I have the NY times right here. They said that the debate was "nearly a
draw"
and that "Cheney failed to respond to Edward's attacks" and they "gave the edge
to Edwards for surprising many with his aggressive attack."
Draw? Don't think so! .

Well, I guess the NY Times printed 2 editions this morning since the national
news quoted the NY Times as saying the debate was a draw. I guess the second
edition goes to your apartment building.
S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster"
"Trains are a winter sport"

Well, I guess the NY Times printed 2 editions this morning since the national
news quoted the NY Times as saying the debate was a draw.


Try READING the text below the headlines.

RB

In article ,
Horvath wrote:
On 06 Oct 2004 02:23:20 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

I can't believe how easily Edwards dismantled Cheney. Edwards was very
impressive. Cheney is staring off into space at the moment as Edwards tears him
down. Cheney just passed on a response...amazing!

You must have been heavily drinking during the debate.

While it wasn't quite as obvious as the Kerry/Bush faceoff, it was
still a defeat. Cheney didn't do very well. Cheney has no political
ambitions because he's unelectable on his own.
--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Horvath wrote:
On 06 Oct 2004 10:13:01 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

You must have been heavily drinking during the debate.


CNN, FOX, CNBC, AOL, NY TIMES and every other source poll declares Edwards the
winner. Guess we were all drinking!


You are clearly nuts. I'm watching Fox right now, and they're going
on and on about how Cheney spanked Edwards. Either you're crazy, or
you're lying. Pick one.

Ok. You're stupid!

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Martin Baxter wrote:
Bobsprit wrote:

You are clearly nuts. I'm watching Fox right now, and they're going
on and on about how Cheney spanked Edwards. Either you're crazy, or
you're lying. Pick one.


Hey, Dopey...I'm a media monitor. Do you know what that is?
Edwards was declared the winner in EVERY POLL.


NPR declared it more or less a draw this morning.

IMHO, mostly less. I guess NPR is one of those left-leaning news
services.

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
SAIL LOCO wrote:
The Boob is clearly a media something but a monitor he isn't. The NY Times
said it was a draw. Boob, your making this stuff up.

I thought the NYT was part of the left-leaning press?? You can't have
it both ways. Well, you can if you're Horass.


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 06 Oct 2004 15:20:06 GMT, (Bobsprit) said:

They said that the debate was "nearly a draw"
and that "Cheney failed to respond to Edward's attacks"

That one's really a hoot. The most telling point in the debate was when
Edwards was asked how he expected to bring allies aboard when the two major
potential allies have already said "no thanks, even if Kerry is elected."
Edwards managed to yammer on for the entire two minutes without once coming
close to addressing the question asked. It's a pity that Cheney didn't come
back with a simple "Could you please repeat the question for the Senator. He
doesn't seem to have heard it."

That was probably Edwards' weakest moment. Of course, Cheney had
plenty of his as well. I especially thought he looked vice-
presidential when he LIED about the body count not being 90% our
troops.

I'm hardly surprised at the Times, given their obvious inclinations.

But loco said they called it a draw?? doesn't sound left-leaning to me
Mr. Poodle.


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Joe wrote:
Horvath wrote in message . ..
On 06 Oct 2004 02:23:20 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

I can't believe how easily Edwards dismantled Cheney. Edwards was very
impressive. Cheney is staring off into space at the moment as Edwards tears him
down. Cheney just passed on a response...amazing!

You must have been heavily drinking during the debate.

Bobspirt does not drink.

He must of been doing acid or PCP.

It would be cocaine and alcohol, but it's Bush not Bob.

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:21:42 -0400, "Vito" said:

I had mixed feelings. There was Cheney, arguably the most powerful man in
the world after his boss, as humble and homey as anybody's grandfather while
Edwards barked like a rat terrier.

I rather enjoyed one commentator's comment that Cheney reminded him of a
father bringing his son home from the first year of college after the son
had not had a particularly good year.

Good one! Bush needs to try again, but this time he can go back to
Crawford for the next term.


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 6 Oct 2004 10:53:34 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz)
said:

NPR declared it more or less a draw this morning.

IMHO, mostly less. I guess NPR is one of those left-leaning news
services.

Perhaps one of the most left-leaning among majors. It's truly pathetic how
taxpayer money is being used to promote the left's agenda. Accordingly all
the more surprising where they came down on this one.

Yeh, I think we should immediately get rid of all public service
projects. Let's turn over all that crap to the churches and fund them
directly. Oh wait, that's what the right-wing wackos want. I didn't
need to say a thing.



--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."