Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Who changed the definition to include landmarks?
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're in Jaxworld now.
"otnmbrd" wrote in message k.net... Who changed the definition to include landmarks? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Who changed the definition to include landmarks?
jeffies. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Fog, DR and traffic lights.
From: (JAXAshby) Date: 07/18/2004 12:06 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Who changed the definition to include landmarks? jeffies. No he didn't, you did. Typically, with your poor reading comprehension and lack of abilities where navigation is concerned, you took a statement you didn't understand and tried to turn it to your advantage. Jeff said nothing about pilotage ... you did; Jeff said nothing about using landmarks .... you did. Jeff's comment was that when you start someplace, you know where you are (he can correct me if I'm wrong) .... you could not understand this and manufactured the rest. Shen |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's right - starting with a Fix is pretty fundamental for DR navigation. One
could also say that the compass represents another reference, but that would be too complex for jaxie. "Shen44" wrote in message ... Subject: Fog, DR and traffic lights. From: (JAXAshby) Date: 07/18/2004 12:06 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Who changed the definition to include landmarks? jeffies. No he didn't, you did. Typically, with your poor reading comprehension and lack of abilities where navigation is concerned, you took a statement you didn't understand and tried to turn it to your advantage. Jeff said nothing about pilotage ... you did; Jeff said nothing about using landmarks .... you did. Jeff's comment was that when you start someplace, you know where you are (he can correct me if I'm wrong) .... you could not understand this and manufactured the rest. Shen |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
One
could also say that the compass represents another reference no, one can not. one can ONLY state which direction magnetic North is and which direction relative to that the boat is pointed, but *no* deduction can be made as to which direction actually is actually going. none. but that would be too complex for jaxie. wasn't too complex for Einstein when he wrote his PhD thesis on the subject. you can read that thesis, if you want, by looking up The Special Theory of Relativity. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JAXAshby" wrote in message
... One could also say that the compass represents another reference no, one can not. one can ONLY state which direction magnetic North is and which direction relative to that the boat is pointed, but *no* deduction can be made as to which direction actually is actually going. none. I never claimed you had absolute certainty with infinite precision about the direction of travel. You're the one claiming that's the only definition of DR. In fact, formally speaking, the DR plot by itself makes no such presumption; it only describes the position based on the ship's heading and speed through the water. If you had any understanding of DR you would know this. Once again, you just prove you don't know what DR is. but that would be too complex for jaxie. wasn't too complex for Einstein when he wrote his PhD thesis on the subject. you can read that thesis, if you want, by looking up The Special Theory of Relativity. Einstein's PhD thesis was not special relativity, it was "A New Determination of Molecular Dimensions." And Special Relativity did not focus on the relative motion issues that are significant for ship's navigation. That was fully addressed by Galileo in his "Theory or Relativity" 300 years earlier. Einstein only mentioned it by way of recapitulating traditional physics before showing how Special Relativity is different. It looks like this is yet another topic where you can show your ignorance. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
jeffies, DR is just guessing, and the degree of uncertainty can not be
determined. That is physically impossible. remember, jeffies, when you claimed to have a degree in physics from some junior college? Well, if you had that associates degree in physics you might have heard of the PhD thesis written a hundred some years ago by a young man by the Al Einstein. One could also say that the compass represents another reference no, one can not. one can ONLY state which direction magnetic North is and which direction relative to that the boat is pointed, but *no* deduction can be made as to which direction actually is actually going. none. I never claimed you had absolute certainty with infinite precision about the direction of travel. You're the one claiming that's the only definition of DR. In fact, formally speaking, the DR plot by itself makes no such presumption; it only describes the position based on the ship's heading and speed through the water. If you had any understanding of DR you would know this. Once again, you just prove you don't know what DR is. but that would be too complex for jaxie. wasn't too complex for Einstein when he wrote his PhD thesis on the subject. you can read that thesis, if you want, by looking up The Special Theory of Relativity. Einstein's PhD thesis was not special relativity, it was "A New Determination of Molecular Dimensions." And Special Relativity did not focus on the relative motion issues that are significant for ship's navigation. That was fully addressed by Galileo in his "Theory or Relativity" 300 years earlier. Einstein only mentioned it by way of recapitulating traditional physics before showing how Special Relativity is different. It looks like this is yet another topic where you can show your ignorance. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
you
just prove you don't know what DR is. well, what you claim is fine navigation practise has been illegal for pilots (who easily understand why) for seventy some years. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() JAXAshby wrote: One could also say that the compass represents another reference no, one can not. one can ONLY state which direction magnetic North is and which direction relative to that the boat is pointed, but *no* deduction can be made as to which direction actually is actually going. none. Wrong. If someone has experience with ones particular boat, one has experienced in the past similar conditions, so that one has an educated feel for how much set one has under many conditions, which one can apply to ones magnetic heading to determine which direction one is actually going. otn |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New passport requirements? | Cruising | |||
Boat trailer lights | General | |||
Anchor lights | Cruising | |||
Red over green mast light for sailboat | Boat Building | |||
Red over green mast lights for sailboat | Cruising |