hey, guys? kindly keep your quotes straight.

That's right!

BC

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
WTF?

Over.


Figures never lie and liars use figures.

It's the interpretation of the data and the sample space.

You're telling me a 10 year old ghetto crack junko lines up to take an IQ
test? Get real! The true underclass just falls through the cracks, they
don't get counted.

The bottom line: your conclusion is wrong. I'm not saying you are stupid,
in
fact, you are one of the most intelligent persons on this group. It's
obvious you are of high intelligence and have superior thinking skills.
Additionally your interest and observational skills make you a true
Rennaisance man, second to none. I thusly commend you on your high level
of
mental acuity but must insist that your conclusions based on narrowly
sampled data is wrong. I respectfully ask that you reconsider your
position.

Your colleague,

Bob Crantz

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
check your figures. they don't match the data. are you saying
therefore
the
data is wrong?


"JAXAshby" wrote in message


One of the reasons the human population continues to improve in
intelligence is
that the dumb die off quicker and they breed less often (on the
average)
because they have less resources to support children and their
children
die
more often before reaching breeding age.

Not true at all. The lower class breeds like rats. Genetically, the
intelligence level is droping with all this low class breeding. In
fact,
liberals want to fund the lower class to breed more. The root of this
mess
are the liberals. I'm all for mandatory sterilization of welfare
recipients
and internment/re-education camps for liberals. Round them up now!
Vote
for
Bush!!!

BC

JAXAshby wrote:

hey, guys? kindly keep your quotes straight.

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahaha ... now THAT has to go down as the most
ironic statement ever posted in the history of this group!

Just think, Jax, the queen of misattribution and hallucinatory quotes is
asking someone else to keep their "quotes straight."

It must be the middle of a long winter in Jaxworld.

Rick

I corrected your spelling.

"Rick" wrote

Just think, Jax, the queen of masturbation and hallucinatory quotes

..

Horvy & bob****?

On 04 Jun 2004 14:54:44 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

where is that guy who claimed to have an EE in physics (and the guy who claimed
to have a EEE in physics) when we need someone to explain to the Peanut Gallery
just what in hell a siphon is.


Ah, the triple E guy would be me....for the record, it was an ironic
statement. BTW, "Woosh" is the sound of a clue going over your head.

My point was that I think it's silly that you try to prove a point
with facts having no relation to the original topic whatsoever.


Interestingly, Forbes or Businessweek or one of those mags recently published
data that clearly showed the reason lower class people don't live as long as
middle and upper-middle class people (dispite wildly available health care to
most all) is because lower class people can't/won't read health labels,
can't/won't seek medical care when they should, can't/won't follow a doctor's
advice, can't//won't read the labels on medicine bottles, can't/won't follow
prescribed medications. Interesting is that while the average IQ of a white
collar worker in about 111 (a little above average) the average IQ of a lower
class worker is about 89 (pretty much below average), or a 22 point spread.

One of the reasons the human population continues to improve in intelligence is
that the dumb die off quicker and they breed less often (on the average)
because they have less resources to support children and their children die
more often before reaching breeding age.

Since you bring this subject to this group instead of
rec.boats.cruising, where to original thread was located, we now know
in which group you belong.... :-P


Cheers!


Remco

rick, get loose of the drugs or face of the loss of your alleged CG and FAA
licenses.

hey, guys? kindly keep your quotes straight.

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahaha ... now THAT has to go down as the most
ironic statement ever posted in the history of this group!

Just think, Jax, the queen of misattribution and hallucinatory quotes is
asking someone else to keep their "quotes straight."

It must be the middle of a long winter in Jaxworld.

Rick

speaking of REALLY dumb ... NOS PAM, add new dimensions to the term. way to
go.

where is that guy who claimed to have an EE in physics (and the guy who
claimed
to have a EEE in physics) when we need someone to explain to the Peanut
Gallery
just what in hell a siphon is.


Ah, the triple E guy would be me....for the record, it was an ironic
statement. BTW, "Woosh" is the sound of a clue going over your head.

My point was that I think it's silly that you try to prove a point
with facts having no relation to the original topic whatsoever.


Interestingly, Forbes or Businessweek or one of those mags recently
published
data that clearly showed the reason lower class people don't live as long as
middle and upper-middle class people (dispite wildly available health care
to
most all) is because lower class people can't/won't read health labels,
can't/won't seek medical care when they should, can't/won't follow a
doctor's
advice, can't//won't read the labels on medicine bottles, can't/won't follow
prescribed medications. Interesting is that while the average IQ of a white
collar worker in about 111 (a little above average) the average IQ of a
lower
class worker is about 89 (pretty much below average), or a 22 point spread.

One of the reasons the human population continues to improve in intelligence
is
that the dumb die off quicker and they breed less often (on the average)
because they have less resources to support children and their children die
more often before reaching breeding age.

Since you bring this subject to this group instead of
rec.boats.cruising, where to original thread was located, we now know
in which group you belong.... :-P


Cheers!


Remco

On 13 Jun 2004 18:29:11 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

speaking of REALLY dumb ... NOS PAM, add new dimensions to the term. way to
go.

Thanks for proving my point!


My point was that I think it's silly that you try to prove a point
with facts having no relation to the original topic whatsoever.


Cheers!

Remco

Nos Pam, if you were capable of having a point it would have been noticed well
before you finally graduated third grade.

speaking of REALLY dumb ... NOS PAM, add new dimensions to the term. way to
go.

Thanks for proving my point!


My point was that I think it's silly that you try to prove a point
with facts having no relation to the original topic whatsoever.


Cheers!

Remco

On 14 Jun 2004 12:21:00 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

Nos Pam, if you were capable of having a point it would have been noticed well
before you finally graduated third grade.

Hmmm, namecalling, AOL user, topposter AND not realising I'm not
American (third grade in Holland isn't like it is in America)

I'm looking forward to another reply, pal. :-)


Cheers!


Remco