Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
According to this mornings news Nadar is running. DNC is running scared.
But they aren't willing to make a coalition. They did say there are some issues that Nadar could raise that wouldn't otherwise be raised. WHY wouldn't those issues be raised unless he runs? Hmmmmmm. They also bluntly said they don't want his legacy to be one of re-electing Bush. But they are stopping short of anything meaningful. Course when Kerry takes over the party that could change. Remember his campaign theme song "Seasons Change and So do I, You need not wonder why. I've no time left for you." Remember the Greens destroyed Gore in ultra liberal Oregon and became a registered major party as a result. What they did there they can do elsewhere. The Libertarians destroyed Republicans in neighboring Washington and became a registered major party as a result. What they did there they can do elsewhere. Looks like we may get a two party if not multi party system after all instead of the two sided one party system we have now. You heard the prediction first here . . .I'll repeat it. The Democrats won't coalesce with the Greens. Instead they'll offer sops and demand the Greens come to them. If the Democrats put Green demands verbatim in their party platform they will lose more than they gain. The Greens won't settle for a partial loaf. But the Greens will make major party status in a few more states as a result figuring they are better off treating 2004 as a 'team building' year. The Republicans will offer the Libertarians a meaningful role in a coalition and put some of, but not all the Libertarian goals in their party platform. The Libertarians having shown they can effect real change will gain in a meaningful way and 2004 will be a team building year. They will elect people locally and make gains nationally because they realize part of the loaf is a huge gain compared to none of the loaf. In future the Republicans have only to keep their deal with the Libs to keep their support in a majority coalition. The Democrats . . . . ? Will lose seats at every level and wonder why? Change that. Seasons Change . . don't wonder why. The face of politics is a-changing . . . . bout time. M. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael wrote:
According to this mornings news Nadar is running. Gee, did the Republicans hand him a few million dollars for his campaign... again... ...DNC is running scared. But they aren't willing to make a coalition. The Republican and Democratic parties are both coalitions already. DSK |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" The Republican and Democratic parties are both coalitions already. DSK True. Unfortunately we need more than one party to make a two party system. M. Voting for the lesser of two evils only makes you a person who supports evil. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael wrote:
Voting for the lesser of two evils only makes you a person who supports evil. Not at all. It makes you a person who cares enough to go out and vote. If more people did, things would be different. DSK |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You must be in this world, but be not a part of it.
DSK wrote: Michael wrote: Voting for the lesser of two evils only makes you a person who supports evil. Not at all. It makes you a person who cares enough to go out and vote. If more people did, things would be different. DSK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A future Nobel prize winner on a former winner | Cruising | |||
The future of Anerican Jobs thanks to Bush | General | |||
Florida: Everglades airboats face uncertain future | General | |||
Bush To Personally Verify Future CIA Reports | ASA |