! Bwahahahahahahahaha!

RB

Most people
who can think at a level greater than 2nd grade know that Cheney at
best did better than Bush. And, that's not saying much.


That's exactly what they said on CNBC at one point; that Cheney won some points
by being more focused than Bush. Cheney is certainly smarter than Bush. He's
also more evil.

RB

In article ,
Bobsprit wrote:
On the contrary, that was one of Edwards's poorer moments. The Journal
pointed out several days ago how phony the Kerry numbers were both as to
cost and share of human lives lost by the U.S. compared to other countries.
About time somebody called them on it.


Yes, CNN reported the American lives lost amount to 88.5% instead of 90. And
cost is closer o 120 billion. Anyway you cut it, Edwards hit the nail on the
head.
Yeah, score one for the Bush team! Bwahahahahahahahaha!

Yep. And, if you use the projected costs for next year, the $200B is
true. And, we all know it's going to be more than "projected."




--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

On 06 Oct 2004 12:04:46 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

You are clearly nuts. I'm watching Fox right now, and they're going
on and on about how Cheney spanked Edwards. Either you're crazy, or
you're lying. Pick one.


Hey, Dopey...I'm a media monitor. Do you know what that is?
Edwards was declared the winner in EVERY POLL.


Not at all, liar. In my town, it was called a draw.




Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

In article ,
Horvath wrote:
On 06 Oct 2004 12:04:46 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

You are clearly nuts. I'm watching Fox right now, and they're going
on and on about how Cheney spanked Edwards. Either you're crazy, or
you're lying. Pick one.


Hey, Dopey...I'm a media monitor. Do you know what that is?
Edwards was declared the winner in EVERY POLL.


Not at all, liar. In my town, it was called a draw.

Yeah, your town... the home of the professional liars.

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 06 Oct 2004 21:23:27 GMT, (Bobsprit) said:

If the Times called it a draw, you can be sure it was in fact a blow-out
victory for Cheney.

Davey, this just proves how biased you are. I'm an honest man, unlike you. The
debate was a win for Edwards, but only marginally. No one is calling it a
blowout.

Like Jonathan, you need to read a bit more carefully for meaning. My remarks
were not directed toward who won the debate, but to the Times's heavily
biased reporting. Had you been reading my other posts (and I suspect you
were) and reading carefully, you would have noted that my summary was
advantage Cheney by a small margin.

Like a bad poodle, you piddle where you shouldn't. Cheney LIED.


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 6 Oct 2004 14:24:36 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz)
said:

Most people
who can think at a level greater than 2nd grade know that Cheney at
best did better than Bush.

Most of us who read this group know that's bull. Polls were divided as to
the winner. Disregard for a moment your foolish notion that anyone who
differs from your point of view is by definition not as smart as you.

Most?? Hahahaha... maybe most of the idiots. Even a percentage of them
are smart enough to keep their mouth shut from time to time. I guess
you're not one of them.


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."