JAXAshby wrote:
over the knee, give it up for the kriste sakes. once ah-fricken-ghen you are
arguing a physical impossibilty. most every scientist -- and certainly every
last physicist -- on the planet is laughing at you.

You, over the knee, have a better chance of arguing astrology is valid.

Try to pay attention, difficult as that may be.
The subject is navigation ..... because someone is a scientist,
physicist, or astrologist, it doesn't necessarily hold that they are a
"navigator".
If you had any experience, you would know that navigation, especially in
the past, was as much an "art form" as it was a "science".
Especially, back then, your "basic" definition of "DR" was used and
held, *AS* the basic definition, but again as stated, it was not the
only definition, then as now.
The only problem I really see here, is that you have at best a highly
limited knowledge base of navigation, coupled with extremely little
experience, so, that, coupled with your consistently poor showing in
reading comprehension and lack of ability to grasp or expand on a
concept other than the one you may have been initially taught, you can't
possibly grasp how these other factors could possibly be applied to the
definition of "DR" ..... hey, no problem .... just stick with the basics
you know .... it's not like you're going to be senior navigator on some
offshore boat, at any time.

otn

there you have it, folks. over the knee "the astrology proof" as to why the
scientists of the world are wrong. In other words, over the knee is telling us
the **he** knows (because **he** hasn't yet hit the rocks) that the laws of
physics are wrong, wrong, wrong.

good on ya, dum-dum, for being lucky. so far.

over the knee, give it up for the kriste sakes. once ah-fricken-ghen you
are
arguing a physical impossibilty. most every scientist -- and certainly
every
last physicist -- on the planet is laughing at you.

You, over the knee, have a better chance of arguing astrology is valid.

Try to pay attention, difficult as that may be.
The subject is navigation ..... because someone is a scientist,
physicist, or astrologist, it doesn't necessarily hold that they are a
"navigator".
If you had any experience, you would know that navigation, especially in
the past, was as much an "art form" as it was a "science".
Especially, back then, your "basic" definition of "DR" was used and
held, *AS* the basic definition, but again as stated, it was not the
only definition, then as now.
The only problem I really see here, is that you have at best a highly
limited knowledge base of navigation, coupled with extremely little
experience, so, that, coupled with your consistently poor showing in
reading comprehension and lack of ability to grasp or expand on a
concept other than the one you may have been initially taught, you can't
possibly grasp how these other factors could possibly be applied to the
definition of "DR" ..... hey, no problem .... just stick with the basics
you know .... it's not like you're going to be senior navigator on some
offshore boat, at any time.

otn

JAXAshby wrote:
there you have it, folks. over the knee "the astrology proof" as to why the
scientists of the world are wrong. In other words, over the knee is telling us
the **he** knows (because **he** hasn't yet hit the rocks) that the laws of
physics are wrong, wrong, wrong.

good on ya, dum-dum, for being lucky. so far.


ROFLMAO There you have it folks! Ole jaxass hasn't enough knowledge and
experience with navigation, to argue one point I made, so he falls back
on his usual "scientist of the world", "physics", "astrology" ploy in
yet *ANOTHER* vain attempt to cover the fact.

jax, it's becoming obvious that even the simple process of "DR" is way
beyond your abilities.

otn

over the knee, the laws of physics were not voted on by corrupt politicians and
they are not suspendable by you just because you didn't prior understand them.
You do understand them now, right? You do understand that DR is just a guess
and not a very good one at that, don't you?

I do hope you don't try to cling to your prior belief that just because you
don't understand something that it therefore can not be right. only really
stew ped people think that and you are not stew ped, are you over the knee?

there you have it, folks. over the knee "the astrology proof" as to why
the
scientists of the world are wrong. In other words, over the knee is
telling us
the **he** knows (because **he** hasn't yet hit the rocks) that the laws of
physics are wrong, wrong, wrong.

good on ya, dum-dum, for being lucky. so far.


ROFLMAO There you have it folks! Ole jaxass hasn't enough knowledge and
experience with navigation, to argue one point I made, so he falls back
on his usual "scientist of the world", "physics", "astrology" ploy in
yet *ANOTHER* vain attempt to cover the fact.

jax, it's becoming obvious that even the simple process of "DR" is way
beyond your abilities.

otn