Wrong enemy, Bart. Liberals do NOT want to ban guns completely. Staunch
liberals like Diane Fienstien (sp?) and Teddy Kennedy either carry guns or
hire bodyguards who do. But they are for sale just like Bush is for sale
and will sponsor anti-gun legislation for a fee. Who pays them? The same
people who pay Sarah Brady - the churches who irrationally believe that self
defense is a sin and should be a crime. Why do you think they want guns
with no sporting purpose banned first? Why all the outcry calling every act
of self defense "vigilantism"? I repeat: know your enemy! You'll find him
in your church with his hand in the poor box and collection plate, diverting
money donated to the poor to Sarah Brady so she can buy politicians.


"Bart Senior" wrote in message
...
The big problem is the extremist liberals want to ban guns completely
and they make up new laws based on false information to chip away
at the Second Amendment in every possible way. ......