Jonathan Ganz wrote:
That's not true on the SF bay. Tugs with barges have stand on.


I would want to read the nav regs for SF bay before I agreed fully with
that.
I believe the bay has a number of "traffic separation schemes" which
fall under SF traffic and thus "shall not impede" becomes important.
However, this is not a clear "stand-on" condition although many treat it
as such and justifiably so.

otn

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 03:38:10 GMT, something compelled otnmbrd
, to say:



Jonathan Ganz wrote:
That's not true on the SF bay. Tugs with barges have stand on.


I would want to read the nav regs for SF bay before I agreed fully with
that.
I believe the bay has a number of "traffic separation schemes" which
fall under SF traffic and thus "shall not impede" becomes important.
However, this is not a clear "stand-on" condition although many treat it
as such and justifiably so.


F=MA. It's all you really need to know.