| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... I go away for a few days and come back to the same silliness. I've combined Donal's two posts ... The explanation that I gave several times (and I think the "pros" agreed with) is that vessels that are "hampered" are given the special signal of "prolonged-short-short." Although this does not give them any special right-of-way, it is a message to other vessels that these vessels has some limitation in maneuverability, and should be given the widest possible berth. Why should they be given a wide berth, if they don't have any special right of way? In the fog, its impossible to determine the nature of the boat's limitations, we only know that it is in a class of boats that includes tows, fishing boats with gear, RAMs and NUCs. It would be a good idea to give extra room to such a vessel. Would it? Why do write such nonsense? To the fool, its nonsense. To the experienced mariner, its wisdom. Why didn't you say that you were an experienced mariner? If I'd realised that you knew much more than I did, then I would have respectfully touched my cap and backed away in embarrassement. If you don't believe that last statement, then do a Google. Look for an instance where I've openly disagreed with Ole Thom, Nav, Oz, Capt American, Mooron, Katy, Wally, Peters(various), Matt Colie, Seahag, Martin, Roy, John, or Jon! I may disagree with them on non-sailing issues, but I've never argued with any of them on sailing related issues. Don't you find that a bit strange? Why is it that, in *5* years, I've never had a serious, sailing, disagreement with anybody who knows anything about the subject? I've always backed off when confronted by someone who has more experience than me. Why is it that you think that I am Are you really asking us to believe that a boat should be given a wide berth, and at the same time, we must not give way to that boat? How do you give way to a boat, and maintain your stand-on status at the same time? There is no such thing as "give way" and "stand-on" status in the fog. Have you not learned anything about the rules? Read my statement again! I *know* that there is no such thing as a "give way" boat. Furthermore, I am 90% certain that you are aware that I know this. Do you "give way" when you encounter a "stand on vessel"? If you do, then you understand what I am saying. If you don't, then you are in breach of the CollRegs. Perhaps you could now explain why you are saying that I know nothing because I think that I must "give way"? Let me try to ask the same question a bit more politely. Why would you give another vessel a "wide berth" if you were the stand on vessel? There is a presumption when we say "in the fog" that we are talking about "restricted visibility" where vessels are "not in sight of one another." In this situation, there is no "stand-on vessel." Unless you're trying to revive the old troll where Neal claims that at the instant before collision the vessels are in sight, you're just showing your ignorance. Did Neal say that? I thought that it was *me* that made that particular point!! Regards Donal -- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Redneck Girl | General | |||
| Redneck Woman | General | |||
| Dangerous quadrant? | ASA | |||
| Installing storage - cutting aluminum bench, dangerous? | General | |||
| Irrefutable proof of dangerous multihulls. | ASA | |||