Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... jeffies, that line drawing from an advertising brochure does NOT show any anti-siphon valve at all. Duh. btw, it also doesn't show the water injection system, which *is*above the water line. It doesn't matter, the ABYC standard requires the siphon break if the exhaust manifold is below water at any angle of heel, with any loading. It sure looks like that would be the case here. Further, we know the engine got water in it. Perhaps the standards were written after a number of these older boats got "flooded." jeffies? why oh why do you have such a hard time understanding just what makes a siphon viable or not? Jaxie? Why can't you accept what the standards are, what the instructions are, and what the experts say? You clearly have no knowlege of common practice; you're just making up bull****. If your claims are correct, you should have no problem posting a link that back them up. If you can't, you should go home and change your pants. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Incredible learning experience | ASA | |||
Along with Chuck's story, here's another one where things went wrong... | General | |||
FAQ: Surviving Usenet: A Guide for the Earnest Newcomer | General |