"felton" wrote
What about Joes' freedom of speech?


Joe is free to see the movie or not, agree with it or not, voice his
displeasure with it or not.

but he can't boycott it? Right?

Who decided this, you?

SV

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 19:45:41 -0400, "Scott Vernon"
wrote:


"felton" wrote
What about Joes' freedom of speech?


Joe is free to see the movie or not, agree with it or not, voice his
displeasure with it or not.

but he can't boycott it? Right?

Who decided this, you?

SV



Joe is perfectly free to choose not to rent the movie or see the
movie. What he wants is to have Blockbuster remove it from their
shelves so that you or I *can't* see it. Basically the same thing
that was attempted by the right wing kooks who tried to get the
distribution of the movie stopped altogether.

Joe is all about controlling the freedoms of others if they don't
agree with his viewpoint. I am surprised you don't see the
difference. If anybody is not qualified to be the thought police, it
is Joe

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:54:40 GMT, felton wrote
this crap:

Joe is perfectly free to choose not to rent the movie or see the
movie. What he wants is to have Blockbuster remove it from their
shelves so that you or I *can't* see it. Basically the same thing
that was attempted by the right wing kooks who tried to get the
distribution of the movie stopped altogether.


Oh no. That is incorrect. Joe doesn't want Blockbuster making money
from that trash, or handing money over to Michael Moore. You can see
the movie when it's out on TV, for free, like I will.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:38:44 -0400, Horvath
wrote:

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:54:40 GMT, felton wrote
this crap:

Joe is perfectly free to choose not to rent the movie or see the
movie. What he wants is to have Blockbuster remove it from their
shelves so that you or I *can't* see it. Basically the same thing
that was attempted by the right wing kooks who tried to get the
distribution of the movie stopped altogether.


Oh no. That is incorrect. Joe doesn't want Blockbuster making money
from that trash, or handing money over to Michael Moore. You can see
the movie when it's out on TV, for free, like I will.

I have already seen the movie. Do you really believe that Joe and his
crowd of "proud Americans" wouldn't try to stop the networks from
airing the program? Besides, 60% of the profits from the film are
supposed to go to charities. Maybe some of it would end up at the
Home for Aging Strippers


"Freedom of the Press, if it means anything at all, means the freedom
to criticize and oppose."
-- George Orwell

And, watching it on TV isn't "free." You are so incredibly stooopid.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:54:40 GMT, felton wrote
this crap:

Joe is perfectly free to choose not to rent the movie or see the
movie. What he wants is to have Blockbuster remove it from their
shelves so that you or I *can't* see it. Basically the same thing
that was attempted by the right wing kooks who tried to get the
distribution of the movie stopped altogether.


Oh no. That is incorrect. Joe doesn't want Blockbuster making money
from that trash, or handing money over to Michael Moore. You can see
the movie when it's out on TV, for free, like I will.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 01:27:12 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

And, watching it on TV isn't "free." You are so incredibly stooopid.

I don't pay for TV shows, dumbass.




Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

Yes you do. You're just too stoooopid to realize it.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 01:27:12 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

And, watching it on TV isn't "free." You are so incredibly stooopid.

I don't pay for TV shows, dumbass.




Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

Or banning books in Georgia... same crowd, different subject.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"felton" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 19:45:41 -0400, "Scott Vernon"
wrote:


"felton" wrote
What about Joes' freedom of speech?


Joe is free to see the movie or not, agree with it or not, voice his
displeasure with it or not.

but he can't boycott it? Right?

Who decided this, you?

SV



Joe is perfectly free to choose not to rent the movie or see the
movie. What he wants is to have Blockbuster remove it from their
shelves so that you or I *can't* see it. Basically the same thing
that was attempted by the right wing kooks who tried to get the
distribution of the movie stopped altogether.

Joe is all about controlling the freedoms of others if they don't
agree with his viewpoint. I am surprised you don't see the
difference. If anybody is not qualified to be the thought police, it
is Joe