Captain Klutz?
 

Well, I guess it depends on the dress.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Donal" wrote in message
...
You seem to think that semen stains are worse than dead Americans!!

Captain Klutz?
 

He was lucky! Not only that, he actually did something about it. Something
the Bush administration is claiming that they "kept doing" for 8 mos.
Apparently,
not very well, since they demoted Clarke to a non-cabinet post. Quite a
great
bunch of motivators aren't they.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 00:07:57 +0100, "Donal" said:

I am referring to the fact that Clinton did a
much better job of protecting American lives.

Just a coupla questions.

Who was President on February 26, 1993, and what happened on that date?

Who was President on April 19, 1995, and what happened on that date?

Look it up, and then tell me that with the score two to one Clinton wasn't
just lucky that even more people weren't killed in the two successful
practice runs he was impotent to prevent.


Dave
S/V Good Fortune
CS27

Captain Klutz?
 

I think the issue of 3000 people dead is slightly more important
than a few million dead sperm. Of course, that isn't true if you're
part of the religious right. They're a friend of the fetus right up
until it's born.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 00:07:57 +0100, "Donal" said:

You seem to think that semen stains are worse than dead Americans!!

I do find it pretty funny that in the last couple of days so many Dems
have
suddenly begun to attach so much importance to testimony's being under
oath.


Dave
S/V Good Fortune
CS27

Captain Klutz?
 

"Dave" wrote

Right. That's why after the dry run in 1993 it happened again in 1995. The
only thing he seems to have "done" is his intern.


Ganzy thinks that's a bad thing. He's from San Fran, ya know.

Scotty

Captain Klutz?
 

Well, that's quite easy to say from the perspective of a right wing
freakazoid
such as yourself. Seems to me that you just can't get enough of Clinton and
his blowjob. Are you jealous from Monica's or Clinton's perspective?

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 17:24:27 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"
said:

He was lucky! Not only that, he actually did something about it.

Right. That's why after the dry run in 1993 it happened again in 1995. The
only thing he seems to have "done" is his intern.

Dave
S/V Good Fortune
CS27

Captain Klutz?
 

Nah, never lived in SF.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
"Dave" wrote

Right. That's why after the dry run in 1993 it happened again in 1995.
The
only thing he seems to have "done" is his intern.


Ganzy thinks that's a bad thing. He's from San Fran, ya know.

Scotty

Captain Klutz?
 

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 00:07:57 +0100, "Donal" said:

I am referring to the fact that Clinton did a
much better job of protecting American lives.

Just a coupla questions.

Who was President on February 26, 1993, and what happened on that date?

Who was President on April 19, 1995, and what happened on that date?

Look it up, and then tell me that with the score two to one

Hey, I've got better things to do with my time that go on a wild goose chase
around the Internet in an effort to prove you right.

Why don't you *tell* us what happened on those portentious dates?



Clinton wasn't
just lucky that even more people weren't killed in the two successful
practice runs he was impotent to prevent.


So you'd prefer to have an "unlucky" president, - even if it cost thousands
of lives????


Regards


Donal
--

Captain Klutz?
 

Dave, don't be an ass. Clinton was in office a bit over a month.
Seems to me, it would have been planned on Bush Sr.'s watch.

Oklahoma was perpetrated by an inbred sociopath. While he
was a terrorist, he really did it pretty much on his own, unless
you're now claiming that he an Osama were buddies.

I guess this post of yours really shows your true colors. You're
not interested in rational discourse. You're just interested in
your own twisted agenda. Since your hero is fading fast in
the polls, the first thing that comes to mind is blame Clinton.
Or wait, maybe he's part of the stupid race. Only your
hairdresser knows for sure.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 00:14:54 +0100, "Donal" said:

Who was President on February 26, 1993, and what happened on that date?

Who was President on April 19, 1995, and what happened on that date?

Look it up, and then tell me that with the score two to one

[snip]

Why don't you *tell* us what happened on those portentious dates?

February 26, 1993, first World Trade Center bombing--occurring, of course,
on Clinton's watch.

April 19, 1995, Oklahoma City bombing--occurring again, of course, on
Clinton's watch.

Now could you 'splain again about how Clinton did such a great job of
protecting us from terrorist attacks?


Dave
S/V Good Fortune
CS27

Captain Klutz?
 

Dave, you're just being an asshole. When in doubt, right wing freakazoids
blame Clinton. There was a significant difference. Clinton didn't alienate
the entire muslim world. Bush did. Clinton lied about a blowjob. Bush
lied about a war. Clinton was an articulate president, capable of speaking
without notes on just about every subject. Bush is inarticulate to say the
least (even Reagan was better, which isn't saying much). Bush has to be
coached on everything. He trying to appeal to the "common man," by
claiming he doesn't read newspapers, which is another lie. He does. So,
he's again lying.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 23:05:00 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"
said:

Dave, don't be an ass. Clinton was in office a bit over a month.
Seems to me, it would have been planned on Bush Sr.'s watch.

Oklahoma was perpetrated by an inbred sociopath. While he
was a terrorist, he really did it pretty much on his own, unless
you're now claiming that he an Osama were buddies.

Actually, Jonathan, I was simply addressing Oz's absurd claim that there
is
a significant difference in favor of Clinton in the degree of protection
against terrorism provided by either President before 9/11. There wasn't.
And just as the first WTC bombing was no doubt planned to a large degree
on
Bush Sr.'s watch, the 9/11 attack was planned to a large degree on
Clinton's
watch. Al Qaeda didn't just say on January 20 "Bush is President now, so
let's fly planes into the WTC. Oh, and better get some people into pilot
training so they'll be ready in time."

As to OC, a terrorist is a terrorist. It doesn't make any difference
whether
he has a foreign accent or talks like a hillbilly when you make the body
count. The point again is not that that attack could have been prevented
(though there are law enforcement types whose job is to prevent such
things). Rather it's that Oz's statement is simply absurd on its face.


Dave
S/V Good Fortune
CS27

Captain Klutz?
 

Oh come on. The hatred of us in muslim countries is off
the scale. After 9/11, there was a huge outpouring of
sympathy all over the world, including a huge number of
muslims. Now, they hate our guts like nobody's business...
All thanks to Bush.

What you're claiming is that the second WTC bombing
is a result of hatred by the majority of muslims, which you
know isn't true. They may not have loved us, but most
wouldn't stoop to something so low. After then bombing,
there was sympathy and empathy. Then Bush, Rummy,
Condi, and Wolfy stepped in. Terror attacks have increased
dramatically. Thanks Bush, you lying sack of sh*t.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 11:59:06 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
said:

Clinton didn't alienate
the entire muslim world. Bush did.

Right. And that bomb under the WTC was really just a couple of
Palestinians
who accidentally dropped a match into a truck of fertilizer they were
hauling to NJ. Bush must have done a helluva job of alienating in a mighty
short time between the time he took office and the time planning of the
second WTC attack was started, Mr. Grimm.





Dave
S/V Good Fortune
CS27