On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:38:46 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

Good point, but Clinton didn't lie about why we were going to Bosnia.
Bush lied. That's the criminal aspect.


President George W. Bush did not lie about anything. Reports now show
that the intelligence on Iraq was exaggerated.

All you liberal whackos who screamed, "Bush lied," owe him an apology.

BTW, WMDs have been found.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

Bush lied about Iraq. He had it on his agenda from the very
beginning. He lied about his reasons for going to war and
didn't bother to follow up with the intelligence services. For
all of Clinton's faults, he did do that. A couple of shells don't
match the tons of wmds that Powel and others claimed were
there.

Fishboy and you make a great pair.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:38:46 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

Good point, but Clinton didn't lie about why we were going to Bosnia.
Bush lied. That's the criminal aspect.


President George W. Bush did not lie about anything. Reports now show
that the intelligence on Iraq was exaggerated.

All you liberal whackos who screamed, "Bush lied," owe him an apology.

BTW, WMDs have been found.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:45:04 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

Bush lied about Iraq. He had it on his agenda from the very
beginning.

For God's sake, we have plans on the table to attack, or defend every
country on the planet. If we were going to attack Mexico, there would
already be plans somewhere.


He lied about his reasons for going to war and
didn't bother to follow up with the intelligence services.


That's bull****. He put everything on the table. And nobody really
knows where the intelligence problems were.


For
all of Clinton's faults, he did do that. A couple of shells don't
match the tons of wmds that Powel and others claimed were
there.

And the British said they were there. And the Kurds said they were
there. And the UN said they were there. And so on.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

Don't bring God into it. You're not qualified. I think
Bush would be well qualified to attack Mexico. In
fact, that's just about all he's qualified to do.

So, what you're saying is that the British and Kurds
are now responsible for our foreign policy decisions.
Thanks for clearing that up.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:45:04 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

Bush lied about Iraq. He had it on his agenda from the very
beginning.

For God's sake, we have plans on the table to attack, or defend every
country on the planet. If we were going to attack Mexico, there would
already be plans somewhere.


He lied about his reasons for going to war and
didn't bother to follow up with the intelligence services.


That's bull****. He put everything on the table. And nobody really
knows where the intelligence problems were.


For
all of Clinton's faults, he did do that. A couple of shells don't
match the tons of wmds that Powel and others claimed were
there.

And the British said they were there. And the Kurds said they were
there. And the UN said they were there. And so on.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
And the UN said they were there.

That is incorrect.



Regards

Donal
--