Hey Doug, where's the beef?
 

On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 14:36:17 +0000, Bart Senior wrote:


Now Moore is really scary. If Kerry has denounced him, I'd feel a lot
better about Kerry. When he didn't I had to place him over there with
Moore. Kerry really isolated him from much of America with that.

Now, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth is really scary. If Bush had denounced
them, I'd feel a lot better about Bush. When he didn't, I had to place
him over there with Spaeth. Bush really isolated himself from much of
America with that.

http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial...06/1054623.asp

Hey Doug, where's the beef?
 

"Bart Senior" wrote in message

Limbaugh would be counting the day;'s until the next
election, and begin every day with telling everyone
"XX days of Kerry tyranny to go."

What do you think the extremist liberals will do,
when Kerry loses? They will scream the election
was fixed and start impeachment proceedings.

What the country needs right now is continuity,
not change.

What the country really needs is an administration that will unite rather
than polarize the country. Sadly neither Bush nor Kerry will fit that role.
Even worse, it will probably take another brutal attack by terrorists to
unite the country, but, as before, that unity will be short lived, with
recriminations starting soon afterward.

Katysails said it best: (to paraphrase) when one is faced with two
undesirable alternatives, stick with the one with which you are familiar.
Bush.

Max

Hey Doug, where's the beef?
 

"Horvath" wrote in message


dumbass.
dumbass.

You certainly like that term, doncha? Why not shut up and quit making
conservatives look so stupid.

Max

Hey Doug, where's the beef?
 

"Bart Senior" wrote in message


"Bart Senior" wrote in message

I don't really believe Kerry is an extremist liberal, but he certainly
is
about as far left as anyone in the Senate these days, by virtue of his
voting record. That said, he has a long way to go to be as extreme as
Michael Moore. But in this particular campaign there is so much
rhetoric

I was comparing Kerry to his cohorts in Congress.
You are right, he is nowhere as extremist as Moore.

coming from the far left--Kerry really has not distanced himself from
the
likes of Moore, Franken, and Dean--that it is easy to equate the
Kerry/Edwards campaign with the extremists.
]
Now Moore is really scary. If Kerry has denounced
him, I'd feel a lot better about Kerry. When he didn't
I had to place him over there with Moore. Kerry really
isolated him(self) from much of America with that.

I agree to a point. The other day Kerry was voicing his outrage that W
spent 7 more minutes reading to school children after being informed that
the WTC had been attacked. THAT is right out of F911. Kerry claims that HE
would have excused himself and gotten down to business. Doing what????
What could seven minutes have allowed him to do, especially since everyone
was waiting for more info at that point. Kerry's bone of contention is a
very minor point at best, and one without any particular merit. But he has
so little to work with this campaign that he'll jump on anything, including
something as silly as this. But he needs to use caution: if the middle
ground folks (that vaunted "undecided" zone) think he's associated with the
LW extremists, he could hurt himself more than help. My personal take:
Bush demonstrated calm and cool under fire. Rather than simply react, he
continued his job at hand and then left. The left loves to call
conservatives "reactionaries." Hmmm.

It makes him ostensibly the most liberal senator, but an extremist?

If he is at one extreme in the Senate, then how far to the left
would he go if unchecked? Since he won't declare his position,
or take the NPAT test, we have no idea what he will do!

. . . which is precisely what scares me most about him. With a democrat
majority in one or both houses, he could dismanted much of the good works of
many past presidents and congresses. He could plunge us into even greater
debt at the government feeding trough for those who choose not to be
productive. He could dismantle an already abbreviated military. And he
could clog the Supreme Court with liberals for another several decades.
THAT is what scares me most. The Constitution could ultimately end up being
as unimportant as Bill Clinton's book, God could be a word not allowed to be
spoken in public, and Roe vs. Wade could be expanded to include children up
to and including one year of age, if undesirable to their parents. :-o
(Sorry, there's no emoticon for 'tongue-in-cheek,' but you get my drift.)

It would be tough to paint Kerry as anything other than a liberal. He

That is what they are trying to do. It's funny because hear we have
a man, that is extremely liberal, who won the party nominiation
because of this, and yet tries to hide it.

You really think so? That's akin to attempting to hide an elephant behind
the drapes. Only the pathologically stupid would take Kerry or Edwards for
centrists. If they are trying to talk the centrist talk, then it's
contingent upon the Bush campaign to point out the truth.

Max

Hey Doug, where's the beef?
 

"thunder" wrote in message

On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 14:36:17 +0000, Bart Senior wrote:


Now Moore is really scary. If Kerry has denounced him, I'd feel a lot
better about Kerry. When he didn't I had to place him over there with
Moore. Kerry really isolated him from much of America with that.

Now, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth is really scary. If Bush had denounced
them, I'd feel a lot better about Bush. When he didn't, I had to place
him over there with Spaeth. Bush really isolated himself from much of
America with that.

Guess that makes both sides about even, eh?

Max

Hey Doug, where's the beef?
 

S-h-h-h-h.... he's a Liberal Mole... planted deep within the Conservative
agenda. It's his job to make all Conservatives look like inbred idiots!!

He was doing a bang up job till you slipped up!

CM

"Maxprop" wrote in message
ink.net...
|
| "Horvath" wrote in message
|
|
| dumbass.
| dumbass.
|
| You certainly like that term, doncha? Why not shut up and quit making
| conservatives look so stupid.
|
| Max
|
|

Hey Doug, where's the beef?
 

My personal choice would be McCain.

Of the Democrats, I like Lieberman the best.

Niether of these two scare me.

"Maxprop" wrote

"Bart Senior" wrote in message

Limbaugh would be counting the day;'s until the next
election, and begin every day with telling everyone
"XX days of Kerry tyranny to go."

What do you think the extremist liberals will do,
when Kerry loses? They will scream the election
was fixed and start impeachment proceedings.

What the country needs right now is continuity,
not change.

What the country really needs is an administration that will unite rather
than polarize the country. Sadly neither Bush nor Kerry will fit that
role.
Even worse, it will probably take another brutal attack by terrorists to
unite the country, but, as before, that unity will be short lived, with
recriminations starting soon afterward.

Katysails said it best: (to paraphrase) when one is faced with two
undesirable alternatives, stick with the one with which you are familiar.
Bush.

Max

Hey Doug, where's the beef?
 

No. I mean you guys.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
link.net...

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

Here's my prediction: After Kerry wins in November,
you and your right-wing wacko friends will be totally
silent.

You are obviously no student of human nature, Jon. Have you forgotten all
the flak Clinton took during his 8 years? Do you honestly believe Rush
Limbaugh will be "silent" following a Kerry victory? LOL.

Max

Hey Doug, where's the beef?
 

Well, the democrats probably will if it's anything like
Florida. Maybe we can get the president of diebold
to stop making huge contributions to the republicans.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Bart Senior" wrote in message
. net...
Limbaugh would be counting the day;'s until the next
election, and begin every day with telling everyone
"XX days of Kerry tyranny to go."

What do you think the extremist liberals will do,
when Kerry loses? They will scream the election
was fixed and start impeachment proceedings.

What the country needs right now is continuity,
not change.

"Maxprop" wrote

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

Here's my prediction: After Kerry wins in November,
you and your right-wing wacko friends will be totally
silent.

You are obviously no student of human nature, Jon. Have you forgotten
all
the flak Clinton took during his 8 years? Do you honestly believe Rush
Limbaugh will be "silent" following a Kerry victory? LOL.

Max

Hey Doug, where's the beef?
 

Kerry didn't seem to have any problems uniting his swift boat
crew, nor did he have trouble in the senate. Bush didn't have
any trouble uniting the cops that pulled him over for being
drunk. I don't see your point.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
link.net...

"Bart Senior" wrote in message

Limbaugh would be counting the day;'s until the next
election, and begin every day with telling everyone
"XX days of Kerry tyranny to go."

What do you think the extremist liberals will do,
when Kerry loses? They will scream the election
was fixed and start impeachment proceedings.

What the country needs right now is continuity,
not change.

What the country really needs is an administration that will unite rather
than polarize the country. Sadly neither Bush nor Kerry will fit that
role.
Even worse, it will probably take another brutal attack by terrorists to
unite the country, but, as before, that unity will be short lived, with
recriminations starting soon afterward.

Katysails said it best: (to paraphrase) when one is faced with two
undesirable alternatives, stick with the one with which you are familiar.
Bush.

Max