| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Z-Z-Z-Z-Z--Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-z-z-z-z-z-z--z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z
CM "Anonymous Sender" wrote in message acolo.com... | Troop Talk | Soldiers on Iraq. | by Robert Alt | National Review | July 22, 2004 | http://www.nationalreview.com/alt/alt200407220834.asp | | TUZ, IRAQ - As I walked into the barracks, Sgt. Kevin Porter, a 23-year- | old trooper in the Ohio National Guard serving south of Kirkuk, Iraq, | called me over. He had just received a package from his family in | Bellaire, Ohio, which included a then-weeks-old copy of his local | newspaper. The op-ed page featured a column by Andy Rooney opining | about the character and morale of servicemen in Iraq. Rooney offered | five questions that he wished a reporter would ask the soldiers, a | group he dubbed "victims" rather than "heroes." Although Sgt. Porter is | not someone who frequently talked politics or current events, Rooney's | article struck a nerve with him and his fellow troopers. He asked if I | would assist him and the others in responding to Rooney's questions. | | Some rightly may wonder why ink should be spilt on what is necessarily | a belated response to Rooney, whose banal "did you ever notice" | segments on 60 Minutes have come to epitomize journalistic navel | gazing. It is worth noting that Rooney was not always a curmudgeonly | caricature. During WWII, his combat reporting for Stars and Stripes | earned him the Bronze Star. Because of his admirable service, many | Americans still lend their ears to what he has to say about our | soldiers. | | Unfortunately, Mr. Rooney seems to have joined the ranks of journalists | whose political disagreements with the current president and open | disdain for the war in Iraq cloud their already questionable judgment. | In this way, Rooney's tirades about and condescension toward the | soldiers are typical of a sizable segment of today's journalists, who | according to a recent Pew Center survey are as a whole more liberal | than the public for whom they report. And so, after being told for the | past year - by those who are not fighting - how the war and | reconstruction are going and how the troops are faring, it's past time | the troops had their say. | | Many of Rooney's questions are skewed in a naked attempt to elicit his | desired response. To the extent that he was not simply trying to score | rhetorical points in his column, this reflects a belief that the | soldiers can be easily led by the nose to tout a particular line. I do | not share this opinion, and therefore I let Rooney's questions stand in | an attempt to show his calculation wrong. I did not color his | questions, but assured they were asked verbatim by requesting that the | servicemen read Rooney's written questions before answering. To the | extent possible, I interviewed the troopers separately, so that they | would not be influenced by another's response, and I made efforts to | ensure that the most "pro-Rooney" responses I found for each question | were included here. (In the era of Dowd, I should also note that any | ellipses are not offered to alter the content, but for the traditional | reasons of conciseness, grammar, and to show pauses.) | | Rooney's first question was "Do you think your country did the right | thing sending you into Iraq?" Cpl. Caleb Clark of Cuyahoga Falls | offered an emphatic response: "Absolutely. I think that what we are | doing over here has a direct effect on international terrorism. And I | think the government should continue to send soldiers over here until | the job is done. I feel that we would be cheating the soldiers who went | before us if we didn't finish the job." Sgt. Porter shared the view of | many soldiers who looked at the impact for future generations: "I think | we did the right thing for the simple fact that if we didn't, then our | sons or grandchildren would have to come over here and do the same | thing." Spc. David James of North Royalton offered his usual | candor: "Yeah, I think as a whole, I'm glad we're over here; and me, | I'm glad to be part of that whole.... If we didn't step up, who the | hell would?" Spc. Daniel Richmond of Akron saw the benefits for both | countries: "[T]he country needed our help. And we needed to come over | here for our own safety: to help our country deal with the terrorism. | And to help them set themselves up with a better government, so that | things like terrorism...[don't] happen." For Gulf War veteran Sgt. | Joseph Black of Massillon, the only complaint was that we waited this | long. "Saddam should have been removed a long time ago, either by the | United States or by the surrounding Arab states for the crimes he | committed against his people." As you would expect, however, there was | not unanimity on the question. Spc. Dickens thought "there were other | places that needed attention first" but said, "[N]ow that we are here, | we need to finish the job." | | Rooney's second question was: "Are you doing what America set out to do | to make Iraq a democracy, or have we failed so badly that we should | pack up and get out before more of you are killed?" This question drew | a unanimous and emphatic response from every trooper I spoke to. Spc. | Dickens explained, "[w]e're doing exactly what we set out to do." As | for pulling out, he took the prospect quite personally: "We've told the | people that we are here to help. If they pull us out now, they would | make me into a liar." Spc. Richmond recognized a simple fact which too | many armchair analysts in the states overlook: "We are doing what is | necessary to make Iraq a democracy - it takes time." Sgt. Black echoed | this sentiment, saying "[a]nyone who thinks that we could undo 35 years | of brutality with a band-aid is sorely mistaken." Black emphasized the | work being done by his troop - including training the Iraqi National | Guard and digging wells for local villages - as evidence of the good | that is being done on a daily basis by the military in Iraq. Sgt. | Porter pointed out that his troop is "helping the Kurds and the Arabs | to work together" - something I witnessed in a contract which the | platoon helped negotiate between two villages, one Kurdish and one | Arab, which had previous harbored distrust toward each other. And | again, the irrepressible Spc. James offered candor: "Who the hell is | saying we failed?" He conceded, "it's tough over here, but you expect | that. . . . This is a war against terrorism; this is about winning the | peace. That doesn't mean that there isn't going to be any fighting." | | Rooney's third question was: "Do the orders you get handed down from | one headquarters to another, all far removed from the fighting, seem | sensible, or do you think our highest command is out of touch with the | reality of your situation?" Cpt. Trampes Crow, a civil-affairs officer | from Alabama, gave a response typical of the troops: "Every soldier | thinks that headquarters is out of touch.... What kind of question is | that? Of course he is going to get the kind of answer he wants." Sgt. | Black agreed: "I think that is just a bogus question and a waste of | ink. I think that every soldier going back to the days of spears and | slingshots thought that their leaders were out of touch.... But with | modern communication, they are probably more in touch." Sgt. Porter | thought that the "highest command has some sense of what's going on, | but they don't know exactly what's going on. But then, we don't know | what's going on in headquarters, and if we did, [the orders] might make | more sense." Spc. Richmond had his doubts, suggesting that "a lot of | the commands they give us are out of touch with reality, even if they | are for our safety." And 1st Lt. Barry Naum of Chardon, Ohio, offered | some historical perspective: "[The orders] seem more sensible than if | someone told me to get on a boat and charge on a beach filled with | German machine guns. When have orders ever 'made sense' to a soldier?" | | Mr. Rooney's fourth question descended into rhetorical absurdity: If | you could have a medal or a trip home, which would you take? Not | surprisingly, all of the guys said they would prefer to be at home, | something Spc. James expressed poignantly in saying, "[g]etting to see | your family is better than any medal out there." But Cpt. Crow got to | the larger issue, and addressed what seemed to be the motivation behind | Rooney's simplistic question: "Who wouldn't want a trip home? If he is | getting at the bigger question of whether we should be here or whether | we should go home, then we need to stay here to finish the job." Sgt. | Porter said: "Who doesn't want to come home? But it's not like you | hear 'We want to go home! We want to go home.'" | | 5. "Are you encouraged by all the talk back home about how brave you | are and how everyone supports you?" A lot of the guys had problems with | the use of terms like brave or hero. Sgt. Porter's response is | representative: "Encouraged, yes. It's good to hear that people are | remembering you. But brave isn't really a term we use. It's just doing | your job." Sgt. Black said: "Absolutely, I'm encouraged by the words of | support back home. Am I brave? No. I'm just a guy; I'm just a soldier. | But I'm very happy to have the support of my nation. I was blessed to | have the support of the nation in the two wars that I have been in." | Spc. James explained how much the support means: "Oh yeah, it's a big | motivator. Puts a smile on my face. You got kids from school writing | you letters, and you've got family and friends. It's a big help.... A | lot of people, they look up to you. I'm sure when I get home and I put | on that uniform.... it's truly an honor to wear the uniform. You get | treated better when you wear the uniform." Finally, Lt. Naum | opined: "Yeah. It's more encouraging than what the press is saying.... | It's more encouraging than him telling me that I'm a victim. I've never | been a victim." | | Lt. Naum was referring to Mr. Rooney's assertion later in the article | that the National Guard members are predominantly serving for the | money, and didn't think they would be called up. Rooney says they are | therefore victims, not heroes. Sgt. Porter protested, "We're not | victims. We signed up for this. Many of us re-enlisted." Addressing the | idea that National Guard members didn't know what they were getting | into, Lt. Naum said the vast majority of the soldiers who are E-4 and | below enlisted after 9/11 - after we were at war, and thus with the | knowledge that they were likely to be called up. Sgt. Black explained | that many of the men not only volunteered once to join the National | Guard, but volunteered a second time to come to Iraq. Indeed, a number | of the men in this very platoon either transferred into the platoon to | serve in Iraq or specifically volunteered to be deployed. | | I wish Rooney's patronizing column was an isolated occurrence, but his | style of imputing negative morale and treating the troops as simpletons | who don't know what they're doing is reflective of the current mode of | journalism. Because quasi-journalists like Rooney did not agree with | the war and believed it was not justified to their standards, they | extrapolate that the men involved in it must not have a sense of | purpose. But as the soldiers' responses to these questions demonstrate, | Rooney and his colleagues are sorely mistaken. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Kerry on waving the flag | ASA | |||
| Stupid things said by liberals | ASA | |||
| It's only the liberals hating. | ASA | |||
| Mystery Beach Photo Contest | ASA | |||
| Another Boat show | ASA | |||