What If # 6
 

wrote in message
...
On 09 Jul 2004 15:16:55 GMT, (Bobspirt) wrote:

In this case, lightweight like a Clorox Bottle.

BB

As if a C&C 27 is not. . .

I can't tell the difference between a C&C 27 and a Mac 26m

BB

What If # 6
 

wrote in message
...
On 09 Jul 2004 15:36:29 GMT, (Bobspirt) wrote:

If you can't tell the difference between a C&C 27 and a Mac 26m, you
must be the King of all lubbers.

I didn't say they were the same. Just that some would consider a C&C 27
a
clorox bottle also.

And I said:

I can't tell the difference between a C&C 27 and a Mac 26m
BB

What If # 6
 

I didn't say they were the same. Just that some would consider a C&C 27 a
clorox bottle also.

And I said:

If you can't tell the difference between a C&C 27 and a Mac 26m, you
must be the King of all lubbers. My guess is that your only boating
experience was riding a tube down a waterslide at Big Adventure. You
really should have worn a helmet.

BB

Is that the best your weak, little, outgunned wit can come up with? The same
lame, irrelevant jab? You shouldn't even waste your time posting. Come to
think of it, there are a lot of similarities between the Cheap & Crappy 27 and
the Mac 26.

What If # 6
 

wrote in message
...
On 9 Jul 2004 17:28:00 GMT, "Scott Vernon" wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On 09 Jul 2004 15:36:29 GMT, (Bobspirt) wrote:

If you can't tell the difference between a C&C 27 and a Mac 26m, you
must be the King of all lubbers.

I didn't say they were the same. Just that some would consider a C&C
27
a
clorox bottle also.

And I said:

I can't tell the difference between a C&C 27 and a Mac 26m
BB

Poor Scotty! The only boat he can look down on, compared to his
Sidelmann is a C&C 27.

BB

What If # 6
 

wrote in message
...
On 9 Jul 2004 18:21:09 GMT, "Scott Vernon" wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On 9 Jul 2004 17:28:00 GMT, "Scott Vernon" wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On 09 Jul 2004 15:36:29 GMT, (Bobspirt) wrote:

If you can't tell the difference between a C&C 27 and a Mac 26m,
you
must be the King of all lubbers.

I didn't say they were the same. Just that some would consider a
C&C
27
a
clorox bottle also.

And I said:

I can't tell the difference between a C&C 27 and a Mac 26m
BB

Poor Scotty! The only boat he can look down on, compared to his
Sidelmann is a C&C 27.

BB

Sidelmann 30 - PHRF 189
C&C 27-5 - PHRF 168

Looks like the Sidelmann is a bit of a slug compared to the C&C 27,
despite the additional length. Not surprisingly, the C&C 27-5 is
usually grouped with boats over 30 feet. The fact that many Sidelmann
owners themselves are quite sluglike is bound to be a factor.

BB

That's nice Bill, but what does this have to do with me?

SV

What If # 6
 

wrote in message clorox bottle
also.



Sidelmann 30 - PHRF 189
C&C 27-5 - PHRF 168


I don't own a Sidelmann 30, you nitwit.


--
Scotty
S/V Lisa Marie
Balt. MD USA

What If # 6
 

wrote in


I don't own a Sidelmann 30, you nitwit.

Winnebago 30?

BB

No, Bob.

SV