But the elect. motor/gen. sounds ideal if the costs
could be competitive.

AND if you are willing to sail for 173 days straight just to motor less than a
day. (see prior post).

Go away. You're stupid and boring.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
But the elect. motor/gen. sounds ideal if the costs
could be competitive.

AND if you are willing to sail for 173 days straight just to motor less
than a
day. (see prior post).

joony, do you have stock in yet another fuel cell company?

Go away. You're stupid and boring.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
But the elect. motor/gen. sounds ideal if the costs
could be competitive.

AND if you are willing to sail for 173 days straight just to motor less
than a
day. (see prior post).

Probably. At least I'm not a dinosaur in my thinking.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
joony, do you have stock in yet another fuel cell company?

Go away. You're stupid and boring.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
But the elect. motor/gen. sounds ideal if the costs
could be competitive.

AND if you are willing to sail for 173 days straight just to motor less
than a
day. (see prior post).

ah, I see. all it takes to make fuel cells viable is FAITH!!!

okay joony. anything you say.

Probably. At least I'm not a dinosaur in my thinking.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
joony, do you have stock in yet another fuel cell company?

Go away. You're stupid and boring.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
But the elect. motor/gen. sounds ideal if the costs
could be competitive.

AND if you are willing to sail for 173 days straight just to motor less
than a
day. (see prior post).

ah, I forgot about Perpetual Motion drives. Thanks for reminding me.

Hardly perpetual motion.
The sails provide the horsepower to recharge for the most part.

no, "for the most part" nobody uses the technology/techniques suggested because
the **** don't work.

dragging buckets to gather water to pour on a watermill to turn the propeller
is still dragging buckets. It slows you down.

To the extent there is any gain at all, it is more costly, heavier, less
reliable than a gas or diesel fired engine.

So, now you're claiming that they aren't viable? They don't work?
No one uses them?

okay jaxass. anything you say.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
ah, I see. all it takes to make fuel cells viable is FAITH!!!

okay joony. anything you say.

Probably. At least I'm not a dinosaur in my thinking.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
joony, do you have stock in yet another fuel cell company?

Go away. You're stupid and boring.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
But the elect. motor/gen. sounds ideal if the costs
could be competitive.

AND if you are willing to sail for 173 days straight just to motor
less
than a
day. (see prior post).

you are a slow study, joony, but you get there, don't you.

So, now you're claiming that they aren't viable? They don't work?
No one uses them?

okay jaxass. anything you say.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
ah, I see. all it takes to make fuel cells viable is FAITH!!!

okay joony. anything you say.

Probably. At least I'm not a dinosaur in my thinking.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
joony, do you have stock in yet another fuel cell company?

Go away. You're stupid and boring.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
But the elect. motor/gen. sounds ideal if the costs
could be competitive.

AND if you are willing to sail for 173 days straight just to motor
less
than a
day. (see prior post).

sounds like too long jax, re-do your math. Take a couple days, then get
back to us.

SV


"JAXAshby" wrote

AND if you are willing to sail for 173 days straight just to motor less
than a
day. (see prior post).

okay, here's the math condensed.

173 days sailing needed to produce enough energy to motor 1 day.

sounds like too long jax, re-do your math. Take a couple days, then get
back to us.

SV


"JAXAshby" wrote

AND if you are willing to sail for 173 days straight just to motor less
than a
day. (see prior post).