Huh? Bush said that there were WMDs. There are none. He
said Iraq was an iminent threat. It wasn't. Those were lies. What
"IS" are you talking about?

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"FamilySailor" wrote in message
...
Good point, but Clinton didn't lie about why we were going to Bosnia.
Bush lied. That's the criminal aspect.

I really don't think he lied.... That "IS" the reason we went into Iraq.
That is the reason everyone who voted to go, voted that way. You sound
like
my 12 year old daughter. My wife said to her that she could go out and
play
after she cleaned her room, but after she finished cleaning her room a
thunderstorm developed and it was pouring down and lightning outside. When
her mom told her she could not go outside, she accused her mother of lying
to her. Now the weather man said it was not going to rain, and my wife did
not tell the weatherman to say that. But, as it turned out and that time
it
was raining. The rain happened despite the evidence compiled to the
contrary. Now I got upset with my little 12 year old daughter for calling
her mother a liar. You see she was just an ignorant little child, who
hopefully has learned what a lie is and what is not a lie. I explained to
her that her mother did not lie, When she told her she could go outside it
was based on what she honestly believed would be going on after she
cleaned
her room. How old are you? Maybe I need to get my little girl to talk to
you
and explain to you what is and what is not a lie.

On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:18:13 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote:

Huh? Bush said that there were WMDs. There are none. He
said Iraq was an iminent threat. It wasn't. Those were lies. What
"IS" are you talking about?

GWB's supporters don't hold him to a very high standard for being
right. I think they conisder this war as falling under the "s*it
happens" category. So far all that we *know* is that nothing we were
told prior to the war was accurate. The Republican controlled
Congress doesn't plan to look into why we were told those things until
after the election. Don't hold your breath. After all, this is
hardly as important as a two bit real estate deal in Arkansas.

Huh? Bush said that there were WMDs. There are none. He
said Iraq was an iminent threat. It wasn't. Those were lies. What
"IS" are you talking about?

OK, what is a weapon of mass destruction. Is saran (sp?) gas a weapon of
mass destruction?
Is putting out a hit on the George Bush a threat to America? Is firing
missiles at American fighter pilots a threat? All you need is one and it was
not a lie. There are many more, but no liberal will ever be satisfied,
because it does not suit their political Bush hating agenda. What if the
weapons were shipped out of the country, say in just a hand full of trucks,
would that mean he still lied. What if that is the facts! Maybe you don't
really know enough to be qualified to accuse the man of being a liar. Maybe
those who have them don't want you to know they have them and they laugh
their ass off at the liberals who yell "Bush LIED! There are no weapons of
mass destruction!" I know either way, I never accused anyone falsely. I
never accused Clinton either, it is not my place, I wasn't there. From our
position it is all hear-say.

Family Sailor,
actually i think it is the liberals that are unwittingly the terrorists

there is plenty that points to the *possibility* that WMD's found their way
to Syria

--actually it is not liberalism ........it is infantile narcissism,
sometimes affected by ritilan deprevation.
don't confuse the two---they are very different.
gf.




"FamilySailor" wrote in message
...
Huh? Bush said that there were WMDs. There are none. He
said Iraq was an iminent threat. It wasn't. Those were lies. What
"IS" are you talking about?

OK, what is a weapon of mass destruction. Is saran (sp?) gas a weapon of
mass destruction?
Is putting out a hit on the George Bush a threat to America? Is firing
missiles at American fighter pilots a threat? All you need is one and it
was
not a lie. There are many more, but no liberal will ever be satisfied,
because it does not suit their political Bush hating agenda. What if the
weapons were shipped out of the country, say in just a hand full of
trucks,
would that mean he still lied. What if that is the facts! Maybe you don't
really know enough to be qualified to accuse the man of being a liar.
Maybe
those who have them don't want you to know they have them and they laugh
their ass off at the liberals who yell "Bush LIED! There are no weapons of
mass destruction!" I know either way, I never accused anyone falsely. I
never accused Clinton either, it is not my place, I wasn't there. From our
position it is all hear-say.

On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:04:39 -0400, "gonefishiing"
wrote:

Family Sailor,
actually i think it is the liberals that are unwittingly the terrorists

there is plenty that points to the *possibility* that WMD's found their way
to Syria

--actually it is not liberalism ........it is infantile narcissism,
sometimes affected by ritilan deprevation.
don't confuse the two---they are very different.
gf.

Oh, well if it was "possible", then by all means start a war. I guess
there isn't much difference than saying that someone "might" have the
intent to develop WMDs so we need a preemptive war to stop someone
from a future action that is possible in an imaginary sort of way. If
imagined future events are the standard, then it is hard to say that
anyone is ever wrong.

Your honor, I had to shoot the bitch or she might have gotten mad,
bought a gun and shot me someday.






"FamilySailor" wrote in message
...
Huh? Bush said that there were WMDs. There are none. He
said Iraq was an iminent threat. It wasn't. Those were lies. What
"IS" are you talking about?

OK, what is a weapon of mass destruction. Is saran (sp?) gas a weapon of
mass destruction?
Is putting out a hit on the George Bush a threat to America? Is firing
missiles at American fighter pilots a threat? All you need is one and it
was
not a lie. There are many more, but no liberal will ever be satisfied,
because it does not suit their political Bush hating agenda. What if the
weapons were shipped out of the country, say in just a hand full of
trucks,
would that mean he still lied. What if that is the facts! Maybe you don't
really know enough to be qualified to accuse the man of being a liar.
Maybe
those who have them don't want you to know they have them and they laugh
their ass off at the liberals who yell "Bush LIED! There are no weapons of
mass destruction!" I know either way, I never accused anyone falsely. I
never accused Clinton either, it is not my place, I wasn't there. From our
position it is all hear-say.

"felton" wrote

Oh, well if it was "possible", then by all means start a war. I guess
there isn't much difference than saying that someone "might" have the
intent to develop WMDs so ....

Your honor, I had to shoot the bitch or she might have gotten mad,
bought a gun and shot me someday.

It's a Texas tradition:

BATF: We had to attack that religeous retreat. They might have been planning
to make illegal weapons. An insane man in an institution said so. So did my
invisible friend.

FBI: Yes, then we had to murder the witnesses, including 40 women &
children, to protect BATFs reputation.

This guy is incredible. If you can't defend yourself, attack liberals.
You are stoooopid!

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"gonefishiing" wrote in message
...
Family Sailor,
actually i think it is the liberals that are unwittingly the terrorists

there is plenty that points to the *possibility* that WMD's found their
way
to Syria

--actually it is not liberalism ........it is infantile narcissism,
sometimes affected by ritilan deprevation.
don't confuse the two---they are very different.
gf.




"FamilySailor" wrote in message
...
Huh? Bush said that there were WMDs. There are none. He
said Iraq was an iminent threat. It wasn't. Those were lies. What
"IS" are you talking about?

OK, what is a weapon of mass destruction. Is saran (sp?) gas a weapon of
mass destruction?
Is putting out a hit on the George Bush a threat to America? Is firing
missiles at American fighter pilots a threat? All you need is one and it
was
not a lie. There are many more, but no liberal will ever be satisfied,
because it does not suit their political Bush hating agenda. What if the
weapons were shipped out of the country, say in just a hand full of
trucks,
would that mean he still lied. What if that is the facts! Maybe you
don't
really know enough to be qualified to accuse the man of being a liar.
Maybe
those who have them don't want you to know they have them and they laugh
their ass off at the liberals who yell "Bush LIED! There are no weapons
of
mass destruction!" I know either way, I never accused anyone falsely. I
never accused Clinton either, it is not my place, I wasn't there. From
our
position it is all hear-say.

hey ganz-------i didn't attack liberals, in fact i didn't attack, i merely
poked fun at infantile narcisists..and your offended!....(wink)

and actually you were right when you stated saddam was the antithesis of
terrorism
an interesting addition, but it never answered the question i asked
nor did felton.
instead you just simply blindly defend your position and attack, deflect
questions and assume everyone else is doing the same.

but you'll never understand that so forget i was here, if you can.

if it makes you feel important---yeah your still kf'd--just not on my
laptop.........

Please don't wink at me. I'm only interested in women.

I'm not defending anything, except that you're a fishboy.

You're lying about the KF, just like Bu**** lied to the
American people.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"gonefishiing" wrote in message
...
hey ganz-------i didn't attack liberals, in fact i didn't attack, i
merely
poked fun at infantile narcisists..and your offended!....(wink)

and actually you were right when you stated saddam was the antithesis of
terrorism
an interesting addition, but it never answered the question i asked
nor did felton.
instead you just simply blindly defend your position and attack, deflect
questions and assume everyone else is doing the same.

but you'll never understand that so forget i was here, if you can.

if it makes you feel important---yeah your still kf'd--just not on my
laptop.........

I think it is just a manipulation game of the sheep like masses to regain
power in Washington, nothing more!


Family Sailor,
actually i think it is the liberals that are unwittingly the terrorists

there is plenty that points to the *possibility* that WMD's found their
way
to Syria

--actually it is not liberalism ........it is infantile narcissism,
sometimes affected by ritilan deprevation.
don't confuse the two---they are very different.
gf.