Bush also called for the end to soft money.

John Kerry has not.

OoozeOne wrote


http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...5E1702,00.html

JOHN Kerry could be proud of his record as a decorated Vietnam War
veteran, US President George W. Bush said today, as controversy
continued to swirl over attacks by a pro-Bush veterans' group on his
presidential rival.

"John Kerry served admirably and ought to be proud of his record," Mr
Bush told reporters at a press conference

Why should he? It took Bush how long to distance himself from
the Vets for Untruth??

It's ok for Bush to profit from their agenda, but it's not ok
for Kerry.

In article ,
Bart Senior wrote:
Bush also called for the end to soft money.

John Kerry has not.

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

On 24 Aug 2004 10:11:19 -0700, (Jonathan
Ganz) wrote:

Why should he? It took Bush how long to distance himself from
the Vets for Untruth??

It's ok for Bush to profit from their agenda, but it's not ok
for Kerry.

Actually the whole reason these smear campaigns are done by third
party throw away fringe groups is for plausible deniability. With all
these connections and the clear patterns to the last election, the
"plausible" part has too many holes these days. Bush hasn't condemned
the ad. He gives lip service to Kerry's record and lets the smear
campaign continue. Vintage Rove/Bush. That is all they have to run
on.


In article ,
Bart Senior wrote:
Bush also called for the end to soft money.

John Kerry has not.