NO jax, I am not agreeing with you, I am responding to your post to me
..... a point you seem to be having trouble following.
Right now, I'd say you've lost track of what you've said to who and who
you are responding to about what ... but, a general state of confusion
is considered normal for you.

otn

JAXAshby wrote:
over the knee, you are agreeing with me and disagreeing with jeffies. did you
lose track of the world around you for a period of time?


...... and your point is? The subject is "dead reckoning", "deduced
reckoning", "ded reckoning", not "fixes", or is this some random thought
which just found it's way out of your brain.
I fail to see how this relates to my post below or anything else, for
that matter.

otn

JAXAshby wrote:

over the knee, **if** you have known references point **then** you are not
deducing anything at all about where you are.

why are you being such a dumb cluck?



yeah, that's it. yesterday means tomorrow, green means frying pan and DR

means


whatever you want, today at 7:53 PM Eastern Daylight Time when posting as

what


the frick ever.


Now, now, jax .... don't get yer spandex speedo in an uproar .....
simply stated, you just don't know enough about actual navigation to
have the ability to carry on an intelligent discussion on the subject.
BTW, next time you look up "dead reckoning", "ded reckoning", "deduced
reckoning", read the whole definition.
Although I doubt you'll be able to comprehend the possibilities .......

Tataaa

otn

maybe, over the knee, you don't know what reference points are, or what
constitutes a reference point. jeffies, doesn't/didn't.

like Ragu, "It's in there".

NO jax, I am not agreeing with you, I am responding to your post to me
.... a point you seem to be having trouble following.
Right now, I'd say you've lost track of what you've said to who and who
you are responding to about what ... but, a general state of confusion
is considered normal for you.

otn

JAXAshby wrote:
over the knee, you are agreeing with me and disagreeing with jeffies. did
you
lose track of the world around you for a period of time?


...... and your point is? The subject is "dead reckoning", "deduced
reckoning", "ded reckoning", not "fixes", or is this some random thought
which just found it's way out of your brain.
I fail to see how this relates to my post below or anything else, for
that matter.

otn

JAXAshby wrote:

over the knee, **if** you have known references point **then** you are not
deducing anything at all about where you are.

why are you being such a dumb cluck?



yeah, that's it. yesterday means tomorrow, green means frying pan and
DR

means


whatever you want, today at 7:53 PM Eastern Daylight Time when posting
as

what


the frick ever.


Now, now, jax .... don't get yer spandex speedo in an uproar .....
simply stated, you just don't know enough about actual navigation to
have the ability to carry on an intelligent discussion on the subject.
BTW, next time you look up "dead reckoning", "ded reckoning", "deduced
reckoning", read the whole definition.
Although I doubt you'll be able to comprehend the possibilities .......

Tataaa

otn

JAXAshby wrote:
maybe, over the knee, you don't know what reference points are, or what
constitutes a reference point. jeffies, doesn't/didn't.

like Ragu, "It's in there".

jax, you really,really do need help with "reading comprehension".
You can't just take what someone writes and interpret it to suit your
needs or point of view ..... go back and read what he said, then before
you write something, take the time to think what it means.

otn

over the knee, it sounds like you are starting to back peddle in anticipation
of **finally** understanding the concept of relative motion.

maybe, over the knee, you don't know what reference points are, or what
constitutes a reference point. jeffies, doesn't/didn't.

like Ragu, "It's in there".

jax, you really,really do need help with "reading comprehension".
You can't just take what someone writes and interpret it to suit your
needs or point of view ..... go back and read what he said, then before
you write something, take the time to think what it means.

otn

ROFLMAO How do you come up with these responses?!!

otn

JAXAshby wrote:
over the knee, it sounds like you are starting to back peddle in anticipation
of **finally** understanding the concept of relative motion.


maybe, over the knee, you don't know what reference points are, or what
constitutes a reference point. jeffies, doesn't/didn't.

like Ragu, "It's in there".

jax, you really,really do need help with "reading comprehension".
You can't just take what someone writes and interpret it to suit your
needs or point of view ..... go back and read what he said, then before
you write something, take the time to think what it means.

otn

gee, over the knee, just when you seem to be starting to grasp the elemental
concepts you blast off into you spirally world again, lost to the real world.

ROFLMAO How do you come up with these responses?!!

otn

JAXAshby wrote:
over the knee, it sounds like you are starting to back peddle in
anticipation
of **finally** understanding the concept of relative motion.


maybe, over the knee, you don't know what reference points are, or what
constitutes a reference point. jeffies, doesn't/didn't.

like Ragu, "It's in there".

jax, you really,really do need help with "reading comprehension".
You can't just take what someone writes and interpret it to suit your
needs or point of view ..... go back and read what he said, then before
you write something, take the time to think what it means.

otn